HIT in People With Type 1 Diabetes

June 1, 2018 updated by: Sam Shepherd, Liverpool John Moores University

High-Intensity Interval Training Improves Aerobic Capacity and Abolishes the Decline in Blood Glucose Observed During Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training Sessions in People With Type 1 Diabetes

Few people with type 1 diabetes achieve exercise guidelines and many programmes designed to increase physical activity have failed. High-intensity interval training (HIT) has been shown to be a time-efficient alternative to traditional moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in various groups without type 1 diabetes. A single bout of HIT does not increase the risk of hypoglycaemia in people with type 1 diabetes. This study aimed to assess whether HIT a safe, effective and time-efficient training strategy to improve cardio-metabolic health and reduce the risk of hypoglycaemia in people with type 1 diabetes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study aimed to investigate whether 1) six weeks of high-intensity interval training (HIT) induces similar improvements in cardio-metabolic health markers as moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in people with type 1 diabetes, and 2) whether HIT abolishes acute reductions in plasma glucose observed following MICT sessions. Fourteen sedentary individuals with type 1 diabetes (n=7 per group) completed six weeks of HIT or MICT 3 times per week. Pre- and post-training measurements were made of 24h interstitial glucose profiles (using continuous glucose monitors (CGMS)) and cardio-metabolic health markers (V ̇O2peak, blood lipid profile and aortic pulse wave velocity; aPWV). Capillary blood glucose concentrations were assessed before and after exercise sessions throughout the training programme to investigate changes in blood glucose during exercise in the fed state.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Merseyside
      • Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom, L3 3AF
        • Liverpool John Moores University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • duration of type 1 diabetes >6 months
  • basal bolus regimen
  • no significant history of hyper- or hypoglycaemia (determined from medical history)

Exclusion Criteria:

duration of type 1 diabetes <6 months,

  • insulin pump therapy
  • significant history of hyper- or hypoglycaemia (determined from medical history)
  • obesity (BMI >30 kg∙m-2)
  • pregnancy or planning pregnancy
  • uncontrolled hypertension (>180/100 mmHg)
  • angina, autonomic neuropathy
  • taking any medication that affects heart rate
  • major surgery planned within 6 weeks of the study
  • severe nonproliferative
  • unstable proliferative retinopathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HIT training
6 weeks of high-intensity interval training (HIT)
Participants completed 6 weeks of HIT
Experimental: Moderate intensity training
6 weeks of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT)
Participants completed 6 weeks of MICT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximal aerobic capacity
Time Frame: change in baseline maximal aerobic capacity at 6 weeks
Maximal aerobic capacity test pre and post 6-week training intervention
change in baseline maximal aerobic capacity at 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vascular stiffness
Time Frame: change in baseline vascular stiffness at 6 weeks
Aortic pulse wave velocity to measure vascular stiffness
change in baseline vascular stiffness at 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 9, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No plans to make data available to others

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type1diabetes

Clinical Trials on HIT

3
Subscribe