Prospective Study of the sensiTVT (sensiTVT)

January 17, 2024 updated by: Medical University of Graz

Prospective Study of the sensiTVT (Midurethral Sling) for the Surgical Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence

sensiTVT is a relatively new tape. The aim of this study is to analyze the objective and subjective outcome at one year follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is defined as the involuntary leakage during physical activity and situations that result in an increase of abdominal pressure like sneezing, coughing or laughing and affects up to 25% of women. Currently there are a number of tapes on the market with GYNECARE TVT EXACT® (Tension free Vaginal Tape) and TVT- Obturator being one of the tapes with the highest subjective and objective cure rates and relatively low adverse events in women with normal sphincter pressure. Due to the recent FDA announcements several tapes have been withdrawn from the market and several new ones have been designed. Data from other tapes are available, however data especially from newer tapes is lacking.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

197

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Graz, Austria, 8045
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Obstetrics, Medical University Graz
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Daniela Gold, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Karl Tamussino, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gerda Trutnovsky, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI)

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Planned surgery for verified predominant stress urinary incontinence
  • women between 18 and 80 years of age
  • good German language skills
  • informed consent

Exclusion criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Active surgical treatment for invasive malignant diseases within 3 months
  • Contraindications for surgery or anesthesia
  • Severe neurologic disease
  • Concomitant prolapse surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
objective success of stress urinary incontinence
Time Frame: one year
determined by a standardized cough stress test at 300 ml bladder, a negative cough stress test is a success.
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective success as determined using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire.
Time Frame: 3 months+ one year

defined as very much improved/much improved (1,2) on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale, while any other response (improved, same, worse, or much worse- 3-7) will be considered as failures.

The Patient Global Impression of Improvement is a seven item scale validated for incontinence.

3 months+ one year
Peri- and postoperative complications
Time Frame: 3 months+ one year
any surgical complications recorded
3 months+ one year
Subjective incontinence cure rate using the Incontinence Outcome Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months+ one year
The Incontinence Outcome Questionnaire was validated for postoperative assessment of quality of life after surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence and has 27 items with lower scores indicating worse treatment outcome. The total score is calculated.
3 months+ one year
quality of life using the Kings Health Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months+ one year
The Kings Health Questionnaire was validated in women with stress urinary incontinence and assesses the impact of incontinence on quality of life. The eight subscales ("domains") scored between 0 (best) and 100 (worst). The Symptom Severity scale is scored from 0 (best) to 30 (worst); lower scores indicate better QoL. Success in terms of the study is defined as 10 points improvement on the total Kings Health Questionnaire score.
3 months+ one year
Subjective bother using the Patient Global Impression of Severity
Time Frame: 3 months+ one year
Patient Global Impression of Severity The Patient Global Impression of Severity is a 7-item urinary symptom severity scale that is used to rate the severity of a specific condition -a single-state scale. The higher the number the worse the outcome of subjective bother of stress urinary incontinence.
3 months+ one year
Patient satisfaction measured using a visual analogue scale
Time Frame: 3 months+ one year
Patient satisfaction is defined as a score 8 to 10 on a 10-point visual analogue scale
3 months+ one year
Sexual health using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months+ one year
The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire is a 20 item questionnaire and is the primary measure used to assess sexual function in women with urinary incontinence and prolapse. Mean subscale scores are calculated by summing the valid responses to items in the subscale and then divided by the number of items with valid responses. The higher the subscores, the worse the outcome.
3 months+ one year
Erosion rate
Time Frame: 3 months+ one year
Erosion rate from the tape in the vagina or bladder
3 months+ one year
Reoperation rate
Time Frame: 3 months+ one year
Reoperation rate
3 months+ one year
De novo urgency
Time Frame: 3 months+ one year
De novo OAB- overactive bladder as determined by clinical history taking
3 months+ one year
De novo pain in the operated region
Time Frame: 3 months+ one year
De novo pain in the operated region as determined by clinical history taking
3 months+ one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniela Gold (prev. Ulrich), MD PhD, Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 8, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 2, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress Urinary Incontinence

3
Subscribe