Effect of Two Toothpastes on Bacteria in Saliva

April 30, 2019 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

In-house Study to Determine the Effect of Two Zinc-containing Toothpaste Formulations on Viability of Bacteria in Saliva

This study investigated the ability of two zinc-containing toothpaste formulations (Zinc A and Zinc B) to reduce the level of bacteria in saliva in the two-hour period after their use, compared to the effect of rinsing with water alone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This was a single centre, three treatment, randomized, blinded, cross-over study which involved rinsing with slurries of two sodium fluoride-silica dentifrices containing zinc chloride and sodium citrate, and with water alone. The study consisted of four Visits: Visit 1 (Screening), Visit 2 (Treatment 1), Visit 3 (Treatment 2), Visit 4 (Treatment 3). There was a minimum two days wash out period before the first treatment visit and between treatment visits to avoid any treatment carry-over effect. During that time participants brushed as normal (twice-daily) at home with a washout toothpaste and a toothbrush which was provided at screening. Participants were required not to brush their teeth on the morning of the treatment visits and not to eat or drink for 2 hours prior to the treatment visits.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Weybridge, United Kingdom, KT13 0DE
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Personnel: GSKCH permanent and contract/contingency workers.
  • Consent: Demonstrated understanding of the study and was willing to participate and had received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form.
  • Compliance: Understood, was willing and able and complied with all study procedures and restrictions.
  • General Health: Good general health
  • Oral Health: Good oral health
  • Salivary Flow Rate: Had a salivary flow rate in the range of normal values (unstimulated whole saliva flow rate ≥ 0.2milliliter per minute (ml/min); stimulated whole saliva flow rate ≥ 0.8ml/min)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Study personnel: Members of the clinical study staff.
  • Pregnancy: Pregnant Women
  • Breast-feeding: Women who were breast-feeding.
  • Allergy/Intolerance: Had Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
  • Medication: a) Used an antimicrobial mouthwash within 48 hours of the test visit e.g. Listerine, Corsodyl etc. b) had taken, antibiotics within 2 weeks of the test visit.
  • Oral Surgery and Dental Conditions: a)Had an on-going dental treatment b) Had any oral surgery or extraction within 6 weeks of screening c) Symptoms of oral pain or any self-reported oral ulcers or herpetic lesions
  • Clinical Study Participation: a) Participation in a clinical study where they received an investigational drug within 2 weeks of the screening visit b) Previously participated in this study.
  • Substance Abstinence: Participant who were unwilling to abstain from smoking for at least 2 hours prior to treatment visits.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Zinc-A toothpaste
In this arm, participants received Zinc-A toothpaste (test product 1) in the form of slurry.
Participants received 6.0 grams (g) [± 0.3g] of the Zinc-A toothpaste in the form of slurry, one day per treatment (with at least 2 [generally 7] days between treatments. Participants emptied the contents of the dosing cup into their mouth, swilled the product around their mouth for 2 timed minutes then they expectorated into a sink.
EXPERIMENTAL: Zinc-B toothpaste
In this arm, participants received Zinc-B toothpaste (test product 2) in the form of slurry.
Participants received 6.0 grams (g) [± 0.3g] of the Zinc-B toothpaste in the form of slurry, one day per treatment (with at least 2 [generally 7] days between treatments. Participants emptied the contents of the dosing cup into their mouth, swilled the product around their mouth for 2 timed minutes then they expectorated into a sink.
OTHER: Mineral Water
In this arm, participants received mineral water.
Participants received 6.0g (±0.3g) of mineral water (by weighing out), one day per treatment (with at least 2 [generally 7] days between treatments). Participants emptied the contents of the dosing cup into their mouth, swilled the product around their mouth for 2 timed minutes then they expectorated into a sink.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Area Under the Curve Between 0 and 2 Hours (AUC [0-2] Hours) for Total Viable Counts (TVCs) of Bacteria in Saliva Using Traditional Plating Technique
Time Frame: Change from baseline in log10-transformed AUC 0-2hr
Area Under the Curve (AUC) between 0 and 2 hours (hr) was assessed using traditional plating technique which provides the total viable counts (TVCs) of anaerobic bacteria. This outcome measure is AUC of change from baseline in log TVC. AUC for each time-point were calculated individually for each participant for each treatment and were aggregated into an AUC measurement. The aggregated AUC measurement was calculated in the order that first the collected data is logged which is further analyzed by change in log. Then, AUC 0-2hr change in log was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. The resulted values were then divided by 2hr to take out time units and are logged to calculate bacteria count. Hence, the outcome measure calculates change from baseline in log10-transformed AUC 0-2hr over the range from pre-treatment time point (0hr) to the concentration at 120 minutes (min) i.e., 2hr.
Change from baseline in log10-transformed AUC 0-2hr

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in AUC (0-2) Hours for the Ratio of Live:Dead Bacteria Using Live-dead Staining Technique
Time Frame: Baseline up to 2 hours
Anaerobic bacteria were counted using live:dead staining technique. Change from baseline in AUC (0-2)hr was calculated for the ratio of live and dead bacteria. Viable bacterial counts for each time-point were calculated individually for each participant for each treatment and were aggregated into an AUC measurement. AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal rule and using nominal time points. The resulted values were then divided by 2hr to take out time units. The AUC was calculated over the range from pre-treatment time point (0hr) to 2hr. In this outcome measure, the change from baseline is calculated in log ratio of live: dead.
Baseline up to 2 hours
Change From Baseline in log10-transformed Total Viable Bacterial Count Using Traditional Bacterial Plating Technique
Time Frame: At Baseline, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours post-treatment
Anaerobic bacteria were counted using traditional plating technique. Total viable bacterial counts for each time-point was calculated individually for each participant for each treatment. Change from baseline in log 10 transformed total viable bacterial values was calculated.
At Baseline, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours post-treatment
Change From Baseline in Live:Dead Bacteria Ratio in Saliva Using Staining Technique
Time Frame: At Baseline, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours post-treatment
Anaerobic bacteria were counted using live:dead staining technique. Change from baseline was calculated for the ratio of live to dead bacteria.
At Baseline, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 4, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 27, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 27, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 202287

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oral Health

Clinical Trials on Zinc-A toothpaste

Subscribe