Peer Support To Enhance The Shanghai Integration Model Of Diabetes Care: Extension & Dissemination

January 23, 2023 updated by: Weiping Jia, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital

This project developed a combined model of the Shanghai Integration Model and peer support for diabetes self-management education and support. The program was implemented and evaluated in nine Community Health Centers in Shanghai, China.

Note: This registration reflects modifications to a study that was registered in 2018.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The development of contemporary diabetes care offers new hope for long and satisfying lives of those with the disease, but also provides increased challenges for integration across the many dimensions of care (varied medications in addition to insulin, specialty services, diet, physical activity, stress management, etc.) and across the many who contribute to care (specialists, primary care providers, nurses, dietitians and patient educators, family members, friends, worksites). The Shanghai Integration Model (SIM) has made great strides to integrating specialty/hospital care with primary/community care. The addition of peer support can enhance patient engagement within that integrated care. Peer support can also integrate care with the daily behaviors and patterns that optimal diabetes management requires and with the family members and others in individuals' daily lives who can support diabetes management.

This project developed a combined model of the Shanghai Integration Model and peer support for diabetes self-management education and support. The program was implemented and evaluated in nine Community Health Centers (CHCs) in Shanghai, China. The program is a collaboration among the Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, the Shanghai Diabetes Institute, the Shanghai Health Bureau, the Shanghai Centers for Disease Control, and, at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Peers for Progress, widely recognized for its leadership in promoting peer support in health care and prevention.

A planned, stepped wedge design to stagger introduction of the program over subsets of CHCs proved impractical within the realities of those sites. Therefore, the original study protocol was modified in the following ways:

  • Instead of staggering program implementation among 3 cohorts of CHCs, all participating CHCs implemented the program concurrently in a single-arm design.
  • A greater number of participants were enrolled than anticipated.
  • To reduce risk of Type 1 error, the number of secondary endpoints was reduced to those central to diabetes management - glycemia, blood pressure, and lipids, and, in the area of psychosocial factors, depression, diabetes distress, and general quality of life.
  • The original plan called for outcome measures to be collected at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months according to the stepped wedge study design. Since the CHCs implemented the program in one cohort, the outcome measures were collected at baseline, 12 months, and 18 months in order to assess the long term benefits given the chronic, progressive nature of diabetes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1284

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200233
        • Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • An Ting Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Cao Yang Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Hong Mei Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Kang Jian Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Long Hua Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Nan Jing Xi Road Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Tao Pu Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Tian Lin Community Health Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Zhen Ru Community Health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chinese
  • Has type 2 diabetes
  • Receiving treatment at participating community health center

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe mental illness (severe depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, panic disorder, PTSD, borderline personality disorder, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Peer Support Intervention
9 CHCs will receive the peer support intervention for the full duration of the study period (12 months). Baseline assessment, 12-month and 18-month evaluation to assess the effectiveness and sustainability of the intervention.
The intervention involves monthly education/support groups co-led by a CHC doctor / nurse and peer leaders. These meetings will begin with a general discussion about participants' previous month, what they had been doing, any special events etc. Meetings will devote time to identifying goals and specific plans for reaching them, rehearsal and/or discussion of specific behaviors to execute plans and ways in which the group members can be helpful to each other. This will be organized around a Diabetes Action Plan. Peer leaders will also organize activities to promote healthy lifestyles, such as walking groups, to promote informal contacts among peer leaders and participants.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline HbA1c at 12 and 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months, 18 months
HbA1c (%)
Baseline, 12 months, 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Blood Pressure at 12 and 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months, 18 months
SBP and DBP (mmHg)
Baseline, 12 months, 18 months
Change from Baseline Blood Lipids at 12 and 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months, 18 months
LDL (mmol/L)
Baseline, 12 months, 18 months
Change from Baseline General Quality of Life at 12 and 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months, 18 months
5-item measure of quality of life adapted from the EQ-5D, a standardized instrument for measuring generic health status. The respondents are asked to choose one of the statements which best describes their health status on the surveyed day. Rated level can be coded as a number 1, 2, or 3, which indicates having no problems for 1, having some problems for 2, and having extreme problems for 3. As a result, a person's health status can be defined by a 5-digit number, ranging from 11111 (having no problems in all dimensions) to 33333 (having extreme problems in all dimensions). A sixth item, the visual analogue scale, was not included.
Baseline, 12 months, 18 months
Change from Baseline Diabetes Distress at 12 and 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months, 18 months
4-item measure of diabetes distress adapted from the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale. The respondents are asked to respond to which degree each of the items has bothered them in the past month on a 6-point scale (1-6), where 1 is not a brother and 6 is very bothersome. Scores are summed and divided by 4 to calculate the mean.
Baseline, 12 months, 18 months
Change from Baseline Depression at 12 and 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months, 18 months
8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), the PHQ-9 minus the last question on suicidal thoughts. The PHQ is a standard instrument used in primary care settings to screen for the presence and severity of depression. The respondents are asked how often they have been bothered by each of the 8 items in the past 2 weeks on a 4 point scale (0-3), where 0 is "not all" and 3 is "nearly every day". The scores for each item are summed to produce a total score between 0 and 24 points. A total score of 0 to 4 represents no significant depressive symptoms. A total score of 5 to 9 represents mild depressive symptoms; 10 to 14, moderate; 15 to 19, moderately severe; and 20 to 24, severe.
Baseline, 12 months, 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Weiping Jia, MD, PhD, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Edwin B Fisher, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 8, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 11, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 11, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Peer Support

3
Subscribe