Pharmacogenomic Testing to Optimize Antidepressant Drug Therapy

July 1, 2020 updated by: John Papastergiou Pharmacy Ltd

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Pharmacogenomic Guided Versus Standard Pharmacist Care to Optimize Antidepressant Drug Therapy in a Community Pharmacy Setting

A randomized controlled trial comparing pharmacogenomic guided versus standard pharmacist care to optimize antidepressant drug therapy. This study evaluates the effectiveness of pharmacists utilizing pharmacogenomic testing in the community pharmacy setting to help patients find the most appropriate drug therapy option(s) and minimize the risk of side effects in collaboration with prescribing physicians.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Physicians and pharmacists have long been aware of subtle differences between patients in their responses to medications, but until recently did not have the tools to predict a patient's response to a drug before prescribing it. Many commonly prescribed medications are either ineffective or cause significant side effects for some patients. Individual variation in response to prescription drugs due to genetic factors (pharmacogenetics) is a substantial part of this serious clinical issue. Such variation in patient response ranges from failure to benefit from a drug, to adverse drug reactions, and drug-drug interactions when several drugs are taken at the same time. After years of uncertainty over the value of personalized medicine, recent studies show promising approaches for incorporating pharmacogenetics (PGx) data into routine patient care in order to reduce medication issues due to genetic factors.

Over the last decades, clinical PGx research has made significant progress in defining which genetic variations are important for influencing inter-patient variability in drug response. Evidence-based consensus therapeutic guidelines for multiple drug-gene pairs are available and promoted by the Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortium (CPIC). Although the primary focus of PGx testing has been on improving drug selection and dosing, a secondary benefit of testing is the improvement of medication adherence.

GeneYouIn has developed the Pillcheck® drug response test that provides personalized insights on a patient's predicted response to medications. To implement the Pillcheck test, GeneYouIn is working with pharmacists who are adept in understanding pharmacogenetic terminology and can consult with prescribing physicians and patients within current scope of practice. GeneYouIn will provide educational seminars on the latest advances in pharmacogenetics and using the Pillcheck report.

This demonstration project will provide critical education to clinical pharmacists to enable utilization of patients' pharmacogenetic data for evidence-base treatment optimization. The Pillcheck report has been carefully designed to make it easy to interpret and integrate in the clinical pharmacy setting. The study will provide insights on the impact of pharmacogenetics testing on solving Drug Therapy Problems.

The Pillcheck test assesses variations in 14 genes responsible for drug transport and metabolism for over 140 commonly prescribed medications. The Pillcheck report can enable pharmacists to effectively identify Drug Therapy Problems and advise physicians on personalized treatment options thus allowing for more rational medication choices and/or dosing.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

213

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4C 1H6
        • John Papastergiou Pharmacy Ltd - Store#500
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4J 1L2
        • John Papastergiou Pharmacy Ltd - Store#994

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Prescribed one or more antidepressants
  • Diagnosed with major depressive disorder and/or generalized anxiety disorder
  • Newly initiated on antidepressant therapy or a recent change in therapy and dissatisfied with therapy.
  • Experiencing adverse drug reaction(s) or suboptimal response or dissatisfaction with therapy
  • Demonstrated dissatisfaction based on a 9-item prescreening questionnaire. Scoring range from 0='not at all' to 4='very much'. If any scores for Q1-3 on side effects >2, or if any scores for Q4-6 on effectiveness <2, or if any scores for Q7-9 on overall opinion of therapy <2.

[Q1. Side effects interfere with my physical activity, Q2. Side effects interfere with my leisure activities, Q3. Side effects interfere with my daily activities, Q4. The medicine I am taking reduces my symptoms, Q5. I am satisfied with the time it takes for the medicine to start to have an effect, Q6. I feel better now than I did before starting the treatment, Q7.I intend to continue using this treatment, Q8. I feel happy with my treatment, Q9. In general, I feel satisfied with the treatment.]

