Surgeons' Satisfaction With Two Types of Tinted Chlorhexidine Applicators (Chloraprep® and Nex Clorex 2%)

April 24, 2018 updated by: Cristina Fernandez Perez

Comparative Study to Asses the Satisfaction With Tinted Chlorhexidine Applicators (Chloraprep® and Nex Clorex 2%)

The development of surgical site infections (SSI) in clean-contaminated surgery is regarded as being preventable. Known to be effective in the prevention of surgical site infection are the adequate sterilization of the surgical instruments, asepsis during operation, antibiotic prophylaxis where indicated, and certainly the preparation of the skin at the incision site. During the last decades the use of alcoholic chlorhexidine has replaced povidone iodine for preoperative skin preparation. In order to improve the way alcoholic chlorhexidine is applied, pharmaceutical industry has developed new applicators.

This randomized study was conducted to know the surgeons' satisfaction within the use of two tinted applicators: Chloraprep® and Nex Clorex 2%

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteer surgeons from colon, cardiac, knee and hip surgical departments. Once surgeon has enrolled the study, patients will be selected if they have hospital admission with scheduled surgery and have signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Urgent surgeries
  • Outpatient surgery
  • Surgical complex cures
  • Mixed interventions: exploratory or sequential
  • Unscheduled surgeries
  • Rejection of participation
  • Chlorhexidine or isopropyl alcohol hypersensibility patients
  • If any patients changed its mind after signing the informed consent will be removed from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Knee surgeons
Four knee surgeons
We randomized knee, hip, cardiac and colon surgeons making them using two applicators of each brand in four of theirs surgeries. Randomization will be carried out in blocks of four for each surgeon.
We randomized knee, hip, cardiac and colon surgeons making them using two applicators of each brand in four of theirs surgeries. Randomization will be carried out in blocks of four for each surgeon.
Active Comparator: Hip surgeons
Six hip surgeons
We randomized knee, hip, cardiac and colon surgeons making them using two applicators of each brand in four of theirs surgeries. Randomization will be carried out in blocks of four for each surgeon.
We randomized knee, hip, cardiac and colon surgeons making them using two applicators of each brand in four of theirs surgeries. Randomization will be carried out in blocks of four for each surgeon.
Active Comparator: Cardiac surgeons
6 cardiac surgeons
We randomized knee, hip, cardiac and colon surgeons making them using two applicators of each brand in four of theirs surgeries. Randomization will be carried out in blocks of four for each surgeon.
We randomized knee, hip, cardiac and colon surgeons making them using two applicators of each brand in four of theirs surgeries. Randomization will be carried out in blocks of four for each surgeon.
Active Comparator: Colon surgeons
6 colon surgeons
We randomized knee, hip, cardiac and colon surgeons making them using two applicators of each brand in four of theirs surgeries. Randomization will be carried out in blocks of four for each surgeon.
We randomized knee, hip, cardiac and colon surgeons making them using two applicators of each brand in four of theirs surgeries. Randomization will be carried out in blocks of four for each surgeon.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgeon's global satisfaction with the applicators.
Time Frame: Intraoperative

Using an analog visual scale we will record the total score, over a maximum of 80 points, that assess the following quality aspects of the applicators:

  • Satisfaction with the presentation of the product
  • Satisfaction with the simplicity of activation
  • Satisfaction with the mix of the different components of the product
  • Satisfaction with the comfort of product use
  • Satisfaction with the surface covered by an applicator
  • Satisfaction with the shape of the applicator for painting areas of difficult access
  • Satisfaction with the drying time of the product
  • Satisfaction with the area delimited with the use of the product
Intraoperative
Qualities of each applicators
Time Frame: Intraoperative

Using an analog visual scale, were one end represents "totally disagree" and the other "totally agree" (0-10 points), we will record the score of each of the following quality aspects of the applicators:

  • Satisfaction with the presentation of the product
  • Satisfaction with the simplicity of activation
  • Satisfaction with the mix of the different components of the product
  • Satisfaction with the comfort of product use
  • Satisfaction with the surface covered by an applicator
  • Satisfaction with the shape of the applicator for painting areas of difficult access
  • Satisfaction with the drying time of the product
  • Satisfaction with the area delimited with the use of the product
Intraoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Costs of using the applicators
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Adhesion to preoperative measures to avoid surgical site infections (SSI)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months

Analyze the verification check list for surgical site infection preoperative prevention. This check list has been provided by the Preventive Medicine, Public Health and Hygiene Spanish Society as part of the Zero Surgical Site Infection Protocol.

This verification check list includes indicators of:

  • Antibiotic prophylaxis
  • Intraoperative Alcoholic Chlorhexidine application
  • Hair removal from the surgical site
  • Normotherapy
  • Glycemic control
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Surgical site infection incidence
Time Frame: During the first 30 to 90 days after surgery, according to the SSI prevention protocol
During the first 30 to 90 days after surgery, according to the SSI prevention protocol

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CA-IQZ

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Satisfaction

Clinical Trials on Surgical tinted Chloraprep® applicators

Subscribe