Evaluation of a New Hysteroscopic Grasper for Endometrial Biopsy in Post-menopausal Patients

April 16, 2020 updated by: Antonio Simone Laganà, Università degli Studi dell'Insubria

Evaluation of a New Hysteroscopic Grasper for Endometrial Biopsy in Post-menopausal Patients With Vaginal Bleeding and/or Endometrial Thickness

Hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy is usually performed through the classic spoon grasper. Recently, a new hysteroscopic grasper with knurled terminal end and cutting jaws was designed, in order to improve feasibility of the procedure, reduce its duration and the discomfort for the patients.

This study aims to compare the outcomes of the three hysteroscopic graspers for endometrial biopsy in post-menopausal patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Diagnostic hysteroscopy is currently the gold standard method to evaluate uterine cavity and tubal ostia, allowing also the visualization of vaginal walls and the cervical canal. Compared to the other available diagnostic techniques, hysteroscopy has the advantage of directly visualization the anatomical area to be investigated and allows to perform biopsy. The possibility of hysteroscopy-guided biopsy sampling is particularly important in order to get histological diagnosis. As recently suggested, the hysteroscopic biopsy of the endometrium has diagnostic accuracy of 90% for post-menopausal endometrial cancer.

Currently, most diagnostic hysteroscopies are performed in outpatient setting, without anesthesia, using modern hysteroscopes with a 1.67 mm working channel. In particular, endometrial biopsy is usually performed through the classic spoon grasper or alligator grasper. Recently, a new hysteroscopic grasper with knurled terminal end and cutting jaws was designed, in order to improve feasibility of the procedure, reduce its duration and the discomfort for the patients.

This study aims to compare the outcomes of the three hysteroscopic graspers for endometrial biopsy in post-menopausal patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Catania, Italy, 95100
        • University of Catania
      • Varese, Italy, 21100
        • University of Insubria

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physiologic menopause
  • Vaginal bleeding or endometrial thickness (>5 mm)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hormonal replacement therapies
  • Other known causes of vaginal/cervical bleeding
  • Suspected or known cancer(s)
  • Premature or iatrogenic menopause
  • Uterine cervix stenosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: New hysteroscopic grasper
Patients allocated in this group will undergo hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy through the new grasper with knurled terminal end and cutting jaws.
Hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy performed through the new grasper with knurled terminal end and cutting jaws.
Active Comparator: Classic spoon grasper
Patients allocated in this group will undergo hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy through the classic spoon grasper.
Hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy performed through the spoon grasper.
Active Comparator: Classic alligator grasper
Patients allocated in this group will undergo hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy through the classic alligator grasper.
Hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy performed through the alligator grasper.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of the hysteroscopy
Time Frame: During the hysteroscopy
Duration of the hysteroscopic procedure, expressed in minutes and seconds.
During the hysteroscopy
Pain perceived by the patient
Time Frame: During the hysteroscopy
Subjective evaluation of the pain perceived by the patient during the procedure, expressed through a 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, where 0 means "No pain" and 10 "The worst imaginable pain".
During the hysteroscopy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of attempts
Time Frame: During the hysteroscopy
Number of attempts necessary to perform the biopsy
During the hysteroscopy
Size of the specimen
Time Frame: During the hysteroscopy
Size of the specimen obtained through biopsy, expressed in mm2
During the hysteroscopy
Feasibility assessment by the operator
Time Frame: During the hysteroscopy
Subjective assessment by the operator of the feasibility of performing the biopsy, expressed through a 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, where 0 means "No feasible at all" and 10 "The most feasible event I could imagine".
During the hysteroscopy
Precision
Time Frame: During the hysteroscopy
Subjective assessment by the operator of the precision of the biopsy, expressed through a 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, where 0 means "No precise at all" and 10 "The most precise event I could imagine".
During the hysteroscopy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antonio Simone Laganà, M.D., Ph.D., Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
  • Principal Investigator: Salvatore Giovanni Vitale, M.D., Ph.D., University of Catania

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HYGREB-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-Menopausal Bleeding

Subscribe