Fujifilm DBT Plus S-View Versus FFDM Alone in the Detection of Breast Cancer

June 8, 2020 updated by: Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Inc.

A Multi-Reader Multi-Case Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Comparative Accuracy of the Fujifilm DBT Plus S-View Versus FFDM Alone in the Detection of Breast Cancer - A Pilot Study

The purpose of this pilot is to provide credible performance estimate information in order to conduct a subsequent pivotal reader study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This clinical research is a retrospective, pilot, multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) study with an enriched sample of 100 breast screening or diagnostic cases which were selected from the library of mammograms collected under Fujifilm protocol FMSU2013-004A (all subjects previously provided written informed consent agreeing their image data and supporting documentation could be used for future research and investigations). Approximately 6 qualified radiologists will independently perform two reads on all (approximately 100) cases. Each reader will read each case both as a FFDM (Full Field Digital Mammography) read, and a DBT (Digital Breast Tomosynthesis) plus S-View (Synthesized View) read on the ASPIRE Bellus II workstation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • Norwalk, Connecticut, United States, 06851
        • International HealthCare, LLC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

This clinical research is a retrospective, pilot, multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) study with an enriched sample of 100 breast screening or diagnostic cases which were selected from the library of mammograms collected under Fujifilm protocol FMSU2013-004A (all subjects previously provided written informed consent agreeing their image data and supporting documentation could be used for future research and investigations).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female subjects participating in FMSU2013-004A protocol with known clinical status

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female subjects that did not have known clinical status in FMSU2013-004A

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Crossover
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
DBT plus S-View
Breast images utilizing DBT plus S-View
DBT plus S-View images
FFDM alone
Breast images using FFDM alone only
FFDM alone images

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare Per Subject Average Area Under the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) Curve (AUC)
Time Frame: 2 visits with 4 week washout period
Compare per subject average area under the ROC curve (AUC) for DBT (Digital Breast Tomosynthesis) plus S-View (Synthesized View) versus FFDM (Full Field Digital Mammography), based on per-subject POM (probability of malignancy) scores and requiring correct lesion localization. The primary endpoint was non-inferior per-subject average AUC. Statistician estimated AUCs for each reader in each review condition (FFDM, DBT plus S-View) based on per-subject POM scores requiring correct lesion localization. Statistician also calculated for each reader the non-parametric (trapezoidal) AUC for the FFDM read, the DBT plus S-View read, and the difference between them. These AUC's, differences between them, and the associated variance-covariance matrix were obtained using the method of DeLong, et al.
2 visits with 4 week washout period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laurie L. Fajardo, M.D., independent contractor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 3, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FMSU2017-002A

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on DBT plus S-View

3
Subscribe