Femtosecond Laser Versus Microkeratome in Creating Corneal Flaps in LASIK

March 24, 2018 updated by: Gerges Fargalla, Assiut University

Predictability of Corneal Flap Thickness in Lasik Using Femtosecod Laser in Comparison to Moria Microkeratome

Since the cornea is the main responsible for the refraction of the eye, as its refractive power is greater than 70% of the total refraction of the eye, so modification of its refractive properties are used to change the optical system of the eye. Hence, laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis has become the most commonly procedure used to correct the refractive errors of the eye. The most important step in laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis is the creation of the corneal flap, which its thickness may judge the whole outcome of the surgery . So trying to minimize the variation in the thickness of the resultant flap in comparison to what planned flap thickness preoperatively become our target.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

As laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis procedure started to use automated microkeratomes in creating corneal flaps since 1989, and science go on until United states Food and Drug Administration approved the IntraLase laser for flap creation in January 2000 femtosecond lasers work by emitting light pulses of short duration (10-15 s) at 1053 nm wavelength that cause photodisruption of the tissue with minimum collateral damage . This enables no blade incisions to be performed within the tissue at various patterns and depth with high precision.

Aim of the work To evaluate and compare the variation in corneal flap thickness created from use of a femtosecond laser and a MORIA microkeratome when making a 110-µm- and 90- µm thick corneal flap and to identify the potential factors that affect corneal flap thickness.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

population attending specialized eye centers

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-40 year
  • Preoperative spherical refraction of -2.00 to -10.00D.
  • Refractive cylinder of less than -3.00D.
  • A stable refractive state for 2 years.
  • An intraocular pressure (IOP) of <22 mm Hg.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of any systemic autoimmune disease.
  • A history of diabetes.
  • Other ophthalmic disorders.
  • A history of ocular trauma and surgical history.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
femtosecond_laser
participants had there lasik corneal flap creation using femtosecond laser
anterior segment OCT (Ocular Coherence Tomography) a device shows imaging of anterior segment of the eye and able to show corneal layers and measures its thickness.
moria_microkeratome
participants had there lasik corneal flap creation using moria microkeratome
anterior segment OCT (Ocular Coherence Tomography) a device shows imaging of anterior segment of the eye and able to show corneal layers and measures its thickness.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
corneal flap thickness
Time Frame: 7 days
measuring the corneal flap thickness in nanometers postoperatively by anterior segment OCT
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
uncorrected visual acuity
Time Frame: 7 days
identifying uncorrected visual acuity postoperatively
7 days
best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: 7 days
identifying best corrected visual acuity postoperatively
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: GERGES F. YOUNAN, M.B.B.CH., Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 30, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • femtosecond_vs_microkeratome

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on anterior segment Ocular Coherence Tomography

Subscribe