Oximetry Guided Versus Traditional Rapid Deflation Technique for Achieving Hemostasis After Radial Procedures (ACCESS-III)

May 4, 2022 updated by: Christian Juhl Terkelsen, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

Randomised Comparison of Oximetry Guided Deflation Versus Traditional Rapid Deflation When Removing the TR-band After Radial Angiography or Angioplasty The Access-III Study

After performing a radial angiography/percutaneous coronary intervention (CAG/PCI), the sheath is removed and a compression device is used to achieve hemostasis. Recent studies have indicated that rapid deflation techniques resulting in early removal of the compression device is associated with a low incidence of radial artery occlusion (RAO).

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate whether an even faster removal of the compression device can be achieved if using oximetry guided rapid deflation compared to traditional rapid deflation, and whether this is associated with a lower incidence of RAO.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

3600 patients are randomized 1:1 to a traditional rapid deflation technique (Group A) versus an oximetry guided rapid deflation technique (Group B).

Before randomisation between the two deflation techniques French size of the sheath is chosen. If the operator has a preference for the size of the sheath then this size is used (5F/6F, estimated N=1200). If the operator has no preference for the size of the sheath then patients are randomized between 5 and 6 French sheath (N=2400).

Randomization between traditional rapid deflation technique (Group A) versus oximetry guided rapid deflation technique (Group B) is then stratified according to French size of the sheath used (5 French, 6 French). Terumo Glidesheath Slender is routinely used in both arms.

Assuming that the incidence of RAO (Barbeau type D, see below) can be reduced from 1.5% to 0.5% a total of 1547 patients are needed in each group if using an alfa=0.05 and beta 0.80. Assuming that the incidence of RAO or subocclusion (Barbeau type C or D, see below) can be reduced from 4% to 2% a total of 1141 patients are needed in each group to document this difference if using an alfa=0.05 and beta 0.80. The investigators plan to randomize 1800 in each group comparing oximetry guided rapid deflation with traditional rapid deflation. Assuming that the time from sheath removal to transradial-band (TR-band) removal (hemostasis) is 125 minutes with the traditional rapid deflation technique, and 110 minutes with the oximetry guided deflation technique, and the standard deviation is 60 minutes, then a total number of 253 patients are needed in each group to document a possible difference.

Data are analyzed by the intention-to-treat principle.

4-5 centres are expected to include patients.

Oral and written informed consent is collected at the ward or in the Cath.lab. The informed consent is signed before intervention.

Included patient can withdraw their assignment from the study at any time without consequence

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8200
        • Department of cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital in Skejby

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are scheduled for radial angiography or angioplasty.
  • Patients with normal flow in a.ulnaris before the procedure (Barbeau type A or B).
  • Age > 18 years.
  • Patients able to cooperate and understand information given by the hospital staff.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not able to give informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Traditional rapid deflation
Group A: At time of sheath removal 15 ml. air is inflated in the TR-band. The sheath is removed. Air is deflated until bleeding, and 1-2 ml. air is then re-inflated to achieve hemostasis, and the volume air inflated is registered ("Initial inflated air volume"). Every 20 minutes 1/3 of the initial inflated air volume is deflated. If bleeding occurs then air is re-inflated until hemostasis and then additional 1-2 ml. air is inflated. This routine is repeated until hemostasis is achieved (TR-band fully deflated without bleeding).
EXPERIMENTAL: Oximetry guided deflation
Group B: Initial step with sheath removal as in group A. Before departure from the cath.lab. a "Patent hemostasis test" (see description in "Interventions" below) is performed. Further action as described in "Interventions" below.
At the cath.lab. (Step 1) a hemostasis test is performed: oxymetry device on the thumb, compress a.ulnaris, evaluate if curve on device (="Patent hemostasis"). If patent no further action. If not patent, air is deflated until a.radialis is patent (curve on device and no bleeding). If bleeding occurs before patency then re-inflate 1-2 ml. air until hemostasis (="no patent hemostasis"). In patients with "Patent hemostasis" no action is taken in sixty minutes whereafter the TR-band is fully deflated (Step 2), and if bleeding then air is re-inflated until hemostasis and step 2 is repeated every 20 minutes until the TR-band is fully deflated with hemostasis. If "no patent hemostasis" at cath.lab. a hemostasis test is performed after 20 min. If "patent hemostasis" is achieved no action is taken in sixy minutes (as above). If still "not patent" then further action as in group A.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RAO (Reverse Barbeau type D) during index hospitalisation
Time Frame: Day 1 (Evaluated at time of TR-band removal)
The reverse Barbeau involves compression of the ulnar artery and evaluation of the radial oximetric waveform. This documents the flow through the radial artery post-hemostasis, were a test result A is an open artery and D is an occluded artery.
Day 1 (Evaluated at time of TR-band removal)
Time from sheath removal to removal of the TR-band
Time Frame: Day 1
The time period will be recorded in the cath. lab. and in the ward.
Day 1
Proportion who have the TR-band removed within 90,120 and 180 minutes
Time Frame: Day 1
Calculated with STATA, statistical software
Day 1
RAO (Reverse Barbeau type D) at follow-up
Time Frame: After 1 month
The reverse Barbeau involves compression of the ulnar artery and evaluation of the radial oximetric waveform. This documents the flow through the radial artery post-hemostasis, were a test result A is an open artery and D is an occluded artery.
After 1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RAO or subocclusion during index hospitalisation
Time Frame: Day 1 (Evaluated at time of TR-band removal)
Evaluated by reverse Barbeau Test (type C+D) were a test result A is an open artery and D is a occluded artery and hence B + C are a subocclusion.
Day 1 (Evaluated at time of TR-band removal)
Hematoma > 2.5 cm
Time Frame: Day 1 (Evaluated at time of discharge)
Development of hematoma is monitored at the ward at time of discharge.
Day 1 (Evaluated at time of discharge)
Time from sheath removal to discharge
Time Frame: Day 1
The discharge time is recorded in the patient file
Day 1
Discomfort in the arm
Time Frame: At 1 month and 3 months
The pain numeric rating scale (NRS), on which patients rate their current pain intensity from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain")
At 1 month and 3 months
RAO or subocclusion at follow-up
Time Frame: At 1 month
Evaluated by reverse Barbeau Test (type C+D) were a test result A is an open artery and D is a occluded artery and hence B + C are a subocclusion.
At 1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 16, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 10, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 10, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Radial Artery

Clinical Trials on Oximetry guided deflation

Subscribe