Effect of Music on Reading Comprehension in Patients With Aphasia

January 2, 2020 updated by: Jacqueline Treichler, Carilion Clinic
The purpose of this investigation is to examine the evidence on emotion, language, and music, and propose a first step, in the form of a single-subject research design, to determine the most effective and efficient method for application to the rehabilitation of patients with aphasia. A single-subject adapted alternating treatment design will be used to compare two music conditions, using music with sung lyrics simultaneously with reading of the lyrics, and priming with music and sung lyrics followed by a reading of the lyrics, with a control condition using reading lyrics without music. Results are expected to provide evidence of independent versus shared processing of music and language at the phrase level applied to the behavior of human subjects with aphasia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Quality assurance plan that addresses data validation and registry procedures, including any plans for site monitoring and auditing.

Data checks to compare data entered into the registry against predefined rules for range or consistency with other data fields in the registry.

Data verification to assess the accuracy, completeness, or representativeness of data by comparing the data to external data sources (reliability) Data dictionary: detailed descriptions of each variable Standard Operating Procedures: patient recruitment, data collection, data management, data analysis, reporting for adverse events change management. Sample size: A minimum of four participants will be required to demonstrate replication of treatment effects. A maximum of ten participants will be requested to account for attrition.

Plan for missing data, data inconsistency,or out-of-range results. Statistical analysis plan describing the analytical principles and statistical techniques to be employed in order to address the primary and secondary objectives, as specified in the study protocol or plan.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Rocky Mount, Virginia, United States, 24151
        • Carilion Franklin Memorial Hospital, Carilion Community Memorial Hospital Inpatient Rehab, Carilion Day Rehab

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Post-hospitalization;

  • premorbid reading at the 8th grade level or higher based on the participant's/family's stated years of formal education;
  • post-stroke aphasia/left middle cerebral artery (MCA) cerebral vascular accident (CVA) based on electronic medical record (EMR) and computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging reports, or consult with the neurologist;
  • intact left amygdala and left extrastriate cortex based on EMR and CT/MRI imaging reports, or consult with the neurologist;
  • reliability in answering yes-no questions as determined by an 80% score on therapy tasks during regular speech therapy;
  • capacity to provide informed consent concerning a study involving an intervention with music therapy determined by the physician who refers the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Co-morbidities diagnosed and reported in the EMR or shown on CT scan or MRI including past history of stroke in other brain regions with residual symptoms, dementia, Parkinson disease, head injury, etc.;
  • hemianopsia or other visual field defects affecting vision for reading, and in particular right homonymous hemi- or inferior quadrantanopsia;
  • previous history of learning disabilities in reading/writing;
  • significant psychiatric diagnosis;
  • English as a Second Language or non-English language.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Music and reading lyrics
A single-subject adapted alternating treatment design will be used to compare two music conditions, using music with sung lyrics simultaneously with silent reading of the lyrics, and priming with music and sung lyrics followed by reading of the lyrics, with a control condition using reading materials without music.
listening to music with singing of the lyrics simultaneously with reading the written lyrics.
priming by listening to music and singing of the lyrics followed by reading the written lyrics.
control condition using reading materials without music.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent correct responses per day on phrase completion task.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Differential response to the interventions (counted as the percent correct responses per day).
through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Number of sessions required to achieve mastery.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Count number of sessions.
through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Retention of the reading material.
Time Frame: 3 weeks post-intervention.
Number of items recalled.
3 weeks post-intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) body Functions/Structures, Activities, and Participation.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Pretest-posttest information on the ICF Body Functions/Structures, Activities, and Participation (Hurkmans et al., 2011).
through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination-Third Edition (BDAE-3) (Goodglass, Harold, & Barresi, Austin: PRO-Ed.).
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year.
BDAE-3 pretest-posttest reading scores on subtests: Word Identification/Word-Picture Match and Lexical Decision; Homophone Matching; Derivational and Grammatical Morphology/Matching to spoken sample; Oral Reading/Basic oral word reading; Oral Reading of Sentences with Comprehension; and Reading Comprehension-Sentences and Paragraphs. Pretest will be completed prior to baseline and initiating intervention, and posttest with be completed immediately following completion of intervention to assess generalization to non-trained stimuli.
through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jacqueline A. Treichler, Carilion Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 18, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 17, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 17, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Share results without sharing protected health information or participant identification.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aphasia

  • Teachers College, Columbia University
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia Non Fluent | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction | Aphasia, Rehabilitation
    United States
  • University of California, Berkeley
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and... and other collaborators
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Non-fluent | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia Following Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    United States
  • University of South Carolina
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Completed
    Stroke | Aphasia | Stroke, Ischemic | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia, Global | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Jargon | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Primary Progressive Aphasia(PPA) | Logopenic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Progressive Aphasia in Alzheimer's Disease
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (svPPA) | Nonfluent Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (nfvPPA) | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia... and other conditions
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and...
    Active, not recruiting
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Enrolling by invitation
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia
    Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.; Universitat Pompeu Fabra
    Completed
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Wernicke | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Nonfluent
    Spain
  • Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital
    Not yet recruiting
    Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Post Stroke Aphasia | Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease
    India
  • Flint Rehabilitation Devices, LLC
    University of Texas
    Completed
    Broca Aphasia
    United States

Clinical Trials on Simultaneous music and reading lyrics

Subscribe