Antiviral Cellular Therapy for Enhancing T-cell Reconstitution Before or After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (ACES)

May 6, 2025 updated by: Michael Pulsipher, Pediatric Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Consortium

Antiviral Cellular Therapy for Enhancing T-cell Reconstitution Before or After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (ACES) PBMTC SUP1701

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether virus-specific T cell lines (VSTs) are safe and can effectively control three viruses (EBV, CMV, and adenovirus) in patients who have had a stem cell transplant and also in patients that have a primary immunodeficiency disorder with no prior stem cell transplant.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary purpose of the study is to evaluate whether most closely HLA-matched multivirus-specific T cell lines obtained from a bank of allogeneic virus-specific T cell lines (VSTs) have antiviral activity against three viruses: EBV, CMV and adenovirus.

Reconstitution of anti-viral immunity by donor-derived VSTs has shown promise in preventing and treating infections associated with CMV, EBV and adenovirus post-transplant. However, the time required to prepare patient-specific products and lack of virus-specific memory T cells in cord blood and seronegative donors, limits their value. An alternative is to use banked partially HLA-matched allogeneic VSTs. A prior phase II study at Baylor College of Medicine using trivirus-specific VSTs generated using monocytes and EBV-transformed B cells gene-modified with a clinical grade adenoviral vector expressing CMV-pp65 to activate and expand specific T cells showed the feasibility, safety and activity of this approach for the treatment of refractory CMV, EBV and Adenovirus infections. More recent protocols utilizing synthetic viral peptide pools allow ex vivo expansion of T-cells targeting multiple viral antigens in 10-12 days without use of viral transduction.

The study will evaluate whether partially-HLA matched allogeneic multivirus-specific VSTs, activated using overlapping peptide libraries spanning immunogenic antigens from CMV, adenovirus and EBV, will be safe and produce anti-viral effects in immunodeficient recipients infected with one of more of the targeted viruses that are persistent despite conventional anti-viral therapy.

This study will evaluate safety and efficacy of partially-matched VST therapy in A) patients who have persistent viral infections in the post-HSCT period, and B) patients with primary immunodeficiency conditions who have persistent viral infections and have not undergone HSCT.

The study agent will be assessed for safety and antiviral activity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85016
        • Phoenix Children's Hospital
    • California
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010
        • City of Hope
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • University of California, Los Angeles
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 91016
        • Children's Hospital Los Angeles
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Stanford Lucile Packard Children's Hospital
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94123
        • UCSF Medical Center
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Children's Hospital Colorado
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
        • Yale
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, DC, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Children's National Medical Center
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University/Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Riley Hospital for Children - Indiana University
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Tufts Medical Center
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/ Boston Children's Hospital
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49503
        • Spectrum Health - Helen DeVos Children's Hospital
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
        • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health & Science University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • The Children's Hospital
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38105
        • St. Jude
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • UT southwestern Medical Center
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Methodist Healthcare System of San Antonio
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Children's Mercy
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
        • Virginia Commonwealth University
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109
        • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Chlindren's/University of Washington School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

Patients who have received any type of allogeneic transplant or who have a primary immunodeficiency disorder will be eligible if they have CMV, adenovirus, and/or EBV infection/disease with failure of treatment after 7 days of standard therapy OR if unable to tolerate standard therapy.

  • Patients must meet one of the following criteria:

    • Recipient of prior myeloablative or non-myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant using either bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell or single or double cord blood within the previous 18 months, OR
    • Have a diagnosed primary immunodeficiency disorder (as defined by clinical and laboratory evaluations) and not undergone HSCT.
  • Treatment of the following persistent or relapsed infections despite standard therapy:

    • CMV: Treatment of persistent or relapsed CMV disease or infection after standard therapy. For CMV infection, standard therapy is defined as antiviral therapy with ganciclovir, foscarnet or cidofovir for at least 14 days.
    • Adenovirus: Treatment of persistent or relapsed adenovirus infection or disease despite standard therapy. Standard therapy is defined as antiviral therapy with cidofovir or brincidofovir.
    • EBV: Treatment of persistent or relapsed EBV infection despite standard therapy.

For EBV infection, standard therapy is defined as rituximab given at 375 mg/m2 in patients for 1-4 doses with a CD20+ tumor.

