MINI Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Bypass: Differences in HOrmonal Secretions at 2 Years of Surgery (MINIBHO)

September 20, 2019 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Endocrine and Absorptive Intestinal Function in Patients at Two Years of Bariatric Surgery: Omega Loop Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Gastric bypass with omega loop technic (OLGB) seems to be as effective as gastric bypass roux-en-Y (RYGB the reference) for the management of obesity and type 2 diabetes, but with less early surgical complications and more undernutrition in long terms.

This study aims to explore the profile of secretion of entero-insular hormone after a meal test in OLGB patient vs RYGB to understand the mechanisms of the improvement of type 2 diabetes after OLGB.

Secondary objectives are to better understand the absorptive function of the gut after a gastric bypass, to understand why is there more undernutrition in long term after OLGB than after RYGB.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

In the treatment of obesity associated with type 2 diabetes, there is still few informations comparing the gastric bypass roux-en-Y (RYGB), the reference method, and the bypass in Omega (OLGB). The effectiveness of both interventions is comparable regarding weight loss and the management of type 2 diabetes but the level of proof remains low. Nutritional deficiencies and chronic diarrhea are reported in both interventions. It seems that the OLGB would cause more malabsorption and undernutrition but the OLGB would lead to less early operative complications because it has only one gastro-jejunal anastomosis compared to RYGB which has two.

The success of the RYGB for the remission of diabetes, is partly associated with a change in secretion's profile of intestinal hormones participating in the glucose homeostasis, especially the GLP-1. There is no studies published reporting the level of secretion (fasting or postprandial) of gastrointestinal hormones after OLGB. It is important to understand how this surgery produces its effects, especially on diabetes.

MINIBHO main hypothesis is that the secretion's profile of entero-insular hormones, like GLP-1, are exacerbated after OLGB just like in RYGB, that would explain the same level of improvement of T2 diabetes after both surgery.

Kinetic study of entero-insular secretion will be assessed by some blood dosages of entero-insular hormones (GLP-1, GLP-2, Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), glicentine, Insulin, peptide C, Glucagon and glucose) in 30 patients (15 OLGB and 15 RYGB). These dosages will be made at different times after a meal test (during fasting, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes and 120 minutes after the meal) to search a significant difference in the profile of secretion between the OLGB and RYGB patients.

Investigators also hypothesize that the editing method of the OLGB leads to a decrease in the food absorption profile compared to RYGB. To explore this hypothesis, citrulline and apolipoprotein B48 (ApoB48) levels will be measured, which reflect enterocyte function of the patients, and will be compared between patients operated with RYGB vs OLGB. Functional enterocyte mass will be correlated to the absorptive function of the gut which will be evaluated by the examination of the 24h feces.

The main objective is to determine whether the secretion profiles of entero-insular hormone during a meal are different or not in patients operated with OLGB compared to RYGB. The secondary objectives are to evaluate in these patients the absorptive function and the functional enterocyte mass.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Île-de-France
      • Paris, Île-de-France, France, 75015
        • AP-HP - hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient recruited 2 years (+/- 6 months) after Omega-loop Gastric Bypass or Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Roux en Y gastric bypass or omega loop gastric bypass at two years of the surgery (6 months more or less)
  • 18 years minimum
  • weight > 40kg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1 diabetes diagnosed with the positivity of anti Glutamate Acid Decarboxylase (GAD) or anti Ia2
  • Treatment with Insulin, Glucagon Like Peptide 1 (GLP1) or anti-DiPeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP4) during the study
  • Unbalanced type 2 diabetes : HbA1c > 8%
  • Anemia with hemoglobin < 7g/dl
  • Gut inflammatory disease ; infectious disease, cancer, iatrogenic disease, auto-immune disease
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • allergy to Carmin (E120)
  • participation to another clinical trial
  • patient under legal protection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patient: Blood sampling & Feces sampling

Blood samplings at different times after a meal test: 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes.

Feces sampling: collection during 24 hours

Quantitative analysis of enterohormones, citrulline and ApoB48
Intestinal absorption assessment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kinetic of GLP-1 secretion
Time Frame: 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal test
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve of GLP-1
0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal test

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plasmatic dosage of citrulline
Time Frame: Baseline
Plasmatic concentration of Citrulline versus enterocyte mass function
Baseline
Plasmatic dosage of Apolipoprotein B48
Time Frame: Baseline
Plasmatic concentration of Apolipoprotein B48 versus enterocyte mass function
Baseline
Lipidic Absorptive Coefficient
Time Frame: 1 day
Percentage between lipidic food intakes and lipidic excretion in feces
1 day
Protein Absorptive Coefficient
Time Frame: 1 day
Percentage between protein food intakes and protein excretion in feces
1 day
Glucidic Absorptive Coefficient
Time Frame: 1 day
Percentage between carbohydrate food intakes and carbohydrate excretion in feces
1 day
kinetic of GLP-2 secretion
Time Frame: 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal test
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve of GLP-2
0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal test
Kinetic of GIP secretion
Time Frame: 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal test
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve of GIP
0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal test
Kinetic of Peptide C secretion
Time Frame: 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal test
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve of Peptide C
0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal test
Kinetic of Insulin secretion
Time Frame: 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal test
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve of Insulin
0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal test
Kinetic of Glucagon secretion
Time Frame: 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal test
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve of Glucagon
0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal test
Kinetic of Glicentin secretion
Time Frame: 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal test
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve of Glicentin
0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal test
Kinetic of Glycemia
Time Frame: 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal test
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve of glucose
0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal test

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Claire Carette, MD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 14, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 14, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • K171007J
  • 2017-A02816-47 (Other Identifier: France: ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bariatric Surgery

Clinical Trials on Blood sampling

Subscribe