Predictors Factors and Time of Onset of Spasticity and Their Relationship With the Functionality and Quality of Life.

November 2, 2020 updated by: ARLETTE PATRICIA DOUSSOULIN SANHUEZA, Universidad de La Frontera

Predictive Factors and Time of Onset of Spasticity in Post-stroke Patients and Their Relationship With the Functionality and Quality of Life.

Spasticity is part of the syndrome motor neuron following a Stroke. It is a clinical sign of great complexity that generates disability, limiting the function and altering the quality of life of the subjects, generating great impact on families and society.

Identify times and characteristics of appearance; as well as its predictive factors can support an early intervention, orienting and strengthening the work of the rehabilitation team.

Determine the times of establishment, location and factors that favor the development of spasticity in acute stage and how it influences the functionality, quality of life and emotional level of post-stroke patients in hospital facilities.

Through this proposal, it is proposed to generate a new line of research that allows the development of scientific evidence in the area of neurorehabilitation, specifically in the field of spasticity, through the identification of establishment times, affected structures and predominant patterns in the extremities; as well as determining factors that favor the development of spasticity and its impact on post-stroke functionality and quality of life.

This information will strengthen the rehabilitative process of these subjects and the actions of the rehabilitation team, supporting the identification of preventive measures and implementing effective interventions that allow achieving better motor and functional results, in search of an optimal recovery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A correlational (non-experimental), longitudinal, prospective follow-up design will be used for descriptive and predictive purposes.

The sample will consist of 150 subjects who meet the inclusion criteria, sign the informed consent and who will be treated during the year 2018 at the Hospital and the Clinic.

The study will include three measurement times: Time 1, during the first 10 days of hospitalization (T1); Time 2, at 3 months after T1; and Time 3, at 12 months after T1.

At each time of measurement, the study variables will be evaluated by 4 professionals trained in the following instruments: the Ashworth Scale to assess spasticity; To measure global functionality, the Barthel Index will be applied and, to assess functionality of the upper extremity, the Action Research Arm scale will be used; The Quality of Life Scale for Stroke-38 will be used to assess quality of life and emotional level. In addition, in time 1 the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the sample will be evaluated through a clinical record prepared for this purpose.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Temuco, Chile, 4780000
        • Universidad de La Frontera

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

It will be constituted by all the subjects with a medical diagnosis of stroke in the acute phase, attended during 2018 at the Dr. Hernán Henríquez Aravena Hospital and the Alemana Clinic.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have an age between 20 and 80 years, with no previous history of motor disability.
  • Being hospitalized with a diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke in the acute period.
  • Present a history with a single stroke event confirmed by Computerized Axial Tomography.
  • Without severe cognitive commitment, that is, score greater than 14 on the MiniMental Abbreviated scale.
  • Stable hemodynamically.
  • Voluntarily accept participation in the study through the signing of informed consent, either personally or through a family member.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Present sensitive aphasia.
  • Have a medical contraindication.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Institution-Group 8 district
Group of patients belonging to institutions of district 8. Patients will be evaluated in 3 different times with different assessment instruments for tone, functionality and quality of life.

The study includes three measurement times:

  • Time 1 (T1): corresponds to the first measurement, which will take place between the 3rd and 10th day of hospitalization.
  • Time 2 (T2): corresponds to the second measurement, which will be carried out 3 months after the first measurement.
  • Time 3 (T3): corresponds to the third measurement, which will be carried out 12 months after the first measurement.

The evaluations will be tone, functionality and quality of life.

Institution-Group 9 district
Group of patients belonging to institutions of district 9. Patients will be evaluated in 3 different times with different assessment instruments for tone, functionality and quality of life.

The study includes three measurement times:

  • Time 1 (T1): corresponds to the first measurement, which will take place between the 3rd and 10th day of hospitalization.
  • Time 2 (T2): corresponds to the second measurement, which will be carried out 3 months after the first measurement.
  • Time 3 (T3): corresponds to the third measurement, which will be carried out 12 months after the first measurement.

The evaluations will be tone, functionality and quality of life.

Institution-Group 10 district
Group of patients belonging to institutions of district 10. Patients will be evaluated in 3 different times with different assessment instruments for tone, functionality and quality of life.

The study includes three measurement times:

  • Time 1 (T1): corresponds to the first measurement, which will take place between the 3rd and 10th day of hospitalization.
  • Time 2 (T2): corresponds to the second measurement, which will be carried out 3 months after the first measurement.
  • Time 3 (T3): corresponds to the third measurement, which will be carried out 12 months after the first measurement.

The evaluations will be tone, functionality and quality of life.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
Instrument used in the assessment of spasticity. Graduates the tone from 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (rigid extremity in flexion or extension), it is based on the examiner manually moving a limb of the patient, in the whole of the possible joint range (in the clinical setting it is use 1 second to perform the complete joint travel) and perceive the resistance that a muscle offers when stretched.
6 months
Action Research Arm
Time Frame: 6 months
This Instrument was constructed to determine the functional recovery of the upper limb. It is composed of 19 items grouped in 4 subtest, including each subtest: 6 items of grip, 4 items taken, 6 items of clip, 3 items of thick movement. All the items are evaluated with a scale of 4 points from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no movement and 3 normal movement for the task.
6 months
Barthel Index
Time Frame: 6 months

Scale that assesses the level of patient independence with respect to performing Activity Daily Life. The values assigned to each activity depend on the time spent and help to carry it out.

The activities are valued differently, being able to assign 0, 5, 10 or 15 points. The global range can vary between 0, completely dependent, and 100 points, completely independent.

6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 30, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

We have not decided this item.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Stroke Spasticity

Clinical Trials on Institution-Group

Subscribe