Patient Satisfaction in Treatment of Non-complex Fractures and Dislocations in Hospitals vs General Practitioners

May 16, 2021 updated by: dr. T. Verbeek, University Medical Center Groningen

Patient Satisfaction in Treatment of Non-complex Fractures and Dislocations in Hospitals Versus in General Practitioners in the Netherlands: Prospective Cohort Study Protocol

Treatment of fractures and dislocations are generally organized in the hospital setting. However, equal care for patients with non-complex fractures or dislocations may be provided in general practices. While substitution of trauma care from the secondary to the primary care setting is stimulated by the government and insurers, it is unknown what the patient satisfaction level is and which determinants affect this patient satisfaction. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to determine the effect of treatment in a general practice on patient satisfaction compared to treatment in a hospital. The secondary objectives include assessments in quality of life, patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Besides, results will be discussed using a small focus group consisting of patients (n=15 per group) and healthcare providers.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

117

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Friesland
      • Lemmer, Friesland, Netherlands, 8531EB
        • General Practice Zorgplein Lemmer
      • Sneek, Friesland, Netherlands, 8601 ZK
        • Antonius Hospital Sneek

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Two hundred patients with an X-ray confirmed diagnosis of a non-complex fracture or dislocation and planned to be treated in either the general practice Zorgplein Lemmer or Antonius Hospital Sneek will be recruited, 100 per center.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • X-ray confirmed diagnosis of a non-complex fracture or dislocation, which can be treated in the primary care setting according to the treatment protocol.
  • Ability of the patient or assigned representative to understand the content of the patient information/informed consent form.
  • Signed and dated written informed consent. Parents of patients of age 12-17 must provide a signed and dated written informed consent as well.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of age 11 years and younger.
  • Patients presenting outside ordinary business hours.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
General Practice
Hundred patients with an X-ray confirmed diagnosis of a non-complex fracture or dislocation and planned to be treated in the general practice Zorgplein Lemmer.
In both groups, all procedures and management will be done according to the hospital's standard of care.
Hospital
Hundred patients with an X-ray confirmed diagnosis of a non-complex fracture or dislocation and planned to be treated in the Antonius Hospital Sneek.
In both groups, all procedures and management will be done according to the hospital's standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 12 weeks after treatment
Patient satisfaction measured using the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18)
12 weeks after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 week and 6 weeks after treatment
Patient satisfaction measured using the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18)
1 week and 6 weeks after treatment
Complications of treatment
Time Frame: 12 weeks after treatment
Assessment of treatment complications
12 weeks after treatment
Pain score
Time Frame: 12 weeks after treatment
Assessment of pain score using a visual-analogue scale (VAS)
12 weeks after treatment
Physical functioning
Time Frame: 12 weeks after treatment
Physical functioning according to the 12-item World Health Organisation (WHO) Disability Assessment Schedule II
12 weeks after treatment
Limitations in functions of upper extremities (if applicable)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after treatment
Limitations in functions of upper extremities according to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire
12 weeks after treatment
General health status
Time Frame: 12 weeks after treatment
General health status according to the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)
12 weeks after treatment
Quality of life
Time Frame: 12 weeks after treatment
Quality of life using the EuroQol (EQ5D) questionnaire
12 weeks after treatment
Time consumption
Time Frame: 1 week, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after treatment
Time consumption (waiting time, treatment time, travelling time)
1 week, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after treatment
Costs
Time Frame: 12 weeks after treatment
Costs of treatment
12 weeks after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 25, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20170277

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fractures, Bone

Clinical Trials on Standard trauma care

Subscribe