- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03421028
Evaluation of Biofeedback Therapy Efficiency in Masticatory Muscles Pain Management
The Evaluation of EMG-biofeedback Therapy Efficiency in Management of Masticatory Muscles Pain
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The Aim:
The aim of the study is to evaluate beneficial effects of biofeedback therapy in reducing pain, increased tension of masticatory muscles occurring in patients with myogenous TMD and if the therapy influences psychological and sleep parameters. Also to verify if the effect of the therapy persists in time.
Patients:
- Experimental group 1 - patients diagnosed with myalgia subjected to 4 EMG-Biofeedback trainings. The group will include approximately 20 adults.
- Experimental group 2 - patients diagnosed with myalgia subjected to 8 EMG-Biofeedback trainings. The group will include approximately 20 adults.
- Control group - patients diagnosed with myalgia subjected to physiotherapy (manual therapy), stabilization splint usage and counseling (20 adults).
- Methods:
Adult patients diagnosed with masticatory muscles myalgia will be included in this study. All participants will be evaluated in accordance to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Intensity of pain in the masticatory muscles will be defined using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The pressure pain threshold (PPT) will be assessed with an dolorimeter and noticed on DC/TMD pain drawing diagram. Each of the qualified patients will also undergo the electromyography of temporal and masseter muscles. All participants will fill in questionnaires (Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) and Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8).
Patients qualified to the experimental groups will be divided in to 2 subgroups composed of 20 participants each.
Experimental group 1 will undergo a cycle of 4 meetings (1 per week) of 20 minute EMG-Biofeedback- assisted training decreasing the masseter and temporalis muscle tension. 10 minutes of training for each group of muscle.
Experimental group 2 will undergo a cycle of 8 meetings (1 per week) of 20 minute EMG-Biofeedback- assisted training decreasing the masseter and temporalis muscle tension. 10 minutes of training for each group of muscle.
Postcycle examination:
After completing the cycle, patients from the study group and control group will be reevaluated. All participants will be evaluated in accordance to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Intensity of pain in the masticatory muscles will be defined using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The pressure pain threshold (PPT) will be assessed with an dolorimeter and noticed on DC/TMD pain drawing diagram. Each of the qualified patients will also undergo the electromyography of temporal and masseter muscles. All participants will fill in questionnaires (Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) and Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8).
The postcycle examination will take place after last planned training and during follow-ups - 6 and 12 weeks after completion of EMG-Biofeedback therapy.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Wojciech Florjański, D.M.D.P.H.D.
- Phone Number: +48783602042
- Email: wojciech.florjanski@umed.wroc.pl
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Mieszko Więckiewicz, D.M.D.Ph.D.
- Email: m.wieckiewicz@onet.pl
Study Locations
-
-
Dolny Śląsk
-
Wrocław, Dolny Śląsk, Poland
- Wroclaw Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosis of myalgia in accordance to Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders
- full dentition or single tooth loss
- age between 18 and 70
Exclusion Criteria:
- age under 18
- age over 70
- terminal general diseases
- severe mental disorders
- severe neurological disorders
- intake of drugs affecting muscle function
- edentulism or destruction of dentition
- alcoholism
- drug addiction
- history of severe trauma in the head and neck region
- severe pathology of temporomandibular joints
- congenital or acquired craniofacial deformity
- patients suffering from neuropathic pain
- patients with craniofacial inflammation
- patients undergoing orthodontic treatment
- pregnancy
- significant postural defect
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Control group
Patients with masticatory muscle pain treated with occlusal splint, physiotherapy and counseling
|
Combination of physiotherapy (manual therapy), stabilization occlusal splint usage and counseling
|
|
Experimental: Experimental group 1
Patients diagnosed with masticatory muscle pain treated with 4 meetings of EMG-biofeedback assisted training
|
EMG-Biofeedback- assisted training is a method in which electrodes situated on the surface of the skin detect small voltage changes which arise from the working muscles (in this case masseter and temporalis muscles).
The voltage is transformed into a visual or sound time-variable signal which gives the patient feedback as he willingly tries to change the muscle tension (in this case to lower the excessive masseter tension)
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Experimental group 2
Patients diagnosed with masticatory muscle pain treated with 8 meetings of EMG-biofeedback
|
EMG-Biofeedback- assisted training is a method in which electrodes situated on the surface of the skin detect small voltage changes which arise from the working muscles (in this case masseter and temporalis muscles).
