- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03559634
Contraception Initiation Feasibility in the Pediatric ED
Feasibility Trial of Hormonal Contraceptive Initiation Program in the Pediatric Emergency Department
Many female adolescents using the pediatric emergency department (ED) are at higher risk for unintended pregnancy. This is a significant public health issue and hormonal contraception is the mainstay of prevention. Many barriers to hormonal contraception exist and other studies have demonstrated that referral from the ED for hormonal contraception leads to poor follow up.
This study will be a pilot study to assess the feasibility of initiating hormonal contraception in the pediatric ED.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study will assess the feasibility of initiating hormonal contraception in the pediatric ED. Currently, all 15-21-year-old patients receiving care in our ED are asked to complete an adolescent heath questionnaire to identify risk-factors for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Sexually active female patients who indicate on this questionnaire they are not currently using hormonal contraception will be eligible for participation in this study.
Potential participants will be screened using the EMR and eligible patients will be approached. Consent will be obtained from adults directly and from a parent or guardian for minors that have one present. For minors that present without a parent or guardian, assent only with be obtained from the minor. Participants will be randomized into two groups, an intervention group and a control group. Participants in both groups will be given tablet computer and, through a software application on the tablet, answer questions electronically about their background, medical history, and contraceptive preferences. They will then be shown a video that provides an overview of hormonal contraceptive options. Depending on the participants medical history and contraceptive preferences, they may be offered more in-depth educational videos about specific types of hormonal contraception for which they are eligible (e.g. pill, transdermal patch, intravaginal ring, injection, and implant).
Once they have completed watching the videos, participants in the intervention group will have the option of initiating one of the offered forms of birth control during the ED visit. They will only be offered medications considered low risk and for which they do not have any medical contraindications. Urine pregnancy testing will be done before any method is given. They will be able to start any contraceptive method from among those offered after their screening. Participants in the control group will be offered outpatient referral to initiate contraception, the current standard of care in our ED. All patients in both arms of the study will be given referral/follow up options for further contraceptive care.
All participants in this study will then be followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months to determine continuation of contraception practices, follow up practices, satisfaction, and pregnancy rates.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
- Washington Univeristy at St Louis
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female patients, 15-21 years old that present to the SLCH pediatric ED
- Report history of vaginal sex on the ED routine screening questionnaire
- Not currently using hormonal contraception
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant
- Currently using hormonal contraception
- Foster care
- Non-English speaking
- Chief complaint of psychiatric concern, physical abuse or sexual abuse
- Triage acuity level 1 or 2 as they are likely to be too ill to participate
- Those with history of stroke, venous thromboembolism, actively being treated for cancer, or who have an organ transplant
- Too ill to participate as determined by the pediatric ED health care provider (attending physician or advanced practice nurse)
- Already participated in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention group
Using an electronic application, participants answer survey questions about their sexual history, medical history, and contraceptive preferences.
They will watch a video that overviews the types of hormonal contraception.
Then, based on survey answers, they will be able to watch more in-depth educational videos on methods that they qualify for.
Participants will only be offered methods that are considered low risk and without any contraindication based upon responses to survey screening.
This may include, contraceptive implant, medroxyprogesterone acetate injection, microgestin pills, xulane patch, or intravaginal ring.
Participants will then be given the opportunity to initiate contraception in the ED.
All participants will be referred for follow up outpatient health services.
Subjects who have medical contraindications to certain contraceptive medications will be given a standardized handout that explains why they were not eligible for the medication(s) while in the ED.
|
The electronic application will collect screening health information and contraceptive preferences about the participant.
Then, using branch logic, decide which contraceptive options the participant would qualify for based on health history answers.
Contraceptive choices being offered include the contraceptive implant, injection, pill, patch, or ring.
They will then be able to watch videos about methods they are eligible for.
The participant can then decide if they would like to start a medication they qualify for in the ED.
|
|
Other: Control Group
Using an electronic application, participants answer survey questions about their background, sexual history, medical history, and contraceptive preferences.
They will watch a video that overviews the types of hormonal contraception with brief pros and cons of each method.
Then, based on participants medical history and contraceptive preferences they will be able to watch more in-depth counseling and educational videos on contraceptive methods that they qualify for.
After these videos they will be given information on where they will be able to follow up to receive these contraceptive methods if they wish to start a method.
Subjects who have medical contraindications to certain hormonal contraceptive medications will be given a standardized handout that explains why they were not eligible for the medication(s), should this come up in future discussions with their providers.
|
The electronic application will collect screening health information and contraceptive preferences about the participant.
Then, using branch logic, decide which contraceptive options the participant would qualify for based on health history answers.
This includes the contraceptive implant, injection, pill, patch, or ring.
They will then be able to watch videos about methods they are eligible for.
