Safety and Efficacy of KPI-121 in Subjects With DED (STRIDE 3)

March 9, 2021 updated by: Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

A Phase 3, Double-masked, Randomized, Controlled Study of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension Compared to Vehicle In Subjects With Dry Eye Disease (STRIDE 3)

The primary purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension compared to vehicle (placebo) in subjects who have a documented clinical diagnosis of dry eye disease. The product will be studied over 14 days, with 1-2 drops instilled in each eye four times daily (QID).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This is a Phase 3, multi-center, double-masked, randomized, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension versus vehicle in subjects with dry eye disease.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

901

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • Investigator #133
      • Dothan, Alabama, United States, 36301
        • Investigator #278
    • Arizona
      • Chandler, Arizona, United States, 85224
        • Investigator #146
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85032
        • Investigator #148
      • Prescott, Arizona, United States, 86301
        • Investigator #280
      • Sun City, Arizona, United States, 85351
        • Investigator #276
    • California
      • Azusa, California, United States, 91702
        • Investigator #185
      • Garden Grove, California, United States, 92843
        • Investigator #143
      • Glendale, California, United States, 91204
        • Investigator #147
      • Hemet, California, United States, 92545
        • Investigator #272
      • Inglewood, California, United States, 90301
        • Investigator #155
      • Long Beach, California, United States, 90805
        • Investigator #273
      • Mission Hills, California, United States, 91345
        • Investigator #130
      • Murrieta, California, United States, 92562
        • Investigator #247
      • Newport Beach, California, United States, 92663
        • Investigator #215
      • Rancho Cordova, California, United States, 95670
        • Site #111
      • Santa Ana, California, United States, 92705
        • Investigator #271
      • Torrance, California, United States, 90505
        • Investigator #107
      • Westminster, California, United States, 92683
        • Investigator #213
    • Colorado
      • Littleton, Colorado, United States, 80120
        • Investigator #218
    • Florida
      • Brooksville, Florida, United States, 34613
        • Investigator #184
      • Delray Beach, Florida, United States, 33484
        • Investigator #262
      • Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 33901
        • Investigator #279
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32256
        • Investigator #265
      • Largo, Florida, United States, 33773
        • Investigator #157
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33603
        • Investigator #189
    • Georgia
      • Morrow, Georgia, United States, 30260
        • Investigator #136
      • Roswell, Georgia, United States, 30076
        • Investigator #268
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60616
        • Investigator #266
      • Hoffman Estates, Illinois, United States, 60169
        • Investigator #187
      • Lake Villa, Illinois, United States, 60046
        • Investigator #151
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
        • Investigator #128
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46290
        • Investigator #250
      • New Albany, Indiana, United States, 47150
        • Investigator #125
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40517
        • Investigator #274
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40206
        • Investigator #195
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40220
        • Investigator #168
    • Massachusetts
      • Winchester, Massachusetts, United States, 01890
        • Investigator #219
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64133
        • Investigator #267
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63128
        • Investigator #123
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63131
        • Investigator #106
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63131
        • Investigator #126
      • Washington, Missouri, United States, 63090
        • Investigator #131
    • Nevada
      • Henderson, Nevada, United States, 89052
        • Investigator #281
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89123
        • Investigator #275
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89145
        • Investigator #263
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89148
        • Investigator #138
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10013
        • Investigator #105
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14618
        • Investigator #108
      • Wantagh, New York, United States, 11793
        • Investigator #132
    • North Carolina
      • Asheville, North Carolina, United States, 28803
        • Investigator #264
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27704
        • Investigator #217
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Investigator #149
      • High Point, North Carolina, United States, 27262
        • Investigator #102
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27603
        • Investigator #163
      • Southern Pines, North Carolina, United States, 28387
        • Investigator #282
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45242
        • Investigator #269
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45247
        • Investigator #142
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44115
        • Investigator #137
      • Mason, Ohio, United States, 45040
        • Investigator #171
    • Pennsylvania
      • Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania, United States, 16066
        • Investigator #224
      • Kingston, Pennsylvania, United States, 18704
        • Investigator #156
      • Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States, 17601
        • Investigator #200
      • West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, United States, 15122
        • Investigator #277
    • South Dakota
      • Rapid City, South Dakota, United States, 57701
        • Investigator #240
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38119
        • Investigator #127
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78681
        • Investigator #270
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
        • Investigator #188
      • Cedar Park, Texas, United States, 78613
        • Investigator #174
      • El Paso, Texas, United States, 79902
        • Investigator #140
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77055
        • Investigator #124
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77204
        • Investigator #259
      • Lakeway, Texas, United States, 78734
        • Investigator #175
      • League City, Texas, United States, 77573
        • Investigator #182
      • League City, Texas, United States, 77573
        • Investigator #191
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78209
        • Site #177
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Investigator #258
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78230
        • Investigator #186
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78240
        • Investigator #176
    • Utah
      • Layton, Utah, United States, 84041
        • Investigator #222
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23502
        • Investigator #119

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have a documented clinical diagnosis of dry eye disease in both eyes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to the investigational product(s) or components
  • History of glaucoma, IOP>21 mmHg at the screening or randomization visits, or being treated for glaucoma in either eye.
  • Diagnosis of: ongoing ocular infection; severe/serious ocular condition that in judgment of Investigator could confound study assessments or limit compliance; or have been exposed to an investigational drug within 30 days prior to screening.
  • In the opinion of the Investigator or study coordinator, be unwilling or unable to comply with study protocol or unable to successfully instill eye drops.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
KPI-121 Ophthalmic Suspension
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
Vehicle for KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Ocular Discomfort Severity at Visit 4 (Day 15)
Time Frame: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)
Comparison of mean ocular discomfort severity between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.
Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) Ocular Discomfort Severity at Visit 4 (Day 15) in the Subgroup of Participants With More Severe Ocular Discomfort
Time Frame: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)
Comparison of mean ocular discomfort severity between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse, in a sub-group of participants with more severe ocular discomfort at baseline.
Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Bulbar Conjunctival Hyperemia at Visit 4 (Day 15)
Time Frame: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)
Comparison of mean bulbar conjunctival hyperemia between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-4 grading scale. The grading scale was based on the Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit Grading Scale where 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)
Change in Conjunctival Hyperemia Scores at Visit 4 (Day 15) by Alternate Assessor
Time Frame: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)
Comparison of mean bulbar conjunctival hyperemia between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-4 grading scale. The grading scale was based on the Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit Grading Scale where 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Ocular Discomfort Severity at Visit 3 (Day 8)
Time Frame: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) to Visit 3 (Day 8)
Comparison of mean ocular discomfort severity between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.
Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) to Visit 3 (Day 8)
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score at Visit 4 (Day 15)
Time Frame: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) to Visit 4 (Day 15)
Comparison of mean corneal fluorescein staining between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using methods developed by the National Eye Institute (NEI) Dry Eye Workshop in evaluating 5 regions of the cornea (superior, inferior, nasal, temporal and central) using a 0-3 grading scale, where 0 = no visible staining, 1 = Mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe.
Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) to Visit 4 (Day 15)
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Ocular Discomfort Severity at Visit 4 (Day 15) Using 7 Day Mean
Time Frame: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) to Visit 4 (Day 15)
Comparison of mean ocular discomfort severity between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.
Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) to Visit 4 (Day 15)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 5, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 5, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kerato Conjunctivitis Sicca

Clinical Trials on KPI-121 Ophthalmic Suspension

3
Subscribe