Interventions Made to Preserve Cognitive Function (IMPCT)

June 27, 2025 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Hemodialysis-based Interventions to Preserve Cognitive Function

This is a randomized, controlled trial to slow cognitive decline in adults undergoing hemodialysis (HD). The investigators will test three interventions cognitive training (CT), exercise training (ET), and combined cognitive and exercise training (CT+ET) relative to standard of care (SC).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This will be a two by two factorial, randomized, controlled trial to slow cognitive decline in adults undergoing hemodialysis (HD). The investigators primary objective is to determine if receiving cognitive training (tablet-based brain games), exercise training (stationary foot pedal), or combined cognitive and exercise training preserves executive function relative to those with standard of care . The secondary objectives are to compare the rates of end stage renal disease (ESRD)-specific clinical outcomes and patient centered outcomes among those receiving CT, or ET, or CT+ET relative to those in SC. The investigators will formally test whether receiving CT or ET will preserve executive function and receiving combined CT+ET will preserve executive function better than CT or ET alone.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
        • Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • New York University Langone Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older at enrollment
  • English speaking
  • within 3 months to 3 years of initiating hemodialysis
  • receiving hemodialysis at participating dialysis centers

Exclusion Criteria: Patients with the following conditions will be excluded:

  • Pregnancy
  • Angina Pectoris
  • Chronic lung disease requiring oxygen
  • Musculoskeletal conditions that limit mobility
  • Upper or lower extremity amputation
  • Orthopedic disorders exacerbated by physical activity
  • Femoral arteriovenous (AV) access
  • Hepatitis B infection
  • Blindness/Legal blindness

In addition to conditions outlined above, patients who are currently incarcerated will be excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cognitive training
Participants randomized to CT will play "brain games" on a tablet. They will be asked to engage in the activity for a minimum of 30 minutes during each hemodialysis session for 6 months. At each HD session, participants will have 10 different brain games to play and the games will vary for each session.
The investigators will provide participants with tablets to play brain games.
Other Names:
  • CT
Active Comparator: Exercise training
Participants randomized to the ET arm will be given a stationary foot peddler and will be asked to engage in the activity for a minimum of 30 minutes at each hemodialysis session for 6 months. ET will start with a 2 minute warm up, then the resistance will be adjusted so that participants are working at perceived exertion of "somewhat strong," using the Borg scale (87) (~50 rpm). Resistance will be increased when the rating falls below "somewhat hard."
The investigators will provide participants with foot peddlers.
Other Names:
  • ET
Active Comparator: Combined cognitive and exercise training
Participants in the CT+ET arm will start with 30 minutes of CT (playing "brain games" on tablet) with a 15-minute break, and then, 30 minutes of ET (stationary foot peddler).
The investigators will provide participants with tablets to play brain games for cognitive training and stationary foot peddlers for exercise training.
Other Names:
  • CT+ET
No Intervention: Standard of Care
Participants in this arm will receive standard of care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Executive Function as Assessed by the Trail Making Test Assessment (TMT)
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in executive function between baseline and 3 months as assessed by the Trail Making Test which is comprised of Part A and Part B. Executive function is assessed by the time (seconds) to complete Part B minus the time (seconds) to complete Part A. Needing more time to complete the test indicates worse executive function.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Able to Return to Work
Time Frame: 12 months
The number of participants able to return to work during the 6 months of interventions and 6 months after interventions.
12 months
Change in Global Cognitive Function as Measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Change in global cognitive function at 3-months of interventions as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). It is a brief 30 question test that assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visual construction skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. Total possible score range is 0-30 points, and a score of 26 or above is considered normal.
Baseline, 3 months
Number of Participants Completing Executive Function as Measured by the Stroop Test
Time Frame: 3 months
Number completing the Stroop test of executive function at 3 months of interventions. The Stroop test asks participants to view two conflicting pieces of information, specifically the word itself and the color of the ink it's printed in. Participants are asked to name the color of the ink used to print words, rather than reading the words themselves.
3 months
Change in Executive Function as Measured by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months
Change in executive function at 3 months of interventions as measure by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test. This test evaluates the speed and working memory components of executive function. It involves a key consisting of the numbers 1-9, each paired with a unique, easy-to--draw symbol such as a "V", "+" or ">". Below the key are a series of the numbers 1-9 in random order and repeated several times. The participant is allowed 90 seconds to fill in the corresponding symbol for each number. This task requires the individual to visually scan the answer key provided at the top of the test and then write the correct symbol by each number as quickly as possible. The correct number of symbols written within 90 seconds is measured. Total possible score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 90 points. Higher scores represent better outcomes.
baseline and 3 months
Change in Physical Function as Measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Test
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in lower extremity function at 3 months of interventions using the SPPB test. The SPPB is an objective assessment tool for evaluating lower extremity functioning This test is a performance-based assessment comprised of 3 tasks: 1) repeated chair stands, 2) standing balance, and 3) a 4-meter usual paced walk in those with and without a walking aid (meters/second). Participants receive a score of 0 for a task if they were unable to complete the task; otherwise, they receive scores of 1-4 based on population-based norms. The scores of the three tasks are summed to create the SPPB score. The SPPB score ranges from 0 to 12, with lower scores indicating poorer function.
Baseline and 3 months
Number of Participants With an Injurious Fall
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of participants with an injurious falls resulting in a medical encounter during the 6 months of interventions and for 6 months after the interventions
12 months
Number of Participants With a Hospitalizations
Time Frame: 12 months
The number of participants with a hospitalizations during the 6 months of interventions and 6 months after the interventions
12 months
Mortality
Time Frame: 18 months
Mortality will be ascertained within the 6 months of the intervention and 1 year after the intervention (1.5 years total).
18 months
Change in Patient-centered Outcomes as Measured by the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL) Survey
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in kidney disease-specific physical and mental quality of life at 3 months. Using a single the question from the KDQOL: In general, would you say your health is ___ ? It is reported on a 5-point score: 1, poor; 2, fair; 3, good; 4, very good; 5, excellent. Higher is better. While the score of KDQOL ranges from 1 to 5 points, we are measuring the 3-month change in this score. Therefore, the change could range from -4 to 4 points.
Baseline and 3 months
Change in Patient-centered Outcomes as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in Patient-centered Outcomes as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 The change in PROMIS-29 score at 3 months is reported. Scores range from 0-140; higher scores are better.
Baseline and 3 months
Number of Participants With an Amputation
Time Frame: 12 months
The number of participants with an amputation during the 6 months of interventions and 6 months after interventions. This information will be either self-reported by the participant or abstracted from the medical records to see if the interventions are associated with amputations
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aarti Mathur, MD, PhD, Johns Hopkins University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 30, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 23, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00152858
  • R01DK114074 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ESRD

Clinical Trials on Cognitive training

Subscribe