Comparison of a Two Ready-to-use Supplementary Foods of Differing Protein Quality for the Treatment of MAM.

March 12, 2020 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine

Comparison of a Two Ready-to-use Supplementary Foods of Differing Protein Quality for the Treatment of Moderate Acute Malnutrition in Rural Malawian Children: a Randomised, Investigator-blinded, Clinical Effectiveness Trial.

This is a prospective, randomised, double-blinded, controlled clinical effectiveness trial of two supplementary foods in the treatment of MAM. The setting will be 21 rural sites in southern Malawi. The participants will be 1800 children 6-59 months old with MAM, defined as mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) ≥ 11.5 cm and < 12.5 cm and/or a weight-for-height Z-score (WHZ) between -2 and -3 without bipedal edema. Children will receive approximately 75 kcal/kg/d (314 kJ/kg/d) of one of two RUSFs in two-week rations for outpatient therapy of MAM. The two supplements will be a novel, locally produced peanut/dairy RUSFs, one with a high protein quality (HIPRO RUSF) or one with a standard protein quality, referred to as control RUSF (C-RUSF). The primary outcome measures will be recovery from MAM (achieving MUAC ≥ 12.5 cm and/or WHZ>-2 by 12 weeks) or failure (death, development of severe acute malnutrition, transfer to hospital for inpatient care, failure to recover from MAM by 12 weeks, default). Secondary outcome measures include rates of weight, height, and mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) gain, time to graduation, and adverse effects from the supplementary foods.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1858

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Blantyre, Malawi
        • Local Feeding Clinics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 4 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • MUAC < 12.5 cm and ≥ 11.5 cm
  • without bipedal edema

Exclusion Criteria:

  • simultaneously involved in another research trial or supplemental feeding program
  • developmentally delayed, have a chronic debilitating illness such as cerebral palsy
  • history of peanut or milk allergy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: C-RUSF
Control/Standard RUSF
-RUSF contains whey permeate, WPC 80, peanut paste, sugar, soy oil, canola oil, a customized micronutrient premix to account for the minerals in whey permeate, and an emulsifier
Other Names:
  • Ready-to-use supplementary food
Active Comparator: HIPRO RUSF
New RUSF product
HIPRO RUSF contains extruded soy flour, skimmed milk, peanut paste, sugar, soy oil, palm oil, a premix containing concentrated minerals and vitamins, an emulsifier and dicalcium phosphate or calcium carbonate
Other Names:
  • Ready-to-use supplementary food

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recovery from Moderate Acute Malnutrition using Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) and Weight for Height Z score (WHZ)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Number of participants achieving a Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) ≥ 12.5 cm and/or WHZ>-2 within a 12 week treatment period
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark Manary, MD, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 25, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 8, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 8, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 201805096

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malnutrition

Clinical Trials on C-RUSF

3
Subscribe