Peer Support in Diabetes Management - Insulin Peer Support

May 20, 2019 updated by: Weiping Jia, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital
This project will develop a combined model of the Shanghai Integration Model and peer support for diabetes self-management with a special focus on appropriate insulin use.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The development of contemporary diabetes care offers new hope for long and satisfying lives of those with the disease, but also provides increased challenges for integration across the many dimensions of care (varied medications in addition to insulin, specialty services, diet, physical activity, stress management, etc.) and across the many who contribute to care (specialists, primary care providers, nurses, dietitians and patient educators, family members, friends, worksites). The Shanghai Integration Model (SIM) has made great strides to integrating specialty/hospital care with primary/community care. The addition of peer support can enhance patient engagement within that integrated care. Peer support can also integrate care with the daily behaviors and patterns that optimal diabetes management requires and with the family members and others in individuals' daily lives who can support diabetes management.

The "Insulin Peer Support" project is a sub-project of "Peer Support in Diabetes Care", with special focus on appropriate insulin use in the community, to help overcome barriers in insulin treatment and improve treatment compliance. This project will develop a peer support model for diabetes management in Chinese patients undergoing insulin treatment and evaluate its effectiveness in a randomized controlled trial of 10 CHCs in Shanghai.

The project is a collaboration among the Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, the Shanghai Diabetes Institute,the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning, the Shanghai Centers for Disease Control, and, at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Peers for Progress, widely recognized for its leadership in promoting peer support in health care and prevention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

360

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200235
        • Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • An Ting Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Cao He Jing Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Cao Yang Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Hong Mei Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Kang Jian Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Long Hua Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Nan Jing Xi Road Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Tao Pu Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Tian Lin Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Zhen Ru Community Health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chinese
  • Has type 2 diabetes
  • Receiving treatment at participating community health center
  • Currently using insulin or prescribed insulin but not currently using insulin

