- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07547033
Superior Mesenteric Artery First Versus Standard Approach in Pancreaticoduodenectomy (EQUINOXE)
"Pancreatic cancer, especially pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, is one of the most serious and deadly cancers. Its outlook is very poor, with fewer than 10% of patients surviving five years after diagnosis. This is largely because the disease is often discovered at a late stage and because it frequently comes back even after surgery.
When the tumor is located in the head of the pancreas, the only treatment that can potentially cure the disease is a major operation called a pancreaticoduodenectomy, also known as the Whipple procedure. This surgery is now safely performed in specialized hospitals, but it remains complex and carries a high risk of complications. Importantly, even after surgery, cancer cells often remain, leading to a high rate of local recurrence.
A newer surgical technique, known as the "artery-first" approach, changes the order of the operation. By carefully exposing a major blood vessel near the pancreas at the beginning of the surgery, surgeons can better assess whether the tumor can be completely removed and can improve the precision of the operation.
This research protocol aims to compare this artery-first technique with the standard surgical approach. The goal is to determine whether starting the operation by addressing the artery allows for more complete tumor removal and reduces the risk of cancer coming back in patients with pancreatic cancer of the head of the pancreas."
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
- Procedure: Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section.
- Procedure: SMA-first pancreaticoduodenectomy using either right posterior or anterior approach. SMA identified and isolated with peri-adventitial dissection before any irreversible section.
Detailed Description
"Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States and Europe by 2030. It remains the worst prognostic gastrointestinal cancer, with a 7-9% five-year overall survival (OS) rate. The majority of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, i.e., locally advanced (30%) or metastatic (50%), and more than 60% of the operated patients relapse within 3 years after surgery.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy: standard approach Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the only potentially curative technique for PDAC of the pancreatic head. The procedure, commonly named the Whipple procedure, was described in 1935 when O.Whipple reported the previously modified technique by A.Codinivillan and W.Keusch. In its current form, the Whipple procedure owes its evolution to many physicians and surgeons' groundbreaking and innovative work. The procedure is now performed with an acceptable mortality rate of < 4% in expert centers and and nevertheless 30% morbidity.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy: SMA first approach, peri-adventitial dissection Whipple procedure with mesenteric first approach is a technique described and validated in surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This technique, which involves dissecting the peri-adventitial tissues of the superior mesenteric artery, has been reported mainly in borderline or locally advanced tumors of the head of the pancreas, to control the artery and improve the quality of the resection. This technique allows exposure of the right hemicircumference of the artery and clearance of the origin of the celiac trunk before sectioning the key elements of the duodenopancreatectomy cephalic.
Six surgical approaches that can be considered as "artery first" have been reported by Sanjay et al. Two approaches to avoid technical biases in SMA dissection and arterial margins will be considered: the right posterior approach and the anterior approach.
Although PD is mature, the low R0 resection rate remains a major issue, and most patients will develop a local recurrence, as demonstrated by autopsy studies.
The investigators hypothesise that the SMA first approach (SMA-PD) improves R0 resection margins compared to the standard procedure (ST-PD) during PD in patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma."
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Daniel Pietrasz, Medical Doctor
- Phone Number: +33 45 49 66 92
- Email: daniel.pietrasz@aphp.fr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Antonhio Sa Cunha, MD PHD
