- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03567863
Study Comparing Pancreatic EUS-FNB With the 20-gauge Procore® and the 22-gauge Acquire® Needles (HISTOPAN)
Multicentric Randomized Study Comparing the Histological and Molecular Material Quality Obtained by EUS-FNB of Pancreatic Mass With Two "Biopsic" Needles: the 20-gauge Procore® (Cook) and the 22-gauge Acquire® (Boston Scientific)
Multicenter randomized prospective study
Criteria for inclusion:
Patients admitted for EUS-FNB of a pancreatic mass
Goals of the study:
To compare the results of blinded punctures for suspicion of pancreatic tumor performed under endoscopic ultrasound in our center (Digestive Endoscopy Unit of the Digestive Pole Paris Bercy, PDPB), in terms of diagnosis and quality of histopathological material obtained with the help of 20G Procore, Cook and 22G Acquire needles, Boston Scientific.
Main criterion:
- Biopsy core length of target tissue obtained by needle pass
Number of patients:
60 patients
Duration of the study:
1 year
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Type of study:
Multicenter randomized prospective study
Criteria for inclusion:
Patients admitted for ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY (EUS-FNB) of a pancreatic mass
Exclusion criteria:
Patients with an extra-pancreatic mass puncture Echendoscopic puncture contraindication or vascular interposition
Goals of the study:
To compare the results of blinded punctures for suspicion of pancreatic tumor performed under endoscopic ultrasound in our center (Digestive Endoscopy Unit of the Digestive Pole Paris Bercy, PDPB), in terms of diagnosis and quality of histopathological material obtained with the help of 20G Procore, Cook and 22G Acquire needles, Boston Scientific.
Evaluation criteria :
Main criterion:
- Biopsy core length of target tissue obtained by needle pass
Secondary criteria
- Presence of a core biopsy specimen
- Sensitivity of EUS-FNB for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas
- False negative rate, Negative predictive value for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma
- Computer Aided Morphometric Evaluation of the Tumor + Stroma Surface on All core biopsy specimens
- Success rate of isolation of tumor cells and determination of transcriptomic signatures of pancreatic adenocarcinoma subtypes
- Immediate complications of puncture
- Variation in the quality of the puncture following the trans-duodenal or trans-gastric access route
- Technical failure rate of puncture
- Optional: inter and intra-observer evaluation of the anatomopathological criteria used (presence of a biopsy core, length of target tissue core per needle passage)
Number of patients:
60 patients
Duration of the study:
1 year
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ile De France
-
Charenton-le-Pont, Ile De France, France, 94220
- David Karsenti
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient admitted to one of the investigative centers for endoscopic pancreatic puncture during the period from April 1, 2018 to April 1, 2019
- Patient whose age is greater than or equal to 18 years and less than 90 years
- Patient ASA 1, ASA 2, ASA 3 (ASA: American Society of Anaesthesiologists Classification)
- Lack of participation in another clinical study
- Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients punctured with an extra-pancreatic mass
- Patient under the age of 18 or over 90
- Patient ASA 4, ASA 5
- Pregnant woman
- Patient with coagulation abnormalities preventing puncture: TP <50%, Platelets <50000 / mm3, effective anticoagulation in progress, clopidogrel in progress
- Vascular or ductal or surgical fixation (Billroth II, Roux in Y) preventing endoscopic access to the lesion to be punctured
- Patient unable to personally consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group A
The two punctures performed successively with the 20-GAUGE PROCORE® (COOK) and the 22-GAUGE ACQUIRE® (BOSTON SCIENTIFIC) 20-GAUGE PROCORE® first, then 22-GAUGE ACQUIRE® |
