- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03405935
Study to Evaluate Switching From an E/C/F/TAF Fixed-Dose Combination (FDC) Regimen or a TDF Containing Regimen to B/F/TAF FDC in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) Infected Participants Aged ≥ 65 Years
November 6, 2020 updated by: Gilead Sciences
A Phase 3b, Multicenter, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Switching From an Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Fixed-Dose Combination Regimen or a Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Containing Regimen to Fixed-Dose Combination of Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in Elderly, Virologically-Suppressed, HIV-1 Infected Subjects Aged ≥ 65 Years
The primary objective of this study is to characterize the virologic efficacy of switching virologically suppressed participants on an elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) regimen or a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) containing regimen to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) FDC.
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
86
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Brussels, Belgium, 1000
- CHU Saint-Pierre
-
Ghent, Belgium, 9000
- UZ Gent
-
-
-
-
-
Bordeaux, France, 33075
- Hôpital Saint-André
-
Marseille, France, 13006
- Hôpital Européen Marseille
-
Nantes, France, 44093
- C.H.U. de Nantes - Hotel Dieu
-
Nice, France, 6203
- CHU de Nice
-
PARIS cedex 10, France, 75475
- Hopital Saint Louis
-
Paris, France, 75015
- Hôpital Necker - Enfants Malades
-
Paris, France, 75571
- Hopital Saint Antoine
-
Pessac, France, 33064
- Interne et Maladies infectieuses
-
Tourcoing, France, 59208
- CH de Tourcoing
-
-
-
-
-
Bergamo, Italy, 24127
- ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII
-
Milano, Italy, 20157
- ASST - Fatebenefratelli Sacco
-
Pescara, Italy, 65124
- P.O. Spirito Santo - U.O. Malattie Infettive e Tropicali
-
Roma, Italy, 00149
- IRCCS Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani
-
-
-
-
-
Badalona, Spain, 8916
- Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08036
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08035
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08026
- Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
-
Madrid, Spain, 28034
- Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
-
Madrid, Spain, 28041
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
-
Madrid, Spain, 28046
- Hospital Universitario La Paz
-
Madrid, Spain, 28007
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon
-
Marbella, Spain, 29603
- Hospital Costa del Sol
-
-
-
-
-
Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE1 4LP
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
65 years and older (OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Currently receiving an antiretroviral regimen of E/C/F/TAF FDC (or emtricitabine [FTC]/TDF + 3rd agent if currently or previously participated in Study GS-US-292-1826 [NCT02616783]) for ≥ 3 months
- Documented plasma HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) < 50 copies/mL during treatment with E/C/F/TAF (or FTC/TDF + 3rd agent if currently or previously participated in Study GS-US-292-1826 [NCT02616783]) for the last 2 visits preceding the screening visit (or undetectable HIV-1 RNA level according to the local assay being used if the limit of detection is ≥ 50 copies/mL)
- Adequate renal function, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 mL/min according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula for creatinine clearance
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- An opportunistic illness indicative of stage 3 HIV diagnosed within the 30 days prior to screening
- Decompensated cirrhosis (eg, ascites, encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding)
- Current alcohol or substance use judged by the investigator to potentially interfere with participant study compliance
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/ Exclusion criteria may apply.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: B/F/TAF
B/F/TAF FDC for at least 96 weeks.
|
50/200/25 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily without regard to food.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 24 as Defined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 24
|
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined timepoint within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
|
Week 24
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) Through Week 24
Time Frame: First dose date up to Week 24
|
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
AEs may also included pre- or post-treatment complications that occurred as a result of protocol specified procedures, lack of efficacy, overdose, drug abuse/misuse reports, or occupational exposure.
Preexisting events that increased in severity or changed in nature during or as a consequence of participation in the clinical study were also considered AEs.
|
First dose date up to Week 24
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing AEs Through Week 48
Time Frame: First dose date Up to Week 48
|
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
AEs may also included pre- or post-treatment complications that occurred as a result of protocol specified procedures, lack of efficacy, overdose, drug abuse/misuse reports, or occupational exposure.
Preexisting events that increased in severity or changed in nature during or as a consequence of participation in the clinical study were also considered AEs.
|
First dose date Up to Week 48
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing AEs Through Week 72
Time Frame: First dose date Up to Week 72
|
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
AEs may also included pre- or post-treatment complications that occurred as a result of protocol specified procedures, lack of efficacy, overdose, drug abuse/misuse reports, or occupational exposure.
Preexisting events that increased in severity or changed in nature during or as a consequence of participation in the clinical study were also considered AEs.
|
First dose date Up to Week 72
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing AEs Through Week 96
Time Frame: First dose date Up to Week 96
|
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
AEs may also included pre- or post-treatment complications that occurred as a result of protocol specified procedures, lack of efficacy, overdose, drug abuse/misuse reports, or occupational exposure.