The voltage is transformed into a visual or sound time-variable signal which gives the patient feedback as he willingly tries to change the muscle tension (in this case to lower the excessive masseter tension)
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on pain symptoms measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in Experimental group 1
Time Frame: before the treatment, after 4 weeks of training
|
This effect will be assessed by comparing Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pre- and post- biofeedback therapy.
A numerical rating scale (NRS) requires the patient to rate their pain on a scale 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable
|
before the treatment, after 4 weeks of training
|
|
The effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on pain symptoms measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in Experimental group 2
Time Frame: before the treatment, after 8 weeks of training
|
This effect will be assessed by comparing Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pre- and post- biofeedback therapy.
A numerical rating scale (NRS) requires the patient to rate their pain on a scale 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable
|
before the treatment, after 8 weeks of training
|
|
The effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on pain symptoms measured by pressure pain threshold in Experimental group 1
Time Frame: before the treatment, after 4 weeks of training
|
This effect will be assessed by comparing pressure pain threshold pre- and post- biofeedback therapy.
Pressure pain threshold will be measured with dolorimeter.
|
before the treatment, after 4 weeks of training
|
|
The effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on pain symptoms measured by pressure pain threshold in Experimental group 2
Time Frame: before the treatment, after 8 weeks of training
|
This effect will be assessed by comparing pressure pain threshold pre- and post- biofeedback therapy.
Pressure pain threshold will be measured with dolorimeter.
|
before the treatment, after 8 weeks of training
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on psychological parameters and its persistence in time measured by Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI).
Time Frame: before the treatment and up to 12 weeks after completion of the treatment
|
This effect will be assessed by comparing the results of Beck Anxiety Inventory.
Each participant will fill in Beck Anxiety Inventory pre- post therapy and during the follow-ups.
The total score is calculated by finding the sum of the 21 items.
Total score for all 21 symptoms that can range between 0 and 63 points.
A total score of 0 - 7 is interpreted as a "Minimal" level of anxiety; 8 - 15 as "Mild"; 16 - 25 as "Moderate", and; 26 - 63 as "Severe".
|
before the treatment and up to 12 weeks after completion of the treatment
|
|
Effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on psychological parameters and its persistence in time measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: before the treatment and up to 12 weeks after completion of the treatment
|
This effect will be assessed by comparing the results of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) .
Each participant will fill in Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 pre- post therapy and during the follow-ups.
PHQ-9 total score for the nine items ranges from 0 to 27.Scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent cutpoints for mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression, respectively.
|
before the treatment and up to 12 weeks after completion of the treatment
|
|
Effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on psychological parameters and its persistence in time measured by Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10)
Time Frame: before the treatment and up to 12 weeks after completion of the treatment
|
This effect will be assessed by comparing the results of Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10).
Each participant will fill in Perceived Stress Scale -10 pre- post therapy and during the follow-ups.
Scores are obtained by reversing the scores on the four positive items, e.g., 0=4, 1=3, 2=2, etc. and then summing across all 10 items.
Items 4,5, 7, and 8 are the positively stated items.
It can range from 0 to 40.
Scores ranging from 0-13 would be considered low stress,14-26 would be considered moderate stress, 27-40 would be considered high perceived stress.
|
before the treatment and up to 12 weeks after completion of the treatment
|
|
Effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on psychological parameters and its persistence in time measured by Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8).
Time Frame: before the treatment and up to 12 weeks after completion of the treatment
|
This effect will be assessed by comparing the results Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8).
Each participant will fill in Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8) pre- post therapy and during the follow-ups.
SSS-8 total score ranges from 0 to 32 points, where 0-3 points means no to minimal severity, 4-7 points - low severity, 8-11 points - medium severity, 12-15 points - high severity, 16-32 points - very high severity.
|
before the treatment and up to 12 weeks after completion of the treatment
|
|
Effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on sleep quality and its persistence in time measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: before the treatment and up to 12 weeks after completion of the treatment
|
This effect will be assessed by comparing the results of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
Each participant will fill in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index pre- post therapy and during the follow-ups.
The measure consists of 19 individual items, creating 7 components that produce one global score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores mean better sleep quality.
|
before the treatment and up to 12 weeks after completion of the treatment
|
|
Effectiveness of EMG biofeedback therapy on pain symptoms in comparison to "standard" treatment measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: after treatment and up to 12 weeks later
|
This effect will be assessed by comparing Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) between studied and control group.