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with poor command of English or who are unable to provide fully informed consent
  • Liver transplant patient (cheek swab won't detect liver DNA)
  • Non-adherent to prescribed drug therapy due to reasons outside of "not feeling better" (non-medical influencing factors)
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, dementia
  • Patients under 18 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intervention
Pharmacist optimizing antidepressant therapy using the patient's personalized pharmacogenomic report to make recommendations.
pharmacogenomic drug response test provides personalized insights on a patient's predicted response to medications based on metabolism
Other Names:
  • Pillcheck
  • Geneyouin
Placebo Comparator: Control
Pharmacist optimizing antidepressant therapy based on standard of care
Pharmacist providing standard of care as per usual practice

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) - general measure of satisfaction to drug therapy
Time Frame: Change of score from baseline to 6 months
This scale evaluates patient satisfaction of drug treatment for with any chronic disease. It's a brief, self-administer multidimensional generic questionnaire comprising 17 items. There are six categories of questions assessing satisfaction of (1) drug efficacy, (2) side-effects, (3) convenience of use, (4) medical care, (5) impact on activities of daily living and (6) general satisfaction. Scores of individual items range from 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much. A higher total score is an indication of greater satisfaction with drug therapy. Only scores from the side effects category would be summed as negative values. There is no recommended cutoff score, however is used to monitor the overall satisfaction to treatment over the period of the study.
Change of score from baseline to 6 months
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) - measure/monitor the severity of depression
Time Frame: Change of score from baseline to 6 months
PHQ-9 is a clinical evidence-based scale used to assess the severity of depression. There are nine diagnostic criteria for major depression based on the Diagnostic and Statistical 4th Ed. (DSM-IV) which are scored '0' (not at all), '1' (several days),'2' more than half the days, '3' (nearly every day). The nine items cover experience of pleasure, feeling down, sleep disruption, energy levels, appetite, feeling a failure, trouble concentrating, speaking slowly or being fidgety and having negative thoughts around suicide or self-harm over the previous 2 weeks. The total sum indicates depression severity: 0-4 none, 5-9 mild, 10-14 moderate, 15-19 moderately severe, 20-27 severe.
Change of score from baseline to 6 months
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) - measure/monitor the severity of anxiety
Time Frame: Change of score from baseline to 6 months
Evidence-based questionnaire used to monitor the severity of generalized anxiety. The GAD-7 score is calculated by assigning scores of '0' (not at all), '1' (several days),'2' more than half the days, '3' (nearly every day). Questions assess the tendency of feeling nervous, not being able to stop or control worrying, worrying too much about different things, trouble relaxing, being so restless that it's hard to sit still, becoming easily annoyed or irritable, feeling afraid as if something awful might happen. Total sums of 5, 10, and 15 represent mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively.
Change of score from baseline to 6 months
Sheehan Disability Scale - measure of functional impairment in work/school, social life, and family life
Time Frame: Change of score from baseline to 6 months
This scale assesses functional impairment using three 0 to 10 point visual analog scales. This can also be interpreted as percentages. Each of the three scales would have the patient represent how have their symptoms disrupted (1) work/school life, (2) social life, and (3) family life/responsibilities. The points from the 3 scales are summed as a global functional impairment score ranging from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). There is no recommended cutoff score, however is used to monitor the response to treatment over the period of the study. In general, a score of 5 or greater on any of the three scales is associated with significant functional impairment.
Change of score from baseline to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of pharmacist identified drug therapy problems
Time Frame: Analysis done at the completion of study (~1 year)
Total number of Drug Therapy Problems related to antidepressant use identified by the pharmacist include the following types (1) Dose too high/overuse/abuse, (2) Dose too low, (3) Unnecessary drug therapy/duplication, (4) Adverse drug reaction / drug interaction, (5) Requires additional drug therapy, (6) Non-adherence, (7) Inappropriate drug for indication
Analysis done at the completion of study (~1 year)
Prescriber acceptance rate of pharmacist's recommendations
Time Frame: Analysis done at the completion of study (~1 year)
Percentage of prescriber accepted pharmacist recommendations in the intervention group vs. control group
Analysis done at the completion of study (~1 year)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Papastergiou, B.Sc.Phm, University of Toronto
  • Study Director: Wilson Li, B.Sc.Phm, John Papastergiou Pharmacy Ltd

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 17, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Pharmacogenomic Testing

3
Subscribe