The Open Lung Approach During One Lung Ventilation in Thoracic Surgery

February 14, 2018 updated by: Gilda Cinnella, University of Foggia

Optimal PEEP Based on the Open Lung Approach During One Lung Ventilation in Thoracic Surgery: a Physiological Study.

  • Question: Ventilatory strategy to counterbalance the effect of one lung ventilation during thoracic surgery.
  • Findings: the open lung approach improved oxygenation and lung compliance, reducing respiratory system driving pressure and transpulmonary driving pressure.
  • Meaning: patients undergoing thoracic surgery during one lung ventilation may benefit of an open lung approach strategy to avoid ventilator lung injury.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: During thoracic surgery in lateral decubitus, one lung ventilation (OLV) may impair respiratory mechanics and gas exchange. The investigators tested a strategy based on an open lung approach (OLA) consisting in lung recruitment immediately followed by a decremental positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration to the best respiratory system compliance (CRS) and separately quantified the elastic properties of the lung and the chest wall. The investigators hypothesis was that this approach would improve gas exchange and increase lung compliance (CL).

Methods: In thirteen patients undergoing upper left lobectomy the investigators studied lung and chest wall mechanics, transpulmonary pressure (PL), respiratory system and transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔPRS and ΔPL), gas exchange and hemodynamics at two time-points (a) during OLV at zero end-expiratory pressure (OLVpre-OLA) and (b) after the application of the open-lung strategy (OLVpost-OLA).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 18 years,
  • surgery and OLV lasting ≥ 60 min

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lung reduction surgery, pneumonectomy, patients with severe COPD with preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio, expressed as a percentage (FEV1/FVC%) <60%, presence of large bullae, pleural diseases and/or acute or chronic uncompensated cardiac disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Open lung approach
Recruitment maneuver during OLV in thoracic surgery
the ventilator was switched to pressure-control ventilation with a driving pressure of 20 cmH2O. After a 3 min equilibration, PEEP was applied in steps of 5,10,15 and 20 cmH2O every five respiratory breaths; subsequently, after setting a driving pressure of 15 cmH2O, PEEP was stepwise reduced, starting from 15 cmH2O, by 2 cmH2O every 2 minutes. The recruiting pressure of 20/20 was applied for six breaths. During the decremental PEEP trial, CRS was measured at every step. The PEEP level corresponding to highest CRS during the decremental trial was identified as the "best PEEP". Subsequently, the lungs were recruited again and the "best" PEEP was applied.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in respiratory mechanics before and after the open lung approach
Time Frame: During surgery
Respiratory mechanics parameters were recorded, digitized and collected on a personal computer through a 12-bit analog-to digital converter board (DAQCard 700; National Instrument, Austin, TX) at a sample rate of 200 Hz (ICU Lab, KleisTEK Engineering, Bari, Italy).
During surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Università di Foggia

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypoxemia

Clinical Trials on Recruitment maneuver

Subscribe