Additional Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with simultaneous infections with CMV, EBV and/or Adenovirus infections are eligible if one or more infection(s) is persistent or relapsed despite standard therapy as defined above. Patients with multiple infections with one or more reactivation and one or more controlled infection are eligible to enroll.
  • Clinical status at enrollment that allows tapering of steroids to equal or less than 0.5 mg/kg/day prednisone (or equivalent) prior to infusion of the VST doses.
  • Negative pregnancy test in female patients if applicable (childbearing potential who have received a reduced intensity conditioning regimen).
  • Written informed consent and/or signed assent line from patient, parent or guardian.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients receiving ATG, Campath, Basiliximab or other immunosuppressive monoclonal antibodies targeting T-cells within 28 days of screening for enrollment.
  • Patients who have received donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) or other experimental cellular therapies within 28 days.
  • Current therapy with ruxolitinib or other JAK inhibitors within the previous 3 days.
  • Patients with other uncontrolled infections, defined as bacterial or fungal infections with clinical signs of worsening despite standard therapy. For bacterial infections, patients must be receiving definitive therapy and have no signs of progressing infection for 72 hours prior to enrollment. For fungal infections, patients must be receiving definitive systemic anti-fungal therapy and have no signs of progressing infection for 1 week prior to enrollment.
  • Progressing infection is defined as hemodynamic instability, worsening physical signs, or radiographic findings attributable to infection. Persisting fever without other signs or symptoms will not be interpreted as progressing infection.
  • Patients with active and uncontrolled relapse of malignancy (if applicable).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Virus specific T cell lines (VSTs) against three viruses
The study will evaluate whether partially-HLA matched allogeneic multivirus-specific VSTs, activated using overlapping peptide libraries spanning immunogenic antigens from CMV, adenovirus and EBV, will be safe and produce anti-viral effects in immunodeficient recipients infected with one of more of the targeted viruses that are persistent despite conventional anti-viral therapy.
Patients will receive partially HLA-matched VSTs as a single infusion. Patients who have a partial response (>1 log decrease in viral load without clearance) or no response and do not have treatment-related dose-limiting toxicities are eligible to receive up to 3 additional doses from day 30 after the initial infusion and at 2 weekly intervals thereafter. The viral load of the virus (or viruses) that patients are initially treated for are monitored by viral PCR.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility to identify suitable HLA matched VST products
Time Frame: 30 days
Feasibility will be defined as the ability of the investigators to identify suitable partially HLA- matched VST products from the VST bank at Children's National Medical Center for referred study subjects. The percentage of referred patients with potential partially-matched VST products identified will be recorded, as will timing between patient referral and treatment.
30 days
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Time Frame: 30 days
The safety endpoint, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), will be defined as acute GvHD grades III-IV or grades 3-5 infusion-related adverse events or grades 4-5 non-hematological adverse events related to the T cell product within 30 days of each VST dose and that are not due to the pre-existing infection or the original malignancy or pre-existing co-morbidities as defined by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03.
30 days
Efficacy of VST at 30 days as measured by viral load
Time Frame: 30 days
Peripheral blood and, where relevant, stool and urine will be monitored for CMV, EBV, and/or adenovirus viral load. For patients with multiple viral infections, the response against the primary viral target will determine the classification. For the infection under treatment response in viral load will be assessed at 30 days after the first VST infusion
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Persistence of infused VSTs
Time Frame: 1 month and 3 months
Persistence of infused T cells will be monitored at 1 month and 3 months following VST infusion using deep sequencing and additional tests as indicated to track the TCR v-beta repertoire in the patient peripheral blood prior to and post-infusion.
1 month and 3 months
Effects on Clinical Signs of Viral Infection
Time Frame: 3 months
If a patient has organ involvement, clinical response will be monitored. For patients with EBV lymphoma and measurable disease, response will be assessed by RECIST criteria.
3 months
Survival
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months
Overall survival at 6 and 12 months post VST infusion will be computed.
6 months and 12 months
Reconstitution of Antiviral Immunity following VST infusions
Time Frame: 3 months

Patient serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells will be monitored for virus-specific activity during the 3 months following VST infusion by the following measures:

  1. T cell phenotyping by flow cytometry (including % CD3, CD4, CD8, TCRalpha/beta and CD45RA-/CCR7+, among other markers)
  2. Antiviral T cell responses to CMV, EBV, and/or Adenovirus antigens by IGN-g ELIspot (spot forming units) and Intracellular cytokine staining ( %IFN-gamma and TFNa+ of CD4 and CD8 cells)
  3. T cell repertoire and antiviral specificity by TCR sequencing (%clonotype frequencies)
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Michael Keller, MD, Children's National Research Institute
  • Study Chair: Michael Pulsipher, MD, Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cytomegalovirus Infections

Clinical Trials on Virus Specific T-cell (VST) infusion

Subscribe