KPI-121 1% Versus Prednisolone for the Treatment of Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery in Children

September 21, 2020 updated by: Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Safety and Efficacy of KPI-121 1% Ophthalmic Suspension Versus Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic Suspension 1% for the Treatment of Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery in Children 0 to 3 Years of Age

This study is designed to assess how KPI-121 1% compares to prednisolone acetate in reducing inflammation after cataract surgery in young children. Approximately half the participants will receive KPI-121 1% eye drops and the other half will receive prednisolone acetate.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94303
        • Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
        • Children's Eye Care, PC
    • Pennsylvania
      • Erie, Pennsylvania, United States, 16501
        • Pediatric Ophthalmology of Erie, Inc.
    • Texas
      • The Woodlands, Texas, United States, 77380
        • Houston Eye Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 3 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be a candidate for routine, uncomplicated cataract surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a post-traumatic cataract.
  • Have suspected permanent low vision or blindness in the fellow non-study eye.
  • Have active uveitis in either eye.
  • Have an ocular neoplasm in either eye.
  • Have the presence of viral, bacterial, or fungal disease in either eye.
  • Have glaucoma, ocular hypertension, steroid-induced IOP (intraocular pressure) rise or elevated IOP

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: KPI-121 1% BID (twice daily)
eye drops
Active Comparator: Prednisolone acetate QID (four times daily)
eye drops
Other Names:
  • Pred Forte

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anterior Chamber Cell Grade
Time Frame: Day 15

Anterior chamber cell grading is a way of quantifying the amount of inflammation in inflammatory eye processes. Higher values indicate greater inflammation. The anterior chamber cell grading uses whole numbers from 0 (no cells) to 4 (> 30 cells) as follows:

Anterior chamber cell grade 0 = no cells seen Anterior chamber cell grade 1 = 1 - 5 cells Anterior chamber cell grade 2 = 6 - 15 cells Anterior chamber cell grade 4 = greater than 30 cells

Day 15

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Global Overall Assessment of Postoperative Inflammation
Time Frame: Day 15

The Modified Global Overall Assessment is a way of quantifying the amount of post operative healing that has occurred. Lower values indicate greater healing.The Modified Global Assessment grading uses whole numbers from 0 (clear) to 2 (not improving or worsening) as follows:

0 = clear

  1. = improving satisfactorily
  2. = not improving or worsening
Day 15

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 3, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 28, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 18, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ocular Inflammation

Clinical Trials on KPI-121 1%

3
Subscribe