The two punctures performed successively with the 20-GAUGE PROCORE® (COOK) and the 22-GAUGE ACQUIRE® (BOSTON SCIENTIFIC)
|
|
Active Comparator: Group B
The two punctures performed successively with the 22-GAUGE ACQUIRE® (BOSTON SCIENTIFIC) and the 20-GAUGE PROCORE® (COOK) 22-GAUGE ACQUIRE® first, then 20-GAUGE PROCORE® |
The two punctures performed successively with the 22-GAUGE ACQUIRE® (BOSTON SCIENTIFIC) and the 20-GAUGE PROCORE® (COOK)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
cumulative length of tissue core biopsies per needle pass
Time Frame: in the 7 days after procedure
|
cumulative length of tissue core biopsies per needle pass in mm
|
in the 7 days after procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Presence of core biopsy specimen
Time Frame: in the 7 days after procedure
|
Presence of core biopsy specimen
|
in the 7 days after procedure
|
|
Sensitivity
Time Frame: in the 7 days or 6 months
|
EUS-FNB Sensitivity for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas
|
in the 7 days or 6 months
|
|
Specificity
Time Frame: in the 7 days or 6 months
|
EUS-FNB Specificity for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas
|
in the 7 days or 6 months
|
|
Positive Predictive Value
Time Frame: in the 7 days or 6 months
|
EUS-FNB Positive predictive value for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas
|
in the 7 days or 6 months
|
|
Negative Predictive Value
Time Frame: in the 7 days or 6 months
|
EUS-FNB Negative Predictive Value for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas
|
in the 7 days or 6 months
|
|
Computer Aided Morphometric Evaluation of the Tumor + Stroma Surface
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Computer Aided Morphometric Evaluation of the Tumor + Stroma Surface on All Core biopsies
|
6 months
|
|
Success rate of isolation of tumor cells
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Success rate of isolation of tumor cells
|
6 months
|
|
Morbidity
Time Frame: 7 days
|
Puncture Morbidity (acute pancreatitis, haemorrhage)
|
7 days
|
|
Feasibility
Time Frame: during procedure
|
Technical failure rate of puncture because of a impossibility to access to pancreatic mass with the needle (due to the needle stiffness)
|
during procedure
|
|
inter evaluation of the anatomopathological criteria used (presence of a biopsy core, length of target tissue core per needle pass)
Time Frame: 7 days
|
inter evaluation of the anatomopathological criteria used (presence of a biopsy core, length of target tissue core per needle pass)
|
7 days
|
|
determination of transcriptomic signatures of pancreatic adenocarcinoma subtypes
Time Frame: 6 months
|
determination of transcriptomic signatures of pancreatic adenocarcinoma subtypes
|
6 months
|
|
intra-observer evaluation of the anatomopathological criteria used
Time Frame: 7 days
|
intra-observer evaluation of the anatomopathological criteria used
|
7 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David KARSENTI, MD, Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chen TY, Cao JW, Jin C, Ji Y, Zhong L, Wang LM, Cui N, Di Y, Bao Y, Zhong N, Zhang YQ, Zhou PH. Comparison of specimen quality among the standard suction, slow-pull, and wet suction techniques for EUS-FNA: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Endosc Ultrasound. 2022 Sep-Oct;11(5):393-400. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00163.
- Ishikawa H, Yamada M, Sato Y, Tanaka S, Akiko C, Tajika M, Doyama H, Takayama T, Ohda Y, Horimatsu T, Sano Y, Tanakaya K, Ikematsu H, Saida Y, Ishida H, Takeuchi Y, Kashida H, Kiriyama S, Hori S, Lee K, Tashiro J, Kobayashi N, Nakajima T, Suzuki S, Mutoh M; J-FAPP Study III Group. Intensive endoscopic resection for downstaging of polyp burden in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (J-FAPP Study III): a multicenter prospective interventional study. Endoscopy. 2022 Oct 10. doi: 10.1055/a-1945-9120. Online ahead of print.
