Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Use of the Therapeutic Bandage Method in Third Molar Surgery

October 9, 2018 updated by: Michelle Bianchi de Moraes, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Use of the Therapeutic Bandage Method in Third Molar Surgery. Splint-mouth Randomized Blind Controlled Clinical Trial

Extraction of lower third molars semi-included or included is one of the most performed procedures in oral surgery, and inherent to the procedure there is a postoperative inflammatory response. Among the factors most routine to this response are pain, edema and trismus. The therapy taping has advantages in its use in the physiotherapy of several specialities, leading to the correction of muscular functions, reduction of edema, muscular spasms and reduction of pain. Thus, the objective of this split mouth, randomized, blind, clinical trial will be to evaluate the postoperative period of 32 third molars in the patients from the São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos, Brasil. These evaluations will be performed on the third and seventh days after the extraction, where the patients will be analyzed by evaluator who will measure the edema, the opening of the mouth (evaluation of muscle spasm) and collect the pain table delivered in the immediate postoperative period, comparing thus, the benefit of therapeutic banding in the postoperative period of the extraction of lower third molars. The analogue pain scale (VAS), together with the Ustün et al. (2003) and the millimeter rule will be used to compare the data and the results will be submitted to descriptive statistics and compared by means of the statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test with significance level of 5%.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Extraction of third molars is the procedure of oral and maxillofacial surgery most commonly performed around the world, usually at the outpatient level. Its execution may result in the appearance of reversible and / or irreversible disorders, but the most observed signs and symptoms are pain, edema and trismus to a greater or lesser degree. Thus, there seems to be no consensus within the literature for a better type of post-surgical treatment that leads to less patient discomfort when undergoing this kind of surgery.

The objective of this randomized, blinded trial will be to evaluate the use of therapeutic bandaging, Therapy Tex ©, In reducing the signs and symptoms inherent to the postoperative period of the third molar extracts, semi-included or included .

The sample will consist of 32 lower third molars, semi-inclusively or included, divided into two groups simultaneously, namely:

Group I (16 teeth) - without therapeutic bandaging on face. Group II (16 teeth) - with therapeutic bandaging on face. The therapeutic bandaging method will be applied in the patients of group II, according to the previous randomization.The bandage will be applied immediately after surgery and before the end of the anesthetic effect. The skin should be cleaned with 70% alcohol in order to remove residue and oiliness, and then should be dried. If necessary, scrape the hairs of the region in which the tape will rest. The application of the bandage will be in the proposed regions using the "I" cutout, in which no additional trimming is made on the tape. The length may vary depending on the size of the patient's face. After being applied the bandage should be gently wiped to activate the acrylic components that generate adhesiveness and should remain on the face for 3 days.

The patient is asked to occlude, the dimension of the masseter muscle is determined by palpation. During palpation, point A is selected in the lower portion of the zygomatic arch and point B is close to the angle of the mandible. The tape will be placed along the direction of the muscle fibers.

Placement of the second tape will occur from the mandibular angle to the mental symphysis, accompanying the entire mandibular body in its medial portion covering the milo-hyoid muscles and the anterior belly of the digastric.

The results of the clinical evaluations will be submitted to descriptive statistics and compared by means of the statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test with significance level of 5%.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SP
      • São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil, 12245000
        • Michelle Bianchi de Moraes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 40 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with need for extraction of third molars, regardless of gender;
  2. Teeth in opposite hemiarches with similar positions;
  3. Between 15 and 40 years of age;
  4. That they agree to participate in the research voluntarily.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients presenting with local or systemic alterations that contraindicate the procedure;
  2. Use of anti-inflammatories in the last 15 days;
  3. Third lower third molars in position and different inclusion classification on both sides;
  4. Third erupted lower third molars.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Group I
Extraction third molar with pre and postoperative evaluation of edema, pain and trismus
Extraction third molar with the application of therapeutic bandaging in the face and with evaluation of edema, pain and trismus
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group II
Extraction third molar with therapeutic bandage pre and postoperative evaluation of edema, pain and trismus
Extraction third molar without the application of therapeutic bandaging in the face and with evaluation of edema, pain and trismus

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain assessment
Time Frame: The scale will be provided on paper and divided into postoperative hours up to 3 days for the patient to note the degree of pain that varies between zero and ten
Evaluated in patients in groups I and II. Scale of vas, with values from zero to ten, being zero without pain and ten the maximum of pain. This scale will be provided on paper and divided into postoperative hours up to 3 days.
The scale will be provided on paper and divided into postoperative hours up to 3 days for the patient to note the degree of pain that varies between zero and ten

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Edema assessment with a millimeter rule.
Time Frame: For investigators to measure facial edema, with pre and postoperative evaluations of 3 and 7 days
Evaluated in patients in groups I and II. Used the method of Ustün et al. (2003) with a millimeter rule to obtain the measures.
For investigators to measure facial edema, with pre and postoperative evaluations of 3 and 7 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trismus assessment with a millimeter rule.
Time Frame: To measure the buccal opening, the distance between the incisal edges of the maxillary and mandibular incisors, obtained with the patient sitting upright. Evaluated in the pre and postoperative periods of 3 and 7 days
Evaluated in patients in groups I and II
To measure the buccal opening, the distance between the incisal edges of the maxillary and mandibular incisors, obtained with the patient sitting upright. Evaluated in the pre and postoperative periods of 3 and 7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michelle B Moraes, PHD, Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 20, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 4, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 4, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Unesp

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Group II

Subscribe