Preexisting events that increased in severity or changed in nature during or as a consequence of participation in the clinical study were also considered AEs.
|
First dose date Up to Week 96
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Defined by the FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 48
|
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined timepoint within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
|
Week 48
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 72 as Defined by the FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 72
|
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 72 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined timepoint within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
|
Week 72
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96 as Defined by the FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 96
|
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defined a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined timepoint within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
|
Week 96
|
Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
|
Baseline, Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48
|
Baseline, Week 48
|
|
Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 96
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96
|
Baseline, Week 96
|
|
Change From Baseline in CD4 Percentage at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
|
Baseline, Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in CD4 Percentage at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48
|
Baseline, Week 48
|
|
Change From Baseline in CD4 Percentage at Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
Change From Baseline in CD4 Percentage at Week 96
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96
|
Baseline, Week 96
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 24, as Analyzed by Missing = Failure Approach
Time Frame: Week 24
|
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was analyzed using missing = failure approach.
In this approach, all missing data were treated as HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL.
|
Week 24
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48, as Analyzed by Missing = Failure Approach
Time Frame: Week 48
|
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using missing = failure approach.
In this approach, all missing data were treated as HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL.
|
Week 48
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 72, as Analyzed by Missing = Failure Approach
Time Frame: Week 72
|
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 72 was analyzed using missing = failure approach.
In this approach, all missing data were treated as HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL.
|
Week 72
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96, as Analyzed by Missing = Failure Approach
Time Frame: Week 96
|
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using missing = failure approach.
In this approach, all missing data were treated as HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL.
|
Week 96
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 24, as Analyzed by Missing = Excluded Approach
Time Frame: Week 24
|
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was analyzed using missing = excluded approach.
In this approach, all missing data were excluded in the computation of the percentages (ie, missing data points were excluded from both the numerator and denominator in the computation).
|
Week 24
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48, as Analyzed by Missing = Excluded Approach
Time Frame: Week 48
|
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using missing = excluded approach.
In this approach, all missing data were excluded in the computation of the percentages (ie, missing data points were excluded from both the numerator and denominator in the computation).
|
Week 48
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 72, as Analyzed by Missing = Excluded Approach
Time Frame: Week 72
|
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 72 was analyzed using missing = excluded approach.
In this approach, all missing data were excluded in the computation of the percentages (ie, missing data points were excluded from both the numerator and denominator in the computation).
|
Week 72
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96, as Analyzed by Missing = Excluded Approach
Time Frame: Week 96
|
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using missing = excluded approach.
In this approach, all missing data were excluded in the computation of the percentages (ie, missing data points were excluded from both the numerator and denominator in the computation).
|
Week 96
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
March 1, 2018
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
November 20, 2018
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
May 29, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 12, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 12, 2018
First Posted (ACTUAL)
January 23, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
December 1, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 6, 2020
Last Verified
November 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- GS-US-380-4449
- 2017-003428-61 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Qualified external researchers may request IPD for this study after study completion.
For more information, please visit our website at https://www.gilead.com/science-and-medicine/research/clinical-trials-transparency-and-data-sharing-policy.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
18 months after study completion
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
A secured external environment with username, password, and RSA code.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on HIV-1 Infection
-
Sociedad Andaluza de Enfermedades InfecciosasConsejeria de Salud. Junta de Andalucia. SpainCompletedHIV Infection | HIV-1 InfectionSpain
-
Helios SaludViiV HealthcareUnknownHiv | HIV-1-infectionArgentina
-
Frontier Biotechnologies Inc.RecruitingHIV-1-infectionUnited States
-
University of ZurichActive, not recruitingHIV-1-infectionSwitzerland
-
MacroGenicsNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)CompletedHIV-1-infectionUnited States
-
Fundación FLS de Lucha Contra el Sida, las Enfermedades...Aelix TherapeuticsCompleted
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)CompletedHIV-1 InfectionUnited States
-
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanCompleted
-
Shanghai Public Health Clinical CenterUnknown
-
Fundación FLS de Lucha Contra el Sida, las Enfermedades...Completed
Clinical Trials on B/F/TAF
-
Gilead SciencesRecruitingHIV-1 InfectionUnited States, Thailand, Uganda, South Africa
-
Gilead SciencesCompletedHIV-1-infectionUnited States, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Thailand
-
Gilead SciencesRecruitingHIV-1-infectionUnited States, France, Canada
-
Tulika Singh, MDGilead SciencesRecruitingHIV-1-infectionUnited States
-
Shanghai Public Health Clinical CenterYunnan AIDS Care Center; Xixi Hospital of HangzhouActive, not recruiting
-
Gilead SciencesNot yet recruiting
-
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute...Not yet recruiting
-
Gilead SciencesCompleted
-
Gilead SciencesRecruiting
-
Gilead SciencesCompletedHIV-1 InfectionSpain, United States, Italy, Germany, United Kingdom, France, Australia, Puerto Rico, Canada, Belgium, Dominican Republic