- Chen TY, Cao JW, Jin C, Ji Y, Zhong L, Wang LM, Cui N, Di Y, Bao Y, Zhong N, Zhang YQ, Zhou PH. Comparison of specimen quality among the standard suction, slow-pull, and wet suction techniques for EUS-FNA: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Endosc Ultrasound. 2022 Jun 8. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00163. [Epub ahead of print]
- Motz VL, Lester C, Moyer MT, Maranki JL, Levenick JM. Hybrid argon plasma coagulation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile colon polyps to reduce local recurrence: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy. 2022 Jun;54(6):580-584. doi: 10.1055/a-1677-3954. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
- Park E, Barge W, Kramer J, Alajati B, Jakate S, Cimbaluk D, Giusto D, Ritz E, Bishehsari F, Lee S, Singh S, Losurdo J, Brown M, DeMeo M, Abraham R, Ma K, Melson J. Interobserver reliability of methods to determine complete resection of adenomas in colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2021 Dec;53(12):1250-1255. doi: 10.1055/a-1331-4446. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
- de Benito Sanz M, Hernandez L, Garcia Martinez MI, Diez-Redondo P, Joao Matias D, Gonzalez-Santiago JM, Ibanez M, Nunez Rodriguez MH, Cimavilla M, Tafur C, Mata L, Guardiola-Arevalo A, Feito J, Garcia-Alonso FJ; POLIPEC HOT-COLD Study Group. Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for small (5-9 mm) colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2022 Jan;54(1):35-44. doi: 10.1055/a-1327-8357. Epub 2021 Feb 18. Erratum In: Endoscopy. 2021 Nov 30;:
- Nakamura M, Yano T, Esaki M, Oka S, Mitsui K, Hirai F, Kawasaki K, Fujishiro M, Torisu T, Tanaka S, Iwakiri K, Kishi M, Matsumoto T, Yamamoto H. Novel ultrathin double-balloon endoscopy for the diagnosis of small-bowel diseases: a multicenter nonrandomized study. Endoscopy. 2021 Aug;53(8):802-814. doi: 10.1055/a-1243-0226. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
- Meng W, Yue P, Leung JW, Wang H, Wang X, Wang F, Zhu K, Zhang L, Zhu X, Wang Z, Zhang H, Zhou W, Li X. Impact of mechanical simulator practice on clinical ERCP performance by novice surgical trainees: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2020 Nov;52(11):1004-1013. doi: 10.1055/a-1217-6727. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
- Kovacevic B, Klausen P, Rift CV, Toxvaerd A, Grossjohann H, Karstensen JG, Brink L, Hassan H, Kalaitzakis E, Storkholm J, Hansen CP, Hasselby JP, Vilmann P. Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided through-the-needle microbiopsy in patients with pancreatic cysts. Endoscopy. 2021 Jan;53(1):44-52. doi: 10.1055/a-1214-6043. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
- Subramaniam S, Kandiah K, Chedgy F, Fogg C, Thayalasekaran S, Alkandari A, Baker-Moffatt M, Dash J, Lyons-Amos M, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Brown J, Bhandari P. A novel self-assembling peptide for hemostasis during endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2021 Jan;53(1):27-35. doi: 10.1055/a-1198-0558. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
- Zhang Y, Liu L, Wang Q, Guo L, Ye L, Zeng H, Zeng X, Yuan X, Li Y, Zhang Y, Zhou E, Hu B. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with additional radiotherapy in the treatment of T1a esophageal squamous cell cancer: randomized controlled Trial. Endoscopy. 2020 Dec;52(12):1066-1074. doi: 10.1055/a-1198-5232. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
- Seicean A, Samarghitan A, Bolboaca SD, Pojoga C, Rusu I, Rusu D, Sparchez Z, Gheorghiu M, Al Hajjar N, Seicean R. Contrast-enhanced harmonic versus standard endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions: a single-center prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2020 Dec;52(12):1084-1090. doi: 10.1055/a-1193-4954. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
- Alvarez-Gonzalez MA, Pantaleon Sanchez MA, Bernad Cabredo B, Garcia-Rodriguez A, Frago Larramona S, Nogales O, Diez Redondo P, Puig Del Castillo I, Romero Mascarell C, Caballero N, Romero Sanchez-Miguel I, Perez Berbegal R, Hernandez Negrin D, Bujedo Sadornill G, Perez Oltra A, Casals Urquiza G, Amoros Martinez J, Seoane Urgorri A, Ibanez Zafon IA, Gimeno-Garcia AZ. Educational nurse-led telephone intervention shortly before colonoscopy as a salvage strategy after previous bowel preparation failure: a multicenter randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2020 Nov;52(11):1026-1035. doi: 10.1055/a-1178-9844. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
