Evaluation of the Active Warming Effects on Maternal and Neonatal Outcome During Cesarean Delivery

September 11, 2020 updated by: Cotoia Antonella, University of Foggia

Evaluation of the Active Warming Effects on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes During Cesarean Delivery

A prospective randomized study of healthy term parturients undergoing cesarean delivery was designed to assess the impact of the active warming on perioperative and postoperative temperature.

The main objective is to evaluate the maternal core temperature in the perioperative and postoperative period during cesarean delivery.

The secondary objectives are to assess the incidence of maternal hypothermia, the incidence of maternal shivers, the evaluation of maternal thermal comfort, the neonatal temperature at birth, the Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes, the umbilical pH, the evaluation of coagulative assessment in case of maternal hypothermia trough the use of thromboelastography.

The patients are randomized into three groups: a group of no warmed patients, a second group of Active waming patients with iv fluids and lower body forced air warming and a third group of Active warming patients with only warmed iv fluids.

The inclusion criteria are healthy parturients up to age 18. The exclusion criteria included parturients who develop fever, diabetes mellitus, BMI up to 40kg/ m2, coagulative disorders, pre eclampsia or eclampsia, all the factors that can cause intraoperative bleeding such as placental abruption or antecedent placenta overgrowth ( placenta previa).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The doctor's main purposes during the perioperative period are the monitorign and maintenance of normothermia, as well as the haemodynamic, respiratory, metabolic, analgesic control and monitoring.

Mild hypothermia ( core temperature between 36° and 33° C) is common during general, locoregional or blended anaesthesia. A mild hypothermia can cause a cardiovascular, haematological, metaolic and hormonal alterations that can explain an increased mortality and morbidity in hypothermia patients versus normothermia patients.

Thermic decrease is a physiological event during general or locoregional anaesthesia. Particularly spinal and epidural anaesthesia can cause the thermic decrease because of vasodilation below the level of the sensitive and neuroaxial blockade. In this way there is in the patient an increased heat loss trough radiation. The neuroaxial techniques can reduce the sensory connections and the level of vasoconstriction above the level of the sensorial blockade, reducing the patient capacity to maintain the poichilothermia.

The consequences of hypothermia are important because they can influence the intraoperative management causing complications extending the recovering time and the hospitalization.

The environmental temperature is a critical factor for the development of hypothermia , especially in critically patients. In order to avoid the deveopment of hypothermia the environmental temperature must be maintainde between 21° and 24° C and humidity level of 40- 60%.

Maternal hypothermia is common during cesarean delivery and it can exercise influence over neonatal temperature.

When a mother develops hypothermia the newborn can shows hypotheria, umbilical acidosis, low Apgar score at birth.

The recorded data are the demographic data of the patient such as weight, age and height, the vital signs such as heart rate, arterial pressure, SpO2 or EtCO2 during general anaesthesia, BMI, gestational age and parity, type of anaesthesia, doses and type of anaesthetic used, the development of adverse effects such as hypothermia or hypothension, the blood leaks, the environmental temperature on operative theatre, the temperature of fluids iv in the perioperative period, the maternal core temperature at preoperative, during induction of anaesthesia, after 5 minutes initiating anaesthesia, and then every 10 minutes until the end of the cesarean delivery and also at child birth, at the exit of operative theatre. Maternal temperature measurment will be obtained by using a skin sensor Spot On on a temporal region, the neonatal axillary temperature at 1 and5 minutes from birth using a digital thermometer, Apgar score and umbilical cord blood pH, the pain evaluation using a VAS scale ( 0-10), the maternal shivering by the Bedside Shivering Assessment scale, the maternal comfort using a verbal numerical scale ( 0 = as worst immaginable cold 50= as thermoneutral and 100= as insufferably hot), the timing of pain at induction of anaesthesia and then every 10 minutes until the operative room exit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

165

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Puglia
      • Foggia, Puglia, Italy, 71100
        • Recruiting
        • Ospedali Riuniti
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Claudia Ferialdi, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Antonella Matera, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria: all healthy parturients over eighteen years undergoing cesarean delivery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fever;
  • Diabetes mellitus;
  • BMI> 40Kg/m²;
  • Coaugulation disorders;
  • Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia;
  • Increased risk of intraoperative hemorrhage

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: not warmed
Not warming system
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: warmed group 1
forced air warming and warmed intravenous fluids
Use of warming system (forced air)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: warmed group 2
warmed intravenous fluids
Use of warming system to have warmed intravenous fluids

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
incidence of hypothermia (body temperature < 36°C)
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the end of surgery, up to four hours of surgery
to assess the incidence of maternal hypothermia during caesarean delivery
From the date of randomization until the end of surgery, up to four hours of surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of maternal shivering
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the end of surgery, up to four hours of surgery
Use of the Bedside shivering scale (score 0 no shiver, score 1 mild shiver at the neck or thorax, score 2 moderate shiver at the neck, thorax and arms, score 3 severe shiver at the neck, thorax, arms and legs. Score 2 and 3 are the worse outcomes
From the date of randomization until the end of surgery, up to four hours of surgery
Neonatal body temperature (T°C)
Time Frame: From neonatal birth until five minutes after the birth
with axillary thermometer
From neonatal birth until five minutes after the birth
Neonatal Apgar score
Time Frame: From neonatal birth and until five minutes after the birth
Measurement of Apgar score
From neonatal birth and until five minutes after the birth
Incidence of maternal coagulative disorders
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the end of surgery, up to four hours of surgery
Thromboelastography
From the date of randomization until the end of surgery, up to four hours of surgery
maternal thermal comfort
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the end of surgery, up to four hours of surgery
Use of a VAS 0-100 scale (100=insufferably hot, 50=thermoneutral and 0=unimaginably cold); 50 thermoneutral is the better outcome cold, 0=thermally neutral, +50=insufferably hot
From the date of randomization until the end of surgery, up to four hours of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antonella Cotoia, MD, University of Foggia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 22, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 76/CE/2017

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypothermia; Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on forced air warming and warmed intravenous fluids

Subscribe