- Phone Number: +33 1 45 59 39 13
- Email: antonio.sacunha@aphp.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Amiens, France
- CHU Amiens
-
Contact:
- Jean-Marc REGIMBEAU, MD PHD
- Email: regimbeau.jean-marc@chu-amiens.fr
-
Angers, France
- CHU Angers
-
Contact:
- Emilie LERMITE, MD PHD
- Email: emlermite@chu-angers.fr
-
Besançon, France
- CHU Besançon
-
Contact:
- Alexandre DOUSSOT, MD
- Email: adoussot@chu-besancon.fr
-
Bordeaux, France
- Hopital Haut Leveque
-
Contact:
- Christophe LAURENT, MD PHD
- Email: christophe.laurent@chu-bordeaux.fr
-
Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Hopital Estaing
-
Contact:
- Emmanuel BUC, Professor
- Email: ebuc@chu-clermontferrand.fr
-
Dijon, France
- Hôpital François Mitterrand
-
Contact:
- Jean-Baptiste Dr LEQUEU, Dr
- Email: jean-baptiste.lequeu@chu-dijon.fr
-
Lille, France
- Hopital Claude Huriez
-
Contact:
- Julie VEZIANT, MD
- Email: Julie.veziant@chu-lille.fr
-
Lille, France
- CHU Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez
-
Contact:
- Stéphanie TRUANT, MD PHD
- Email: stephanie.truant@chu-lille.fr
-
Limoges, France
- CHU Dupuytren 1
-
Contact:
- Abdelkader TAIBI, Dr
- Email: abdelkader.taibi@chu-limoges.fr
-
Lyon, France
- Centre Leon Berard
-
Contact:
- Aurélien DUPRE, MD PHD
- Email: aurelien.dupre@lyon.unicancer.fr
-
Lyon, France
- Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse
-
Contact:
- Jean-Yves MABRUT, MD PHD
- Email: jean-yves.mabrut@chu-lyon.fr
-
Montpellier, France
- Hopital Saint Eloi
-
Contact:
- François-Régis SOUCHE, Dr
- Email: Fr-souche@chu-montpellier.fr
-
Nancy, France
- Hopitaux de Brabois
-
Contact:
- Ahmet AYAV, MD PHD
- Email: a.ayav@chru-nancy.fr
-
Nantes, France
- CHU Nantes
-
Contact:
- Nicolas REGENET, MD PHD
- Email: nicolas.regenet@chu-nantes.fr
-
Paris, France
- Hopital de La Pitie Salpetriere
-
Contact:
- Gaujoux Sébastien, MD PHD
- Email: sebastien.gaujoux@aphp.fr
-
Paris, France
- Hopital Cochin
-
Contact:
- Ugo MARCHESE, MD
- Email: ugo.marchese@aphp.fr
-
Paris, France
- Hopital Beaujon
-
Contact:
- Alain SAUVANET, MD PHD
- Email: alain.sauvanet@aphp.fr
-
Paris, France
- Hôpital Ambroise Paré
-
Contact:
- Renato LUPINACI, MD PHD
- Email: renato.lupinacci@aphp.fr
-
Rouen, France
- Hôpital Charles-Nicolle
-
Contact:
- Lilian SCHWARZ, MD - PHD
- Email: lilian.schwarz@chu-rouen.fr
-
Strasbourg, France
- CHU Strasbourg
-
Contact:
- Pietro ADDEO, MD PHD
- Email: pietrofrancesco.addeo@chru-strasbourg.fr
-
Toulouse, France
- Hôpital Rangueil
-
Contact:
- Fabrice MUSCARI, MD PHD
- Email: muscari.f@chu-toulouse.fr
-
Villejuif, France
- Institut Gustave Roussy
-
Contact:
- Maximiliano GELLI, MD
- Email: maximiliano.gelli@gustaveroussy.fr
-
Villejuif, France
- Hopital Paul Brousse
-
Contact:
- Daniel Pietrasz, MD
- Phone Number: +33 1 45 49 66 92
- Email: daniel.pietrasz@aphp.fr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Primary resectable or borderline with isolated veinous contact pancreatic adenocarcinoma (according to the NCCN classification and international consensual definition of Isaji 2018): resectability is evaluated on arterial-phase and portal-phase IV contrast-enhanced multislice CT scan of the pancreas (slice thickness: 2.5 mm), and assessed in a multidisciplinary staff meeting including at least one radiologist and one expert surgeon.
- CT-scan of the thorax and abdomen confirming non-metastatic PAC at least 45 days before inclusion
- MRI of the liver without metastasis performed maximum one month before inclusion
- CA 19.9 (carbohydrate antigen) level ≤ 500 U/mL at the time of inclusion (in absence of cholestasis or biliary drainage)
- Age 18 or over
- Grade 0 or 1 Performans Status (ECOG)
- Normal renal and liver function at the time of inclusion (According to Cockroft and Gault's equation Glomerular Function Rate > 50ml/min/m2; Prothrombin Time > 70%)
- Absolute neutrophil count > 1,500/mm3, platelet count > 100,000/mm3, haemoglobin level > 10 g/dl (transfusions are authorized) at time of inclusion
- Adequate contraception on fertile women
- "Women of childbearing potential (defined as under 50 years of age and without a history of hysterectomy or tubal ligation) must not self-report being pregnant on the day of inclusion."
- Patient who provides a signed written informed consent form
- Patient having the rights to French social insurance
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pancreatic adenocarcinoma defined as "borderline" with arterial contact, locally advanced, non-resectable, or metastatic.
