Future Patient - Telerehabilitation of Heart Failure Patients

May 26, 2021 updated by: Birthe Dinesen, Aalborg University

The idea behind the Future Patient research project is to develop a telerehabilitation program and tools for patients with heart failure.

The hypothesis for this study is that participation in a telerehabilitation program for patients with heart failure will increase the patients' quality of life and multi-parametric (subjective and objective) individualized monitoring in a telerehabilitation program for patients with heart failure will increase detection of worsening of symptoms and avoid future hospitalization of the HF-patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The overall aim is to test, implement and evaluate a telerehabilitation program for patients with heart failure from clinical, psychosocial, health literacy and e-health literacy, inter-organizational, health economic and technical perspectives.

Furthermore, this study has sub aims:

  • To increase the quality of life for patients with Heart Failure (HF)
  • To optimize the medical treatment of patients with HF
  • To perform multi-parametric (subjective and objective) individualized monitoring in order to detect worsening of symptoms and avoid hospitalizations
  • To increase physical activities for patients with heart failure in everyday life in a telerehabilitation program
  • To facilitate patient-initiated self-care management actions upon the following early detection of changes in source data (steps taken, weight, blood pressure, pulse, sleep, illness perception, motivation, anxiety and depression)
  • To evaluate patients health literacy and e-health literacy participating in a telerehabilitation program and rehabilitation program
  • To test and evaluate the Heart Portal - a digital toolbox for improved self-management for patients with heart failure and their relatives
  • To explore the experiences and perspectives of the patients and their relatives when being part of a telerehabilitation program
  • To test and evaluate a cross sector communication platform from a patient and healthcare professional perspective
  • To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of total costs of healthcare and rehabilitation services

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Viborg, Denmark, 8800
        • Cardiology Ward, Viborg Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with HF according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I-IV with max 20 % in class I or who have a current hospitalization for acute decompensated HF within the past two weeks
  • Adults (18 years or older); no upper age limit
  • Patients living in Viborg and Skive Municipality
  • Living at home and capable of caring for him/herself
  • Have basic computer skills or a relative who have basic computer skills
  • Informed consent to participate in a telerehabilitation program
  • May have a pacemaker

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Drug addiction defined as the use of cannabis, opioids or other drugs
  • Previous neurologic, musculoskeletal or cognitive disability or active psychiatric history (as noted in the medical record) other than depression or anxiety related to cardiac or other chronic illness
  • Lack of ability to cooperate
  • Does not speak Danish

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention group

The intervention group has three steps:

Step I: Titration of medicine ( 0-3 months)

Step II: Telerehabilitation program at healthcare center or by call center ( 3 months)

Step III: Rehabilitation in everyday life ( 6 months)

The patients is monitoring vital signs such as blood pressure, pulse, weight, steps, respiration, and sleep. Have access to a Heart Portal that is an information cite on heart failure. Via the portal patients can see measured values & communicate with staff. Every other week the patients fill in an online questionnaires on symptoms, sleep and well being.

Blood pressure (A&D Medical UA 767PBT), weight (A&D Medical UC-321PBT), step counters(Fitbit Zip & Charge), sleep sensor (Beddit 3), tablet (iPAD Air 2) & transmitter (Qualcomm Life, QWH-HUB-V1.0E)
NO_INTERVENTION: Traditional rehabilitation group

This group follows the International Cardiac Guidelines. There are three steps in this arm:

Step I: Titration of medicine (3 months).

Step II: Traditional rehabilitation at the healthcare center ( 3 months).

Step III: Everyday life with HF ( 6 months)

The participants do not have access to the Heart Portal and is not monitoring any vital signs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Increased quality of life
Time Frame: Intervention group: At baseline, week 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32, 34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50,52 Control group: Baseline, 6 & 12 months
Increased quality of life as measured by a moderate change (10 points) in quality of life measured by Kansas City Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Intervention group: At baseline, week 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32, 34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50,52 Control group: Baseline, 6 & 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time from baseline to optimized medical treatment
Time Frame: For both intervention and control group: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression with medical treatment, assessed up to 4 months
Time for optimizing medicine
For both intervention and control group: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression with medical treatment, assessed up to 4 months
All cause hospitalization
Time Frame: For both intervention and control group: 6 months
All-cause hospitalization at end of rehabilitation
For both intervention and control group: 6 months
Steps taken
Time Frame: Intervention group: Everyday for 12 months
Numbers of steps taken in the intervention group
Intervention group: Everyday for 12 months
Development of bloodpressure
Time Frame: Intervention group: Blood pressure (mmHG) from date of randomization twice a week assessed up to 3 months
Intervention group: Blood pressure (mmHG)
Intervention group: Blood pressure (mmHG) from date of randomization twice a week assessed up to 3 months
Development of pulse
Time Frame: Intervention group: Pulse from date of randomization and every day in 12 months
Intervention group: Pulse ( numbers per minutes)
Intervention group: Pulse from date of randomization and every day in 12 months
Development of weight
Time Frame: Intervention group: Weight from date of randomization and every day in 12 months
Intervention group: Weight (Kilograms)
Intervention group: Weight from date of randomization and every day in 12 months
Sleep
Time Frame: Intervention group: Sleep from date of randomization and accessed up to 12 months
Intervention group: Sleep ( numbers of hours per night)
Intervention group: Sleep from date of randomization and accessed up to 12 months
Illness perception
Time Frame: For Intervention and control group: At baseline, 6 & 12 months
Positive changes in illness perceptions, from dysfunctional to functional measured by Illness perception questionaire
For Intervention and control group: At baseline, 6 & 12 months
Motivation
Time Frame: For both intervention and control group: At baseline, 6 & 12 months
Changes from extrinsic to intrinsic motivation measured from baseline to end of rehabilitation and 6 months after end of rehabilitation measured by Health Climate Change Questionaire
For both intervention and control group: At baseline, 6 & 12 months
Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: For both intervention and control group: At baseline, 6 & 12 months
Explore whether levels of anxiety and depression in the intervention group are lower or equivalent to the control group measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire
For both intervention and control group: At baseline, 6 & 12 months
Health- literacy
Time Frame: For both intervention and control group: At baseline
Health literacy in intervention and control group measured by Health Literacy Questionnaire (Danish validated version HLQ) by units on a scale
For both intervention and control group: At baseline
eHealth literacy
Time Frame: For both intervention and control group: At baseline, 6 & 12 months
Improvement in e-health literacy in intervention and control group measured by eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (Danish validated version eHLQ) by units on a scale
For both intervention and control group: At baseline, 6 & 12 months
Experiences of using the Heart portal
Time Frame: For intervention group: 6 & 12 months
Qualitative exploration of experiences of HF patients, relatives and healthcare professionals use of the Heart portal
For intervention group: 6 & 12 months
Costs of healthcare and rehabilitation services
Time Frame: For both intervention and control group: 6 months
Number of hospitalizations, number of contacts with heart failure clinic, days at hospital, contacts with general practitioners, number of participations in rehabilitation activities at healthcare center between intervention and control group
For both intervention and control group: 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 21, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 25, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • N-20160055

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No plan for sharing protocol as we are applying for patent.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Telerehabilitation

3
Subscribe