Participants will then be given follow up information on outpatient locations where they can receive these contraceptive methods.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Initiation of contraception in the ED using the electronic application
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The proportion of enrolled patients that initiate contraception when offered same-day (intervention arm) compared to those that initiate contraception at follow up (the control arm) at 3 months.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Delivery process related outcomes #1
Time Frame: At initial encounter.
|
Total length of time of the intervention beginning after consent and ending with provision of contraception, contraceptive script, or declining initiation of contraception.
|
At initial encounter.
|
|
Delivery process related outcomes #2
Time Frame: At initial encounter.
|
Subject length of stay defined by arrival time to disposition (admit or discharge) from ED.
|
At initial encounter.
|
|
Delivery process related outcomes #3
Time Frame: At initial encounter and at follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months.
|
Patient experience and satisfaction survey both directly after program and at follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Likert 5 point scale will be used with the following rating options strongly agree, agree, no opinion, disagree, or strongly disagree.
Data will be stored in original language and in a numerical scale, with a range of 1 to 5 with 5 for the question being better experience/satisfaction.
Following completion of enrollment, all data will be aggregated and analyzed to determine mean and standard deviation of all questions.
|
At initial encounter and at follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months.
|
|
Delivery process related outcomes #4
Time Frame: At initial encounter.
|
Providers (doctors and nurses) experience and satisfaction survey for initial visit in ED.
Likert 5 point scale will be used with the following rating options strongly agree, agree, no opinion, disagree, or strongly disagree.
Data will be stored in original language and in a numerical scale, with a range of 1 to 5 with 5 for the question being better experience/satisfaction.
Following completion of enrollment, all data will be aggregated and analyzed to determine mean and standard deviation of all questions.
|
At initial encounter.
|
|
Contraceptive continuation
Time Frame: At 3,6, and 12 months.
|
Percentage of participants that are using hormonal contraception in the intervention group as compared to the control group at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.
|
At 3,6, and 12 months.
|
|
Pregnancy rates
Time Frame: 12 months.
|
The number of participants that become pregnant within 12 months in the intervention group verses the control group.
|
12 months.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reproductive Health: Teen Pregnancy. http://www.cdc.gov/teepregnancy/about/index.htm. Accessed Sept 2016.
- Ahmad FA, Jeffe DB, Plax K, Schechtman KB, Doerhoff DE, Garbutt JM, Jaffe DM. Characteristics of youth agreeing to electronic sexually transmitted infection risk assessment in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2018 Jan;35(1):46-51. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206199. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for adolescent health care. 2011; http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Adolescent-Health-Care. Accessed Dec 2016.
- American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Statement on Teen Pregnancy and Contraception. 2015; http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/Statements/2015/ACOG-Statement-on-Teen-Pregnancy-and-Contraception. Accessed Dec 2016.
- Committee on Adolescence. Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;134(4):e1244-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2299.
- Healthy People 2020. Family Planning, Adolescent Health. 2014; https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020, 2017.
- Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine; Burke PJ, Coles MS, Di Meglio G, Gibson EJ, Handschin SM, Lau M, Marcell AV, Tebb KP, Urbach K. Sexual and reproductive health care: a position paper of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. J Adolesc Health. 2014 Apr;54(4):491-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.010. No abstract available.
- Chernick LS, Schnall R, Higgins T, Stockwell MS, Castano PM, Santelli J, Dayan PS. Barriers to and enablers of contraceptive use among adolescent females and their interest in an emergency department based intervention. Contraception. 2015 Mar;91(3):217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
- Chernick LS, Westhoff C, Ray M, Garcia M, Garth J, Santelli J, Dayan PS. Enhancing referral of sexually active adolescent females from the emergency department to family planning. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Apr;24(4):324-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4994.
- Ahmad FA, Jeffe DB, Plax K, Collins KK, Schechtman KB, Doerhoff DE, Garbutt J, Jaffe DM. Computerized self-interviews improve Chlamydia and gonorrhea testing among youth in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;64(4):376-84. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.031. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 201805104
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Contraception
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityCompletedPregnancy Related | Contraception | Contraception Behavior | Contraception Use
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...CompletedFemale Contraception | Contraception
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...Completed
-
Medical University of South CarolinaSociety of Family PlanningCompletedContraception | Contraception BehaviorUnited States
-
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.CompletedFemale Contraception | ContraceptionUnited States, Israel
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...Completed
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...CompletedFemale Contraception | Contraception
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...CompletedFemale Contraception | Contraception
-
Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., BelgiumCompleted
-
Montefiore Medical CenterSociety of Family PlanningCompletedContraception | Breastfeeding | Postpartum ContraceptionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Intervention Group
-
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Beijing HospitalThe First Hospital of Jilin University; Jilin University; Chinese Academy of...Not yet recruitingAsthma | Allergic Disease
-
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreUnknown
-
University of LiegeCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege; Bial Foundation; FNRS (Télévie); Fondation...Active, not recruitingPain | Cancer | Fatigue | Cognitive Impairment | Sleep Disturbance | Distress, EmotionalBelgium
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedHeart Diseases | Cardiovascular Diseases
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Cancer Prevention Institute of CaliforniaCompletedHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome
-
University of Sao PauloCompletedAnxiety | Self Esteem
-
Shenzhen Salubris Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.Salubris (Suzhou) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.RecruitingPostmenopausal Women With OsteoporosisChina
-
Haute Ecole de Santé VaudCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipSwitzerland
-
TC Erciyes UniversityNot yet recruitingNeuropathic Pain | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)Turkey (Türkiye)