Surgical or anesthesiologic contra-indications:
Non-controlled congestive heart failure - non-treated angina - recent myocardial infarction (in the previous year) - non-controlled AHT (SBP >160 mm or DBP > 100 mm, despite optimal drug treatment), long QT
- Major non-controlled infection
- Major comorbidity that may preclude the surgery
- Severe liver failure
- Any medical, psychological, or social situation that (in the investigator's opinion) could limit (i) the patient's compliance with the protocol or (ii) the ability to obtain or interpret data
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women and women of childbearing age not using effective means of contraception
- Curatorship or guardianship or patient placed under judicial protection
- Participation in other interventional research type 1, clinical investigation or clinical trial during the study
Secondary exclusion criterion (during surgery):
- Evaluation of abdominal cavity, presenting infra-radiologic metastasis
- Positive tumoral invasion at frozen section after picking on the inter-aortic lymph nodes performed before any irrevocable organ section.
- Anasthaesiologic complication (induction allergy or unprevisible heart disease at induction)
- For fertile women: serological pregnancy test positive before surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Standard arm (ST-PD)
Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section.
|
Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Experimental arm (SMA-PD)
SMA-first pancreaticoduodenectomy using either right posterior or anterior approach.
SMA identified and isolated with peri-adventitial dissection before any irreversible section.
|
Before any irreversible gesture, the surgeon identifies and isolates the superior mesenteric artery and dissects nerve plexus and nodes on the right side up to the SMA origin (right posterior or anterior approach).
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
R0 resection rate (clear margin > 1 mm)
Time Frame: day of surgery
|
Proportion of randomized patients with R0 margins.
R0 defined as clear margin > 1 mm; R1 as ≤ 1 mm using standardized pathology protocol with central review.
|
day of surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: Up to 48 months after randomization
|
Disease-free survival will be evaluated using CT scans performed during follow-up
|
Up to 48 months after randomization
|
|
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: Up to 48 months after randomization
|
Death from any cause or last follow-up, whichever occurs first.
|
Up to 48 months after randomization
|
|
Operative Blood Loss
Time Frame: During surgery
|
Intraoperative blood loss measured in milliliters and perioperative transfusion requirements.
|
During surgery
|
|
Operative Time
Time Frame: During surgery
|
Duration of surgical procedure measured in minutes from incision to skin closure.
|
During surgery
|
|
Postoperative Complications
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after surgery
|
Postoperative complications assessed using Clavien-Dindo classification and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI).
|
Up to 3 months after surgery
|
|
Postoperative Morbidity
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after surgery
|
Morbidity will be assessed by comparing the percentage distribution of postoperative complications between the two groups
|
Up to 3 months after surgery
|
|
Health related quality of Life
Time Frame: At inclusion and 6 months after surgery
|
Quality of life will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Pancreatic Cancer Module 26 (QLQ-PAN26)
|
At inclusion and 6 months after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
- Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732.
- Ferlay J, Partensky C, Bray F. More deaths from pancreatic cancer than breast cancer in the EU by 2017. Acta Oncol. 2016 Sep-Oct;55(9-10):1158-1160. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1197419. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
- Hishinuma S, Ogata Y, Tomikawa M, Ozawa I, Hirabayashi K, Igarashi S. Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic cancer, based on autopsy findings. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Apr;10(4):511-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.09.016.
- Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, Behrman SW, Benson AB, Cardin DB, Chiorean EG, Chung V, Czito B, Del Chiaro M, Dillhoff M, Donahue TR, Dotan E, Ferrone CR, Fountzilas C, Hardacre J, Hawkins WG, Klute K, Ko AH, Kunstman JW, LoConte N, Lowy AM, Moravek C, Nakakura EK, Narang AK, Obando J, Polanco PM, Reddy S, Reyngold M, Scaife C, Shen J, Vollmer C, Wolff RA, Wolpin BM, Lynn B, George GV. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Apr 1;19(4):439-457. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0017.
- Esposito I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F, Reiser C, Herpel E, Friess H, Schirmacher P, Buchler MW. Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jun;15(6):1651-60. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9839-8. Epub 2008 Mar 20.
- Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014 Jun 1;74(11):2913-21. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155.
- Jiang X, Yu Z, Ma Z, Deng H, Ren W, Shi W, Jiao Z. Superior mesenteric artery first approach can improve the clinical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy: A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2020 Jan;73:14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
- Kim SY, Choi M, Hwang HK, Rho SY, Lee WJ, Kang CM. Intraoperative Transfusion is Independently Associated with a Worse Prognosis in Resected Pancreatic Cancer-a Retrospective Cohort Analysis. J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 4;9(3):689. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030689.
