Evaluation of Optimal Ablation Index for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With AF Prospective Registry

March 16, 2020 updated by: Eue-Keun Choi, Seoul National University Hospital

Evaluation of OPTIMal Ablation Index for pUlMonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (OPTIMUM) Prospective Registry

In this study, the investigators identify the optimal AI value for achieving good acute outcomes in PVI.

Through the Phase 1 study, the investigators will prospectively analyze data including ablation parameters, AI and acute outcomes of 20 patients performed PVI with conventional ablation strategy (AI-blinded).

After Phase 1 study results, optimal target AI value for each predefined PV segment will be determined. Then, by applying optimal AI values derived from the Phase 1 study, the investigators will evaluate the feasibility of the AI-guided procedure and verify the optimal AI value for acute PVI outcomes in the prospectively enrolled patients (n = 30) in the Phase 2 study.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

  1. Phase 1 A total of 30 240 patients with AF will be prospectively and consecutively enrolled and applied conventional ablation strategy with AI-blinded using contact force sensing catheter (Thermocool SmartTouch Catheter, Biosense Webster Inc.). Conventional ablation will be performed signal reduction-guided, point by point ablation using Visitag automated annotation criteria (2520-35W, target contact force 10-20g30g, target time: 30-40sec for anterior/roof segments, 2015-30sec for posterior/inferior segments).

    AI value will be derived from comprehensive off-line analysis of ablation parameters including contact force, time, power and AI of these 30 240 patients by predefined 14 segments.

    Through comparison of AI of each segment with or without acute outcomes including PV residual potential after first encirclement/early reconnection (ER)/dormant conduction (DC), minimal AI value would be drawndetermined, and optimal AI value will be suggested for future AI-guided ablation strategy Phase 2 study (AI-guided ablation strategy).

  2. Phase 2 The Phase 2 study aims to evaluate the feasibility of applying optimal AI values derived from the Phase 1 study, and to verify optimal values through AI-guided ablation. Thirty patients with AF will be prospectively and consecutively enrolled. AI information will be opened to the operator during ablation, and Visitag annotation criteria will also be used for AI-guided ablation with pre-set minimum target values for each segment derived from the Phase 1 study. After the procedure, the proportion of ablation points within the target AI value will be calculated by evaluation of the feasibility of the AI-guided ablation strategy. Acute outcomes of PVI including PV residual potential after first encirclement, ER, and DC will be evaluated based on predefined segments.
  3. Comparison of conventional vs. AI-guided ablation The investigators will compare the acute outcomes of PVI using two different strategies: conventional vs. AI-guided ablation. During 1 year of follow-up in both groups, AF recurrence will be evaluated at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months using rhythm surveillance (ECG or 24-hour Holter monitoring). The AF recurrence rate at 1 year after PVI will be compared between the two groups. In addition, total ablation time, fluoroscopic time, procedure time, and complication rates for the index procedure will be compared between the two groups.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Korean

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 20 to 80 years old
  • Patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF who had failed with anti-arrhythmic agents

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had previous ablation for AF
  • Patients with left atrial (LA) diameter more than 50mm
  • Inability or unwillingness to receive oral anticoagulation with a Vitamin K antagonist (VKA)or non-VKA (NOAC) agent
  • Known severe left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction<35%)
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
recurrence of a-fib
Time Frame: 1 year
Early recurrence and late recurrence(after 1-year)
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Euekeun Choi, M.D. Ph.D., Seoul National University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 23, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 9, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OPTIMUM

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Radiofrequency catheter ablation

Subscribe