Nursing Fro Laparoscopic vs. Open Hepatectomy

June 30, 2018 updated by: Zeng Li, Wuhan Union Hospital, China

Comparison of Efficacy and Nursing Between Laparoscopic Hepatectomy and Open Hepatectomy for Primary Liver Cancer

This study was divided into laparoscopic hepatectomy (observation group) and laparoscopic hepatectomy (control group).Compared two groups of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), tumor diameter, number of tumors (single/multiple), pathologic characteristics, HBsAg (positive/negative), liver function, AFP, Child - Pugh, grading, nursing method and comparison of two groups of patients after surgery (surgical incision length, intraoperative blood, intraoperative blood transfusion and transfusion volume, operation time) the number of cases of and postoperative rehabilitation (death cases, for the first time the meal time, anus exhaust time, analgesic bed, first time, the abdominal cavity drainage tube time, length of hospital stay, postoperative days and liver function index.Follow-up: the survival rates of the two groups were compared in six months, one year, two years, three years and five years.In this study, the initial selection of the minimum sample size of 30 cases, plus 20% inefficiencies, the final initial selection of 36 cases, and the later expansion of the sample size of 100 cases.The research date starts on October 1, 2017.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Research design and methods:

This study was divided into laparoscopic hepatectomy (observation group) and laparoscopic hepatectomy (control group).Compared two groups of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), tumor diameter, number of tumors (single/multiple), pathologic characteristics, HBsAg (positive/negative), liver function, AFP, Child - Pugh, grading, nursing method and comparison of two groups of patients after surgery (surgical incision length, intraoperative blood, intraoperative blood transfusion and transfusion volume, operation time) the number of cases of and postoperative rehabilitation (death cases, for the first time the meal time, anus exhaust time, analgesic bed, first time, the abdominal cavity drainage tube time, length of hospital stay, postoperative days and liver function index.Follow-up: the survival rates of the two groups were compared in six months, one year, two years, three years and five years.In this study, the initial selection of the minimum sample size of 30 cases, plus 20% inefficiencies, the final initial selection of 36 cases, and the later expansion of the sample size of 100 cases.

Statistical methods: by means of SPSS 23.0 to analyze the data, all data after the normal test to choose the appropriate statistical methods, the normal distribution of measurement data in the two groups use surgery and postoperative recovery using two sets of samples t test, liver function index using analysis of variance, non-normal distribution using nonparametric test, count data chi-square test, P < 0.05 for the difference was statistically significant.Survival analysis was performed on two groups of patients.The research date starts on October 1, 2017.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Ye Lin
  • Phone Number: +86 13437145094

Study Locations

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 403322
        • Recruiting
        • Union Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

adult, aged (18- N/A),male/femal,diagnosised with primary hepatoma, received surgical intervention(laparoscopic and open)

Description

Inclusion criteria:

Hepatocellular carcinoma There was no distant metastasis in patients with malignant tumors. Exclusion criteria: primary tumor diameter > 10cm Thrombosis of portal or inferior vena cava carcinoma Severe organic disease or cirrhosis of the liver Laparoscopic transposition of the abdomen Concomitant coagulant function abnormal patient.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
laparoscopic hepatectomy
laparoscopic hepatectomy for primary liver cancer
laparoscopic hepatectomy: laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.
open hepatectomy
open hepatectomy for primary liver cancer
open hepatectomy: open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence of complications of primary liver cancer treated by laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy,The questionnaire survey
Time Frame: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were hospitalized together on October 1, 2017 were studied at the time point before discharge.
The incidence of complications, in percent
Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were hospitalized together on October 1, 2017 were studied at the time point before discharge.
The survival rate of primary liver cancer treated by laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy,Telephone pays a return visit
Time Frame: 1 month after discharge
Survival rate, percent
1 month after discharge
The survival rate of primary liver cancer treated by laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy,Telephone pays a return visit
Time Frame: 3 month after discharge
Survival rate, percent
3 month after discharge
The survival rate of primary liver cancer treated by laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy,Telephone pays a return visit
Time Frame: 6 month after discharge
Survival rate, percent
6 month after discharge
The survival rate of primary liver cancer treated by laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy,Telephone pays a return visit
Time Frame: 1 year after discharge
Survival rate, percent
1 year after discharge
The survival rate of primary liver cancer treated by laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy,Telephone pays a return visit
Time Frame: 2 year after discharge
Death and recurrence
2 year after discharge
The survival rate of primary liver cancer treated by laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy,Telephone pays a return visit
Time Frame: 3 year after discharge
Death and recurrence
3 year after discharge
The survival rate of primary liver cancer treated by laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy,Telephone pays a return visit
Time Frame: 5 year after discharge
Survival rate, percent
5 year after discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of oxygen uptake days between laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy for primary liver cancer, unit: day
Time Frame: Patients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.
Oxygen uptake days, per day
Patients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.
Comparison of ecg monitoring days between laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy for primary liver cancer Unit: day
Time Frame: Patients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.
Guardianship days, unit: days
Patients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.
Comparison of the number of replacement drainage bags for primary hepatocellular carcinoma between laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy, unit: number
Time Frame: Patients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.
Compare the number of times to replace the drainage bag, unit: number
Patients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.
Comparison of infusion days between laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy for primary liver cancer Unit: day
Time Frame: Patients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.
Infusion days, unit: days
Patients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.
Comparison of muscle injection times between laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy in primary liver cancer: times
Time Frame: Patients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.
Muscle injections,Unit: times
Patients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.
Comparison between laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy in primary hepatocellular carcinoma Unit: times
Time Frame: Patients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.
Number of subcutaneous injections Unit: times
Patients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Li Zeng, Department of Hepatobiliary,Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on lpaparoscopic hepatectomy

Subscribe