Combined Fluoroscopy and CT Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Thoracic Dorsal Root Ganglia in Severe Thoracic Pain

May 25, 2018 updated by: Ehab Hanafy Shaker, National Cancer Institute, Egypt

A Modified Technique of Combined Fluoroscopy and CT Guided Thermal Radiofrequency Ablation of Thoracic Dorsal Root Ganglia in Intractable Pain Associated With Thoracic Malignancies: A Randomized Clinical Trial

In the current study, extra-guidance other than conventional fluoroscopy - will be integrated to improve the success of the transforaminal approach to the thoracic dorsal root ganglia (DRG). The investigators hypothesize that joining CT scan with fluoroscopy to guide RF ablation through the transforaminal route may enhance its efficacy and safety in relieving the intractable pain associated with chest malignancies. The current study aimed to compare the results of thermal radiofrequency ablation (TRFA) of the thoracic DRG under combined CT and fluoroscopy guidance with the classic standard fluoroscopy technique.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Thoracic pain represents about 3-5% of pain clinics' visitors worldwide .Post-thoracotomy pain occurs in 30%-50% of patients undergoing thoracotomy .Interventional therapies include epidural or intrathecal drug injection, intercostal nerve block, sympathectomy, rhizotomy, and percutaneous cervical cordotomy. Rhizotomy refers to the selective segmental destruction of the dorsal sensory rootlets to interrupt pain perception by the spinal cord. This could be accomplished either neurosurgically, chemically or using selective percutaneous procedures such as cryoanalgesia and radiofrequency (RF) ablation.There are many technical difficulties in approaching the deep-seated thoracic dorsal root ganglia (DRG) through the transforaminal route.The spine is kyphotic - with the tip at T6 - and slightly scoliotic to the right side even in normal subjects . Spinous processes are acute, especially at T5-T8 level. Besides, broad and wide laminae together with narrow intervertebral foramina are other obstacles .The intervertebral foramina are further masked by the facet joints and the crowdedness of the costovertebral and the costotransverse joints .For all these factors, more guidance - other than conventional fluoroscopy - may improve the success of the transforaminal approach to the thoracic DRG. The investigators hypothesize that joining CT scan with fluoroscopy to guide RF ablation through the transforaminal route can enhance its efficacy and safety in relieving the intractable pain of chest malignancies. The current study aimed to compare the results of thermal radiofrequency ablation (TRFA) of the thoracic DRG under combined CT and fluoroscopy guidance with the classic standard fluoroscopy technique.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11796
        • Department of Anesthesia and Pain medicine.National Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients aged 18 years or more
  • suffering from chronic moderate-to-severe pain ( VAS score ≥ 40 mm)
  • due to malignancy involving the chest and pain was refractory to the maximally tolerated dose of opioids for at least four weeks. Malignancies included : lung cancer, pleural mesothelioma, chest wall tumors and metastatic deposits of the chest.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • sepsis, coagulopathy
  • malignant epidural invasion
  • distorted local anatomy
  • severe cardiorespiratory compromise
  • neuropsychiatric illness
  • history of drug dependence and known allergy to contrast media or the used medications.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Interventional:Combined CT-fluroscopy
Combined CT-fluroscopic radiofrequency ablation of thoracic dorsal root ganglia.
Radiofrequency ablation of thoracic dorsal root ganglia guided by combined CT-Fluroscopy
Active Comparator: Interventional: standard fluroscopy
Fluroscopic radiofrequency ablation of thoracic dorsal root ganglia.
Radiofrequency ablation of thoracic dorsal root ganglia guided by standard fluroscopy only

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain relief.
Time Frame: 12 weeks follow up
Pain intensity measured by visual analog scale (VAS).It measures the pain intensity and percentage of pain relief.The investigators used 100 mm horizontal scale with left zero end representing no pain and right 100 end representing worst pain.Scores ranging 0-39 reflect mild pain , 40-69 moderate pain and 70-100 severe pain.
12 weeks follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient satisfaction.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The secondary outcome measure will be assessed using patient satisfaction with the patient global impression of changes (PGIC).It measures the degree of patient overall satisfaction after the performed procedure. It includes 7 domains ranging from 1 to 7. the first domain indicates that the patient is very much improved while the 7th domain indicates that he is very much worsened by the procedure.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ehab H Shaker, MD, National Cancer Institute- Cairo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Raafat-Ehab.combined

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

It will be a shared team work study during which all the investigators will have equally distributed roles.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer-related Problem/Condition

Clinical Trials on combined CT-fluroscopy

3
Subscribe