Valvular Aortic Stenosis Prognosis Study (EPRAoV)

February 9, 2023 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens

Valvular Aortic Stenosis Prognosis Study: Prospective and Retrospective Follow-up of a Cohort of Patients With Aortic Valve Narrowing

Aortic stenosis is the most common valvulopathy in Western countries. Cardiac EchoDoppler is the reference method for assessment of aortic stenosis and provides prognostic elements. However, it is imperfect with many inconsistencies between measures. On the other hand, the prognosis of patients with low flow and low gradient aortic retraction is discussed.

The main objective of this work is to study the prognosis of asymptomatic and symptomatic aortic retraction.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Aortic stenosis is an attack most often acquired from the aortic valve corresponding to a defect of opening of this valve. Its prevalence increases with age and approaches 2% at age 65 and 25% at age 85 . It is in the majority of cases degenerative due to the development of calcifications on the aortic sigmoid valves by a process close to atherosclerosis (Otto CM, Circulation, 1994). It is associated with cardiovascular risk factors (age, male sex, smoking, high blood pressure and associated high LDL cholesterol). Aortic stenosis may also frequently be the consequence of aortic bicuspid (congenital) or more rarely rheumatic fever.

Aortic stenosis is responsible for an obstacle to ejection of the left ventricle with increased afterload and thus left ventricular work. After a long asymptomatic period when the obstacle to ejection is compensated by the induction of an adaptive left ventricular hypertrophy, symptoms appear initially of effort (dyspnea, angina, lipothymia see syncope) then clinical signs of insufficiency heart. The occurrence of symptoms should cause aortic valve replacement because at this stage the prognosis becomes unfavorable with a risk of death by cardiac decompensation or sudden death.

The two pillars of the diagnosis of severity are the evaluation of functional aortic valve area and the average transvalvular gradient. The tight aortic stenosis is defined for a functional aortic area <1cm² or 0.6cm² / m² and a mean tranvular gradient> 40 mmHg.

Patient survival data and / or a possible complication or indication for surgery will be evaluated periodically either during a standard follow-up consultation if patients are followed in the referral center or by telephone contact with the attending physician or cardiologist. . In case of death, the cause and date will be collected.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Amiens, France, 80000
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Amiens-Picardie
        • Contact:
          • TRIBOUILLOY CHRISTOPHE

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The participants will be identified from the transthoracic echocardiography reports of the echocardiography laboratory of CHU Amiens and CH Saint Philibert for the retrospective part. They are prospectively identified during echocardiography performed in the echocardiography laboratory of the two participating centers when a diagnosis of aortic stenosis is made. Patients will be informed by newsletter.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Retrospectively, all patients examined from January 1, 2000 to November 2014 will be included in the echocardiography laboratory whose objective examination is a narrowing of the aortic valve (maximum transaortic velocity ≥2.5 m / s).
  • Aortic stenosis may be known in the past.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of the patient to participate in the study.
  • Patients who have previously had aortic valve surgery before being examined in the echocardiography laboratory.
  • Patients who can not be contacted or who do not respond will not be included in the database.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Aortic valve stenosis
The participants will be identified from the Transthoracic ultrasound echocardiography reports of the echocardiography laboratory of the University Hospital of Amiens and CH Philibert for the retrospective part. They are analyzed during echocardiography at the echocardiography laboratory of two participating centers when a diagnosis of aortic stenosis is made. Patients are informed by newsletter.
Patients are prospectively identified during echocardiography performed in the echocardiography laboratory of the two participating centers when a diagnosis of aortic stenosis is made.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prognosis of asymptomatic and symptomatic aortic valve stenosis
Time Frame: 6 years
Aortic valve stenosis (Rao) is the most common valvulopathy in Western countries. Cardiac EchoDoppler represents the reference method of evaluation of Rao and provides prognostic elements. However, it is imperfect with many inconsistencies between measures. On the other hand, the prognosis of patients with low-gradient and low-gradient Rao is discussed.) The main objective of this work is to study the prognosis of asymptomatic and symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. To Look for predictors of prognosis and To Evaluate the impact of comorbidities on the prognosis of RAo Evaluate operative indications and specify the short and long term outcome after surgery.
6 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Morality

Clinical Trials on Transthoracic ultrasound

3
Subscribe