Development and Evaluation of Hygie, a New Serious Game for Continuing Medical Education of General Practitioners

April 8, 2018 updated by: Louis-Baptiste Jaunay, Hygie

Development and Evaluation of Hygie, a New Serious Game for Continuing Medical Education of General Practitioners: a Randomized Trial

We produced a prototype video game called Hygie on the 5 most common reasons of consultation in general practice using 9 articles from independent journals based on evidence (reviews by Prescrire and Minerva). We then carried out a randomized trial comparing the learning provided by a week of access to the game versus source articles, in a population of clinical supervisors (CS) from 13 French departments of general practice.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Continuing medical education is important but burdensome work for general practitioners. Current training tools have limitations and may lack the ability to engage some practitioners. Serious games are new pedagogical tools that use video games as engaging education tools. They have significant advantages in terms of efficiency and dissemination.

The aim of this work was to create a new serious game and to evaluate it in terms of efficiency and satisfaction, comparing it with a traditional method of continuing education: article reading.

We produced a prototype video game called Hygie on the 5 most common reasons of consultation in general practice using 9 articles from independent journals based on evidence (reviews by Prescrire and Minerva). We then carried out a randomized trial comparing the learning provided by a week of access to the game versus source articles, in a population of clinical supervisors (CS) from 14 French departments of general practice.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3398

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75018
        • Paris diderot University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • to be a french general practice clinical supervisor

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Hygie game
Prototype video game called Hygie on the 5 most common reasons of consultation in general practice using 9 articles from independent journals based on evidence (reviews by Prescrire and Minerva).
Prototype video game called Hygie, accessible on the Internet, on the 5 most common reasons of consultation in general practice using 9 articles from independent journals based on evidence (reviews by Prescrire and Minerva).
Active Comparator: Source articles
9 articles from independent journals based on evidence (reviews by Prescrire and Minerva)
9 articles from independent journals based on evidence (reviews by Prescrire and Minerva), about the 5 most common reasons of consultation in general practice, accessible on the Internet.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knowledge test
Time Frame: completed 3 to 5 weeks after the end of the intervention, i.e. 4 to 6 weeks after randomization
Mean score at a final knowledge test
completed 3 to 5 weeks after the end of the intervention, i.e. 4 to 6 weeks after randomization
Delta knowledge
Time Frame: pretest before randomization, posttest 3 to 5 weeks after the end of the intervention (i.e. 4 to 6 weeks after randomization)
Mean difference score between knowledge pretest and final knowledge test (posttest
pretest before randomization, posttest 3 to 5 weeks after the end of the intervention (i.e. 4 to 6 weeks after randomization)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction
Time Frame: one week after randomization (end of access to support)
Satisfaction survey completed at the end of the intervention access week
one week after randomization (end of access to support)
Playing time
Time Frame: during the first week of access to support of intervention
Time spended playing by subjects assigned to Hygie
during the first week of access to support of intervention
Use in practice
Time Frame: completed 3 to 5 weeks after the end of the intervention, i.e. 4 to 6 weeks after randomization
completed 3 to 5 weeks after the end of the intervention, participants answer the question "In the course of your practice, did you use the knowledge you learned through the teaching material?"
completed 3 to 5 weeks after the end of the intervention, i.e. 4 to 6 weeks after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 31, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 6, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 6, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

all collected IPD

IPD Sharing Time Frame

if asked

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

requests will be considered individually

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION

Subscribe