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe mental illness (severe depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, panic disorder, PTSD, borderline personality disorder, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Usual care
Experimental: Peer Support Intervention
The experimental group will receive the peer support intervention for 12 months.
The intervention involves monthly education/support groups co-led by a CHC doctor / nurse and peer coaches. These meetings will begin with a general discussion about participants' previous month, what they had been doing, any special events etc. Meetings will devote time to identifying goals and specific plans for reaching them, rehearsal and/or discussion of specific behaviors to execute plans and ways in which the group members can be helpful to each other. This will be organized around a Diabetes Action Plan. Peer coaches will provide education and support for insulin therapy to help reduce barriers around insulin use. Peer coaches will also organize activities to promote healthy lifestyles, such as walking groups, to promote informal contacts among peer supporters and participants.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline HbA1c at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
HbA1c (%)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Hemoglobin at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Hemoglobin (g/L)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Red Blood Cell Count at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Red blood cell count (10^12/L)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Mean Corpuscular Volume at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Mean Corpuscular Volume (fL)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (pg)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Liver Functioning at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
ALT (U/L), AST (U/L), Alkaline phosphatase (U/L), r-GT (U/L)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Bilirubin at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Total bilirubin (µmol/L), Direct bilirubin (µmol/L)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Blood Urea at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Blood urea (mmol/L)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Serum Creatinine at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Serum creatinine (µmol/L)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Uric Acid at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Uric acid (µmol/L)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Albumin (mg/L), Creatinine (mmol/L)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Fasting Blood Glucose at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
FPG (mmol/L)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Blood Pressure at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
SBP and DBP (mmHg)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline BMI at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Height (cm) and weight (kg)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Blood Lipids at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL (mmol/L)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in Insulin Functioning at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months
Insulin (pmol/L)
6 months, 12 months
Change in C-peptides at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months
C-peptide (nmol/L)
6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Diabetes Self Care Behaviors at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
9 items from Summary of Diabetes Self Care Activities and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Items 1-7 measure diabetes self care activities during the previous 7 days. Items 1, 2, 4-7 are assessed on a scale of 0 to 7 days. Item 3 is assessed on scale of 1-4, where 1 represents very low levels of daily activity and 4 represents very high levels of daily activity. Items 8 and 9 are yes/no questions that measure cigarette intake over the past 7 and 30 days.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Medication Adherence at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Morisky 4-item adherence scale. Four yes/no questions about medication adherence in which yes responses are less favorable. Yes responses are coded as 0, No responses are coded as 1, and scores are summed. A total score of 0 is the lowest level of medication adherence and 4 is the highest level of medication adherence.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline General Quality of Life at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
6-item EQ-5D, a standardized instrument for measuring generic health status. The respondents are asked to choose one of the statements which best describes their health status on the surveyed day. Rated level can be coded as a number 1, 2, or 3, which indicates having no problems for 1, having some problems for 2, and having extreme problems for 3. As a result, a person's health status can be defined by a 5-digit number, ranging from 11111 (having no problems in all dimensions) to 33333 (having extreme problems in all dimensions). Item 6 is the visual analogue scale, in which respondents are asked to mark their health status on the day of the interview on a 20 cm vertical scale with end points of 0 and 100, where 0 corresponds to "the worst health you can imagine", and 100 corresponds to "the best health you can imagine"
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Diabetes Quality of Life at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
4-item Diabetes Distress Scale, an abbreviated version of the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale. The respondents are asked to respond to which degree each of the items has bothered them in the past month on a 6-point scale (1-6), where 1 is not a brother and 6 is very bothersome. Scores are summed and divided by 4 to calculate the mean. Mean scores of 3 or higher (moderate distress) are considered worthy of clinical attention.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Depression at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), the PHQ-9 minus the last question on suicidal thoughts. The PHQ is a standard instrument used in primary care settings to screen for the presence and severity of depression. The respondents are asked how often they have been bothered by each of the 8 items in the past 2 weeks on a 4 point scale (0-3), where 0 is "not all" and 3 is "nearly every day". The scores for each item are summed to produce a total score between 0 and 24 points. A total score of 0 to 4 represents no significant depressive symptoms. A total score of 5 to 9 represents mild depressive symptoms; 10 to 14, moderate; 15 to 19, moderately severe; and 20 to 24, severe.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in Community Support for Diabetes at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months
Novel 9-item questionnaire that assesses the degree to which respondents receive community support (other than family) for their diabetes. Items 1-8 are scored from on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is "not at all" and 5 is "completely". Item 9 asks for the relationship of the person / people to the respondent.
6 months, 12 months
Change in Healthcare Utilization at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months
Novel 6-item questionnaire that assesses patterns of healthcare and program utilization. Item 1 asks respondents the last time they saw a community health center doctor or nurse for their diabetes. Possible responses are "Within the last 2 weeks", "Within the last month", "Within the last 2 months", "Between 2-4 months ago", and "More than 4 months ago". Items 2-6 ask respondents to recall how many times they accessed healthcare services (peer support, primary care, outpatient hospital care, overnight hospital stays) in the past 3 months. Possible responses are "0", "1-2", "3-5", and "5+".
6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline Insulin Attitudes at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
13-item Chinese Attitudes to Starting Insulin Questionnaire (Ch-ASIQ). Four subscales consisting of 'Self-image and stigmatization' (3 items); 'Factors promoting self-efficacy (5 items); 'Fear of pain or needles' (3 items); and 'Time and family support' (2 items). Responses are scored using a 4-point Likert scale (Totally disagree = 1, Totally Agree = 4). Individual scale scores are calculated by summing the item responses. For the subscales 'Factors promoting self-efficacy' and 'Time and family support', higher scores indicate more positive attitudes towards the use of insulin. For the subscales 'Self-image and stigmatization' and 'Fear of pain or needles' a higher score indicates a more negative attitude towards insulin initiation. The weighted sum of all four scale scores, converting two positively coded scales to negatively coded scales, calculates the overall score with higher scores indicating more negative attitude to starting insulin.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Weiping Jia, MD, PhD, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Edwin B Fisher, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 8, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Insulin

Clinical Trials on Peer Support

Subscribe