The results will be compared after treatment and during follow-ups.
A numerical rating scale (NRS) requires the patient to rate their pain on a scale 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable
|
after treatment and up to 12 weeks later
|
|
Effectiveness of EMG biofeedback therapy on pain symptoms in comparison to "standard" treatment measured by pressure pain threshold
Time Frame: after treatment and up to 12 weeks later
|
This effect will be assessed by comparing pressure pain threshold measured with dolorimeter between studied and control group.
The results will be compared after treatment and during follow-ups.
|
after treatment and up to 12 weeks later
|
|
Persistence in time of EMG biofeedback therapy effects on pain symptoms measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: after treatment and up to 12 weeks later
|
This effect will be assessed by comparing Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pre- and post- biofeedback therapy.
A numerical rating scale (NRS) requires the patient to rate their pain on a scale 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable
|
after treatment and up to 12 weeks later
|
|
Persistence in time of EMG biofeedback therapy effects on pain symptoms measured by pressure pain threshold
Time Frame: after treatment and up to 12 weeks later
|
This effect will be assessed by comparing pressure pain threshold pre- and post- biofeedback therapy.
Pressure pain threshold will be measured with dolorimeter.
|
after treatment and up to 12 weeks later
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Mieszko Więckiewicz, D.M.D.Ph.D., Wroclaw Medical University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Nervous System Diseases
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Joint Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Muscular Diseases
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Pain
- Stomatognathic Diseases
- Jaw Diseases
- Mandibular Diseases
- Myofascial Pain Syndromes
- Myalgia
- Disease
- Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
- Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome
- Craniomandibular Disorders
Other Study ID Numbers
- WMU2/2017
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Muscle Pain
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterAbhimanyu Garg; Prishant Mishra; Jimin RenCompletedMuscle Weakness | Muscle Cramp | Muscle Stiffness | Statin-related Muscle Pain | Muscle AchesUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institutes of Health (NIH); North Carolina Translational and Clinical...CompletedMuscle Pain | Muscle Weakness | Muscle Tone Increased | Hamstring InjuryUnited States
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandMedical University Innsbruck; University Hospital, Zürich; Cantonal Hospital... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingMuscle Weakness | Muscle Atrophy | Muscle Spasticity | Muscle Cramp | Muscle Soreness | Muscle Damage | Myopathy | Muscle InjurySwitzerland, Austria
-
University of SurreyCompletedMuscle Soreness | Muscle Strength | Muscle DamageUnited Kingdom
-
Aya Mohamed ElsheikhFaculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt is not a recognized...CompletedGroin Pain | Adductor Muscle StrainEgypt
-
McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals, a...Completed
-
Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company LimitedWithdrawnAcute Muscle Pain
-
Brent DeGeorgeThe Plastic Surgery FoundationNot yet recruitingUpper Extremity Pain | Upper Extremity Muscle Pain | Upper Extremity Bone PainUnited States
-
Frontier Biotechnologies Inc.Not yet recruitingOsteoarthritis | Muscle Pain | Swelling Muscle
-
MedtronicCompletedChronic Pain | Spasticity, MuscleBelgium, Spain, Czechia, France, Netherlands, Slovenia, Switzerland, United Kingdom
Clinical Trials on Classic treatment for myogenous TMD
-
Soaad Tolba Mohammed Tolba BadawiCompletedTreatment Adherence and Compliance | Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) | Splint Therapy | Behavioral CounselingEgypt
-
Fundació Universitària del BagesUniversitat Internacional de CatalunyaNot yet recruitingFatigue | Temporomandibular Disorder | Chewing Problem | Mastication Disorder | Orofacial PainSpain
-
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research...Completed
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
-
Hospital Mutua de TerrassaEnrolling by invitation
-
Alper PercinCompletedTemporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome | Autonomic Nervous System ImbalanceTurkey
-
Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training...CompletedAnkylosing SpondylitisTurkey
-
University of Applied Sciences of Western SwitzerlandClaire de Labrusse; Sandrine Balisson; Léa DassonvilleCompletedUrinary Incontinence | Stress Urinary IncontinenceSwitzerland
-
Universiteit AntwerpenUniversity Hospital, Antwerp; Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk onderzoek VlaanderenCompletedTinnitus, SubjectiveBelgium
-
Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico...Instituto de Salud Carlos IIICompletedPancreatic and Periampullary TumorsSpain