- Kneuertz PJ, Patel SH, Chu CK, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Delman KA, Staley CA 3rd, Kooby DA. Effects of perioperative red blood cell transfusion on disease recurrence and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 May;18(5):1327-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1476-3. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
- Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Margonis GA, Gupta R, Amini N, Frank SM, Pawlik TM. Impact of blood transfusions and transfusion practices on long-term outcome following hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 May;19(5):887-96. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2776-5. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
- Mavros MN, Xu L, Maqsood H, Gani F, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Al-Refaie WB, Frank SM, Pawlik TM. Perioperative Blood Transfusion and the Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22(13):4382-91. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4823-6. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
- Cameron JL, He J. Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;220(4):530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.031. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
- Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Giuliani T, Di Gioia A, Andrianello S, Zingaretti CC, Brentegani G, De Pastena M, Fontana M, Pea A, Paiella S, Malleo G, Tuveri M, Landoni L, Esposito A, Casetti L, Butturini G, Falconi M, Salvia R. Pancreatoduodenectomy at the Verona Pancreas Institute: the Evolution of Indications, Surgical Techniques, and Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis of 3000 Consecutive Cases. Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):1029-1038. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004753. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
- Amini N, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Pawlik TM. Trends in Hospital Volume and Failure to Rescue for Pancreatic Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Sep;19(9):1581-92. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2800-9. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
- Delpero JR, Bachellier P, Regenet N, Le Treut YP, Paye F, Carrere N, Sauvanet A, Autret A, Turrini O, Monges-Ranchin G, Boher JM. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a French multicentre prospective evaluation of resection margins in 150 evaluable specimens. HPB (Oxford). 2014 Jan;16(1):20-33. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12061. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
- Campbell F, Smith RA, Whelan P, Sutton R, Raraty M, Neoptolemos JP, Ghaneh P. Classification of R1 resections for pancreatic cancer: the prognostic relevance of tumour involvement within 1 mm of a resection margin. Histopathology. 2009 Sep;55(3):277-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03376.x.
- Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, McMahon MJ, Guillou PJ, Anthoney A. Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2006 Oct;93(10):1232-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5397.
- Verbeke CS. Resection margins and R1 rates in pancreatic cancer--are we there yet? Histopathology. 2008 Jun;52(7):787-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02935.x. Epub 2007 Dec 13.
- Pessaux P, Varma D, Arnaud JP. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: superior mesenteric artery first approach. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Apr;10(4):607-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.05.001. No abstract available.
- Whipple AO. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Islet Carcinoma : A Five-Year Follow-Up. Ann Surg. 1945 Jun;121(6):847-52. doi: 10.1097/00000658-194506000-00008. No abstract available.
- Groot VP, Rezaee N, Wu W, Cameron JL, Fishman EK, Hruban RH, Weiss MJ, Zheng L, Wolfgang CL, He J. Patterns, Timing, and Predictors of Recurrence Following Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2018 May;267(5):936-945. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002234.
- Neuzillet C, Tijeras-Raballand A, Bourget P, Cros J, Couvelard A, Sauvanet A, Vullierme MP, Tournigand C, Hammel P. State of the art and future directions of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Nov;155:80-104. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
- Khorana AA, McKernin SE, Berlin J, Hong TS, Maitra A, Moravek C, Mumber M, Schulick R, Zeh HJ, Katz MHG. Potentially Curable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 10;37(23):2082-2088. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00946. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- APHP220920
- 2024-A02711-46 (Other Identifier: ANSM)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
-
Revolution Medicines, Inc.RecruitingPancreatic Cancer | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic | Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) | PDAC | PDAC - Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma MetastaticUnited States
-
Revolution Medicines, Inc.RecruitingPancreatic Cancer | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic | Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) | PDAC | PDAC - Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma MetastaticUnited States
-
Revolution Medicines, Inc.AvailablePancreatic Cancer | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic | Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma | PDAC | PDAC - Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Metastatic | Metastatic Pancreas Adenocarcinoma
-
East Lancashire Hospitals NHS TrustNot yet recruitingPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (mPDAC)
-
PanTher TherapeuticsRecruitingPancreatic Cancer | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Borderline Resectable Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaUnited States
-
Immuneering CorporationRecruitingPancreatic Cancer | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) | PDAC | PDAC - Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma MetastaticUnited States
-
Fudan UniversityUnknownStage IA Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Stage IB Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIB Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaChina
-
OHSU Knight Cancer InstituteGenentech, Inc.; Oregon Health and Science University; American Association for... and other collaboratorsRecruitingStage II Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8 | Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Unresectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and other conditionsUnited States
-
British Columbia Cancer AgencyBC Cancer Foundation; Terry Fox Research InstituteRecruitingPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal AdenocarcinomaCanada
-
Revolution Medicines, Inc.RecruitingPancreatic Cancer | Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | PDAC | PDAC - Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)United States, Puerto Rico, United Kingdom