- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03384160
Evaluation of Articaine 4% Versus Mepivacaine 2% for Surgery of Molars Thirds: Clinical Trial.
February 5, 2019 updated by: Michelle Bianchi de Moraes, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
Evaluation of Articaine 4% Versus Mepivacaine 2% for Surgery of Molars Thirds: Splint-mouth Randomized Double Blind Controlled Clinical Trial.
The extraction of third molars, a frequent treatment in clinical dental practice, can lead patients to painful symptoms during and after surgery.
The dental surgeon must correctly indicate the need for extraction and also provide patients who need this treatment greater comfort and control of pain in the trans and postoperative period.
Thus, it is necessary to use an effective local anesthetic favoring the factors inherent to the postoperative and achieving good treatment results.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study will compare the use of Articaine at 4% to that of Mepivacaine at 2% for lower third molar surgeries semi-included and / or included.
I will select 16 patients who require surgical treatment for extraction of third molars, aged between 16 and 40 years at the São Paulo State University.
These will participate simultaneously in the two groups: Group 1 mepivacaine (MEP) and Group 2 articaine (ART), and the division will be performed by randomization, so that each patient will have each side (right or left) allocated in different groups.
The primary evaluation variable will be to compare the pain index in the immediate postoperative period, using Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and will also analyze Hemodynamic Parameters, such as Patient and Operator satisfaction.
The results will be submitted to qualitative and quantitative statistical analysis.
The descriptive data will be compared using the statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test with a significance level of 5%.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
7
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
SP
-
São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil, 12245000
- Michelle Bianchi de Moraes
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years to 40 years (ADULT, CHILD)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification -(ASA I) patients;
- Patients with need for extraction of lower third molars included and / or semi-included;
- Teeth in opposing hemiarch with the same classifications as Pell and Gregory and Winter;
- Age between 16 and 40 years;
- Patients who agree to voluntarily participate in the survey.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of allergic reactions (hypersensitivity) to anesthetics;
- Patients presenting with local or systemic alterations that contraindicate the procedure;
- Current use of drugs that may interfere with the action of anesthetics;
- Need for sedatives or anxiolytic drugs during extraction;
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
- Third erupted lower third molars.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group 1-Pain monitor
Use of the anesthetic Mepivacaine 2% in third molar extraction
|
Use of the anesthetic Articaine 4% in third molar extraction and evaluation in postoperative
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group 2 -Pain monitor
Use of the anesthetic Articaine 4% in third molar extraction
|
Use of the anesthetic Mepivacaine 2% in third molar extraction and evaluation in postoperative
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain assessment
Time Frame: The scale will be provided on paper and divided into postoperative hours up to 3 days.
|
Evaluated in patients in groups 1 and 2. Scale of Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with values from zero to ten, being zero without pain and ten the maximum of pain.
This scale will be provided on paper and divided into postoperative hours up to 3 days.
|
The scale will be provided on paper and divided into postoperative hours up to 3 days.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Assessment of blood pressure change
Time Frame: Observed and recorded immediately before application of the anesthetic solution, at 5, 20 and 70 minutes after the application of anesthesia
|
Evaluated in patients submitted to the exodontia of third molars, with different types of anesthetics.The investigator evaluated with auscultatory instrument.
|
Observed and recorded immediately before application of the anesthetic solution, at 5, 20 and 70 minutes after the application of anesthesia
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Assessment of heart rate change
Time Frame: Observed and recorded immediately before application of the anesthetic solution, at 5, 20 and 70 minutes after the application of anesthesia
|
Evaluated in patients submitted to the exodontia of third molars.
|
Observed and recorded immediately before application of the anesthetic solution, at 5, 20 and 70 minutes after the application of anesthesia
|
Assessment of oxygen saturation change
Time Frame: Observed and recorded immediately before application of the anesthetic solution, at 5, 20 and 70 minutes after the application of anesthesia
|
Evaluated in patients submitted to the exodontia of third molars
|
Observed and recorded immediately before application of the anesthetic solution, at 5, 20 and 70 minutes after the application of anesthesia
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michelle B Moraes, PHD, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho-Unesp
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Brockmann WG. Mepivacaine: a closer look at its properties and current utility. Gen Dent. 2014 Nov-Dec;62(6):70-5; quiz 76.
- Colombini BL, Modena KC, Calvo AM, Sakai VT, Giglio FP, Dionisio TJ, Trindade AS Jr, Lauris JR, Santos CF. Articaine and mepivacaine efficacy in postoperative analgesia for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Aug;102(2):169-74. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.09.003. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
- Gregorio LV, Giglio FP, Sakai VT, Modena KC, Colombini BL, Calvo AM, Sipert CR, Dionisio TJ, Lauris JR, Faria FA, Trindade Junior AS, Santos CF. A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (both with 1:200,000 epinephrine) for lower third molar removal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Jul;106(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.11.024. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
- Holliday R, Jackson I. Superior position of the mandibular foramen and the necessary alterations in the local anaesthetic technique: a case report. Br Dent J. 2011 Mar 12;210(5):207-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.145.
- McCoy JM. Complications of retention: pathology associated with retained third molars. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2012 Sep;20(2):177-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cxom.2012.06.002. No abstract available.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
December 7, 2017
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
October 30, 2018
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
December 4, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 22, 2017
First Posted (ACTUAL)
December 27, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
February 6, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 5, 2019
Last Verified
February 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ICT-UNESP
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
Flowonix MedicalApproved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinZealand University Hospital; European Regional Development Fund; Design School...CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, CancerGermany
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
Universitat Jaume ICompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | OncologySpain
-
Dr. Negrin University HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicSpain
-
George Washington UniversityRecruitingCervical Fusion | Pain, Back | Pain, Neck | Myofacial PainUnited States
-
University of Campinas, BrazilCompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedPain, Radiating | Pain, Burning | Pain, Crushing | Pain, Migratory | Pain, SplittingUnited States, France, Spain, Poland, Portugal
-
susanne beckerSNSFCompletedLow Back Pain | Pain, Acute | Pain, ChronicSwitzerland
Clinical Trials on Group 2 -Pain monitor
-
Universitat Jaume INot yet recruiting
-
Hopital FochTerminated
-
Hopital FochCompleted
-
KK Women's and Children's HospitalCompletedPreterm BirthSingapore
-
Mayo ClinicWithdrawnPhysical Activity | Blood Markers | Cardiac Rehab
-
Christian RiberholtSENS Innovation ApsActive, not recruiting
-
Rush University Medical CenterUniversity of Illinois at Chicago; Michigan State UniversityActive, not recruitingPhysical ActivityUnited States
-
University of Alabama, TuscaloosaPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; East Carolina University; Whatley...CompletedPain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Widespread Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Due to InjuryUnited States
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridNot yet recruiting