- Struyvenberg M, Kahn A, Fleischer D, Swager AF, Bouma B, Ganguly EK, Konda V, Lightdale CJ, Pleskow D, Sethi A, Smith M, Trindade AJ, Wallace MB, Wang K, Wolfsen HC, Tearney GJ, Curvers WL, Leggett CL, Bergman JJ. Expert assessment on volumetric laser endomicroscopy full scans in Barrett's esophagus patients with or without high grade dysplasia or early cancer. Endoscopy. 2021 Mar;53(3):218-225. doi: 10.1055/a-1194-0397. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
- Zwager LW, Bastiaansen BAJ, Bronzwaer MES, van der Spek BW, Heine GDN, Haasnoot KJC, van der Sluis H, Perk LE, Boonstra JJ, Rietdijk ST, Wolters HJ, Weusten BLAM, Gilissen LPL, Ten Hove WR, Nagengast WB, Bekkering FC, Schwartz MP, Terhaar Sive Droste JS, Vlug MS, Houben MHMG, Rando Munoz FJ, Seerden TCJ, Beaumont H, de Ridder R, Dekker E, Fockens P; Dutch eFTR Group. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) of colorectal lesions: results from the Dutch colorectal eFTR registry. Endoscopy. 2020 Nov;52(11):1014-1023. doi: 10.1055/a-1176-1107. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
- Karsenti D, Palazzo L, Perrot B, Zago J, Lemaistre AI, Cros J, Napoleon B. 22G Acquire vs. 20G Procore needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of pancreatic masses: a randomized study comparing histologic sample quantity and diagnostic accuracy. Endoscopy. 2020 Sep;52(9):747-753. doi: 10.1055/a-1160-5485. Epub 2020 May 14.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2018-A00276-49
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
-
Revolution Medicines, Inc.RecruitingPancreatic Cancer | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic | Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) | PDAC | PDAC - Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma MetastaticUnited States
-
Revolution Medicines, Inc.AvailablePancreatic Cancer | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic | Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma | PDAC | PDAC - Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Metastatic | Metastatic Pancreas Adenocarcinoma
-
Revolution Medicines, Inc.RecruitingPancreatic Cancer | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic | Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) | PDAC | PDAC - Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma MetastaticUnited States
-
PanTher TherapeuticsRecruitingPancreatic Cancer | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Borderline Resectable Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaUnited States
-
East Lancashire Hospitals NHS TrustNot yet recruitingPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (mPDAC)
-
Immuneering CorporationRecruitingPancreatic Cancer | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) | PDAC | PDAC - Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma MetastaticUnited States, Australia
-
OHSU Knight Cancer InstituteGenentech, Inc.; Oregon Health and Science University; American Association for... and other collaboratorsRecruitingStage II Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8 | Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Unresectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and other conditionsUnited States
-
Fudan UniversityUnknownStage IA Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Stage IB Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIB Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaChina
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisNot yet recruitingPancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Head CancerFrance
-
Revolution Medicines, Inc.RecruitingPancreatic Cancer | Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | PDAC | PDAC - Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)United States, Puerto Rico, United Kingdom
Clinical Trials on 20-GAUGE PROCORE® first, then 22-GAUGE ACQUIRE®
-
Société Française d'Endoscopie DigestiveCompletedPancreatic Tumor | PunctureFrance
-
Samsung Medical CenterOlympusCompletedPancreatic CancerKorea, Republic of
-
Seung Bae YoonSeoul St. Mary's HospitalCompletedPancreatic NeoplasmsKorea, Republic of
-
Samsun Education and Research HospitalCompletedEpidural AnesthesiaTurkey