Study to Evaluate Switching From an E/C/F/TAF Fixed-Dose Combination (FDC) Regimen or a TDF Containing Regimen to B/F/TAF FDC in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) Infected Participants Aged ≥ 65 Years

November 6, 2020 updated by: Gilead Sciences

A Phase 3b, Multicenter, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Switching From an Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Fixed-Dose Combination Regimen or a Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Containing Regimen to Fixed-Dose Combination of Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in Elderly, Virologically-Suppressed, HIV-1 Infected Subjects Aged ≥ 65 Years

The primary objective of this study is to characterize the virologic efficacy of switching virologically suppressed participants on an elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) regimen or a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) containing regimen to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) FDC.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

86

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium, 1000
        • CHU Saint-Pierre
      • Ghent, Belgium, 9000
        • UZ Gent
      • Bordeaux, France, 33075
        • Hôpital Saint-André
      • Marseille, France, 13006
        • Hôpital Européen Marseille
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • C.H.U. de Nantes - Hotel Dieu
      • Nice, France, 6203
        • CHU de Nice
      • PARIS cedex 10, France, 75475
        • Hopital Saint Louis
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Hôpital Necker - Enfants Malades
      • Paris, France, 75571
        • Hopital Saint Antoine
      • Pessac, France, 33064
        • Interne et Maladies infectieuses
      • Tourcoing, France, 59208
        • CH de Tourcoing
      • Bergamo, Italy, 24127
        • ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII
      • Milano, Italy, 20157
        • ASST - Fatebenefratelli Sacco
      • Pescara, Italy, 65124
        • P.O. Spirito Santo - U.O. Malattie Infettive e Tropicali
      • Roma, Italy, 00149
        • IRCCS Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani
      • Badalona, Spain, 8916
        • Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08026
        • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
      • Madrid, Spain, 28034
        • Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
      • Madrid, Spain, 28041
        • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz
      • Madrid, Spain, 28007
        • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon
      • Marbella, Spain, 29603
        • Hospital Costa del Sol
      • Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE1 4LP
        • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Currently receiving an antiretroviral regimen of E/C/F/TAF FDC (or emtricitabine [FTC]/TDF + 3rd agent if currently or previously participated in Study GS-US-292-1826 [NCT02616783]) for ≥ 3 months
  • Documented plasma HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) < 50 copies/mL during treatment with E/C/F/TAF (or FTC/TDF + 3rd agent if currently or previously participated in Study GS-US-292-1826 [NCT02616783]) for the last 2 visits preceding the screening visit (or undetectable HIV-1 RNA level according to the local assay being used if the limit of detection is ≥ 50 copies/mL)
  • Adequate renal function, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 mL/min according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula for creatinine clearance

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • An opportunistic illness indicative of stage 3 HIV diagnosed within the 30 days prior to screening
  • Decompensated cirrhosis (eg, ascites, encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding)
  • Current alcohol or substance use judged by the investigator to potentially interfere with participant study compliance

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/ Exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: B/F/TAF
B/F/TAF FDC for at least 96 weeks.
50/200/25 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily without regard to food.
Other Names:
  • Biktarvy®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 24 as Defined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 24
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined timepoint within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) Through Week 24
Time Frame: First dose date up to Week 24
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs may also included pre- or post-treatment complications that occurred as a result of protocol specified procedures, lack of efficacy, overdose, drug abuse/misuse reports, or occupational exposure. Preexisting events that increased in severity or changed in nature during or as a consequence of participation in the clinical study were also considered AEs.
First dose date up to Week 24
Percentage of Participants Experiencing AEs Through Week 48
Time Frame: First dose date Up to Week 48
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs may also included pre- or post-treatment complications that occurred as a result of protocol specified procedures, lack of efficacy, overdose, drug abuse/misuse reports, or occupational exposure. Preexisting events that increased in severity or changed in nature during or as a consequence of participation in the clinical study were also considered AEs.
First dose date Up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants Experiencing AEs Through Week 72
Time Frame: First dose date Up to Week 72
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs may also included pre- or post-treatment complications that occurred as a result of protocol specified procedures, lack of efficacy, overdose, drug abuse/misuse reports, or occupational exposure. Preexisting events that increased in severity or changed in nature during or as a consequence of participation in the clinical study were also considered AEs.
First dose date Up to Week 72
Percentage of Participants Experiencing AEs Through Week 96
Time Frame: First dose date Up to Week 96
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs may also included pre- or post-treatment complications that occurred as a result of protocol specified procedures, lack of efficacy, overdose, drug abuse/misuse reports, or occupational exposure. Preexisting events that increased in severity or changed in nature during or as a consequence of participation in the clinical study were also considered AEs.
First dose date Up to Week 96
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Defined by the FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 48
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined timepoint within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
Week 48
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 72 as Defined by the FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 72
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 72 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined timepoint within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
Week 72
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96 as Defined by the FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 96
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined timepoint within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
Week 96
Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48
Baseline, Week 48
Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
Baseline, Week 72
Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 96
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96
Baseline, Week 96
Change From Baseline in CD4 Percentage at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in CD4 Percentage at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48
Baseline, Week 48
Change From Baseline in CD4 Percentage at Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
Baseline, Week 72
Change From Baseline in CD4 Percentage at Week 96
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96
Baseline, Week 96
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 24, as Analyzed by Missing = Failure Approach
Time Frame: Week 24
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was analyzed using missing = failure approach. In this approach, all missing data were treated as HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL.
Week 24
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48, as Analyzed by Missing = Failure Approach
Time Frame: Week 48
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using missing = failure approach. In this approach, all missing data were treated as HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL.
Week 48
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 72, as Analyzed by Missing = Failure Approach
Time Frame: Week 72
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 72 was analyzed using missing = failure approach. In this approach, all missing data were treated as HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL.
Week 72
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96, as Analyzed by Missing = Failure Approach
Time Frame: Week 96
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using missing = failure approach. In this approach, all missing data were treated as HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL.
Week 96
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 24, as Analyzed by Missing = Excluded Approach
Time Frame: Week 24
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was analyzed using missing = excluded approach. In this approach, all missing data were excluded in the computation of the percentages (ie, missing data points were excluded from both the numerator and denominator in the computation).
Week 24
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48, as Analyzed by Missing = Excluded Approach
Time Frame: Week 48
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using missing = excluded approach. In this approach, all missing data were excluded in the computation of the percentages (ie, missing data points were excluded from both the numerator and denominator in the computation).
Week 48
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 72, as Analyzed by Missing = Excluded Approach
Time Frame: Week 72
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 72 was analyzed using missing = excluded approach. In this approach, all missing data were excluded in the computation of the percentages (ie, missing data points were excluded from both the numerator and denominator in the computation).
Week 72
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96, as Analyzed by Missing = Excluded Approach
Time Frame: Week 96
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using missing = excluded approach. In this approach, all missing data were excluded in the computation of the percentages (ie, missing data points were excluded from both the numerator and denominator in the computation).
Week 96

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 20, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 29, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GS-US-380-4449
  • 2017-003428-61 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Qualified external researchers may request IPD for this study after study completion. For more information, please visit our website at https://www.gilead.com/science-and-medicine/research/clinical-trials-transparency-and-data-sharing-policy.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

18 months after study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

A secured external environment with username, password, and RSA code.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV-1 Infection

Clinical Trials on B/F/TAF

3
Subscribe