Increasing HPV Vaccination in Community-Based Pediatric Practices

December 3, 2023 updated by: Pamela Hull

The central goal of this study is to identify the optimal approach to implementing an evidence-based practice facilitation (PF) intervention for the uptake and completion of HPV vaccine among adolescents receiving care in the community, guided by implementation science theory.

AIM 1: Determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two modalities for delivering a multi-component PF intervention to increase HPV vaccination initiation and completion in community-based pediatric practices. The investigators will compare the traditional In-person Coaching PF modality to a lower-resource Web-Based Coaching PF modality. The primary patient outcome is HPV vaccination. The investigators will also examine and compare the sustainability of practice changes on vaccination rates and the effects over time for each intervention modality.

AIM 2. Understand mechanisms of why the PF intervention may work better for some pediatric practices than others for HPV vaccination. The investigators will examine theory-based determinants at the organizational, provider, and patient levels that may mediate (explain) or moderate (change) the effects of the PF intervention on vaccination outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background:

The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine offers the unprecedented opportunity to prevent nearly all cervical and anal cancers and a high proportion of vaginal, oropharyngeal, vulvar and penile cancers, where HPV is the etiologic agent. HPV vaccination is recommended for all children ages 11-12, with catch up for females to age 26 and males to age 21. However, despite clear and indisputable value in cancer prevention, uptake and completion of the HPV vaccine series has lagged far behind the goal of 80%. Provider recommendation is the strongest determinant of HPV vaccination, but slow translation of guidelines for preventive services, such as immunizations, into practice is a known challenge. Practice Facilitation (PF), also called quality improvement coaching, is a multicomponent quality improvement intervention approach that has well-established efficacy, in which external support and resources are provided to build the internal capacity of practices to improve quality of care and patient outcomes.

Objectives:

The central goal of the study is to identify the optimal approach to implementing an evidence-based intervention for the uptake and completion of HPV vaccine among adolescents receiving care in the community, guided by implementation science theory.

AIM 1: Determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two modalities for delivering a multi-component PF intervention to increase HPV vaccination initiation and completion in community-based pediatric practices.

The investigators will compare the traditional In-person Coaching modality to a lower-resource Web-Based Coaching modality. The primary patient outcome is HPV vaccination. The investigators will also examine and compare the sustainability of practice changes on vaccination rates and the effects over time for each intervention modality.

H1: Both interventions will result in significant increases in HPV vaccination from baseline over time.

H2: Increases in the rate of HPV vaccination will be higher and sustained for a longer period of time in the In-person Coaching PF Arm as compared with the Web-Based Coaching Arm.

H3: The Web-Based Coaching Arm will be more cost-effective than the In-person Coaching Arm.

AIM 2. Understand mechanisms of why the PF intervention may work better for some pediatric practices than others for HPV vaccination.

The investigators will examine theory-based determinants at the organizational, provider, and patient levels that may mediate (explain) or moderate (change) the effects of the PF intervention on vaccination outcomes.

H4: Adoption of changes (process variables) and patient factors will mediate effects of the intervention on HPV vaccination outcomes.

H5: Organizational factors, provider attitudes, and intervention characteristics will moderate intervention effects on HPV vaccination outcomes.

Implications:

The findings will inform organizations about which PF modality to use among their constituent practices to improve HPV vaccination rates, with potential for future national dissemination.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

420

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All providers and staff at each practice

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Web-Based Coaching
Web-based delivery of practice facilitation for HPV vaccine
The practice facilitation intervention provides coaching support to pediatric practices to guide them through quality improvement projects to increase HPV vaccination rates.
Experimental: In-Person Coaching
In-person delivery of practice facilitation for HPV vaccine
The practice facilitation intervention provides coaching support to pediatric practices to guide them through quality improvement projects to increase HPV vaccination rates.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Age-appropriate completion rate (ages 13-17)
Time Frame: Annually, up to 3 years post baseline
Percentage of active patients ages 13-17 who completed the HPV vaccine series before 13th birthday
Annually, up to 3 years post baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Age-appropriate initiation rate (ages 13-17)
Time Frame: Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Percentage of active patients ages 13-17 who received at least one dose of HPV vaccine before 13th birthday
Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Age-appropriate completion rate (at age 13)
Time Frame: Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Percentage of active patients who turned age 13 who completed the HPV vaccine series before 13th birthday
Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Age-appropriate initiation rate (at age 13)
Time Frame: Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Percentage of active patients who turned age 13 who received at least one dose of HPV vaccine before 13th birthday
Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Overall completion rate (ages 13-17)
Time Frame: Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Percentage of active patients ages 13-17 who completed the HPV vaccine series at any age
Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Overall initiation rate (ages 13-17)
Time Frame: Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Percentage of active patients ages 13-17 who received at least one dose of HPV vaccine at any age
Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Dose received rate (well visits)
Time Frame: Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Percentage of well visits in which a dose of HPV vaccine was administered (1st, 2nd, or 3rd dose), among all well visits for active vaccine-eligible patients ages 11-17
Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Dose received rate (all visits)
Time Frame: Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Percentage of visits in which a dose of HPV vaccine was administered (1st, 2nd, or 3rd dose), among all visits for active vaccine-eligible patients ages 11-17
Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Age at vaccination
Time Frame: Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Average age at receipt of first HPV vaccine dose, among active patients ages 13-17 who received 1st dose
Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Time to series completion
Time Frame: Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Average number of months from 1st dose to last dose of HPV vaccine, among active patients ages 13-17 who completed the series
Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Documented recommendation rate (well visits)
Time Frame: Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Percentage of well visits with documentation of HPV vaccine either administered, deferred or refused, among all well visits for active vaccine-eligible patients ages 11-17
Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Documented recommendation rate (all visits)
Time Frame: Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Percentage of visits with documentation of HPV vaccine either administered, deferred or refused, among all visits for active vaccine-eligible patients ages 11-17
Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Bundling adolescent vaccines rate
Time Frame: Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Percentage of visits in which HPV, meningococcal, and Tdap vaccines were administered, among all visits for active patients ages 11-12 in which Tdap was administered and patient was eligible for both HPV and meningococcal vaccines
Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Missed opportunities rate
Time Frame: Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline
Percentage of non-well visits in which HPV vaccine was not administered, among all visits for active vaccine-eligible patients ages 11-17
Monthly, up to 36 months post baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pamela C Hull, PhD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 21, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 171793
  • 1R01CA207401-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data collected from providers and staff (surveys and interviews) will be made available to other researchers upon request. All individual identifiers will be stripped to ensure confidentiality and privacy of study participants.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Upon request

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researcher with IRB approval

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HPV Vaccines

Clinical Trials on Practice facilitation for HPV vaccine

3
Subscribe