Effects of Transcranial Focused Ultrasound on Human Primary Motor Cortex Using 7T fMRI

July 10, 2019 updated by: University of Minnesota
Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is a form of neuromodulation that uses a single element transducer to produce highly focused low-intensity acoustic energy that can be used to affect cortical excitability in humans. This technology has an advantage over existing electric and electromagnetic technologies in that it has very high spatial resolution and can be focused deep to the cortical surface to target sub-cortical neural structures and circuits. Previous research has shown that tFUS can affect human tactile detection thresholds (Legon et al. 2014a) as well as functional measures of the electroencephalogram (EEG) (Legon et al. 2014a; Mueller et al. 2014a). However, EEG does not provide for detailed spatial mappings and thus the specific spatial extent of the effect of acoustic energy in the cortex is not yet understood. This is an important consideration for the advancement of tFUS as a non-surgical method of stimulation of discrete cortical circuits and small sub-cortical neural structures. Is the effect of tFUS limited to its beam maxima? Does the effect extend along the beam path? And if so, to what extent? These questions can be answered if tFUS is combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background and Significance:

MRI provides highly detailed spatial maps of cortical and sub-cortical activation. As such, delivering tFUS in the MR scanner can provide critical information on neural activation as a result of tFUS. It is unclear however, if tFUS can generate a detectable blood-oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response. Preliminary evidence in humans (Mueller et al. 2014b; Legon et al. 2015) has demonstrated mostly negative results and highly variable responses perhaps due to the transducer or acoustic intensity levels used, the pulsing strategy employed and/or poor signal to noise ratios. We know from animal work it is possible to detect a change in BOLD response from tFUS if a known signal already exists. Yoo et al. (2011) showed focused ultrasound to attenuate the BOLD signal generated by visual stimuli in visual cortex of rabbits. Thus, it is reasonable to assume that this effect is transferable to humans as the underlying brain physiology producing the BOLD signal is the same.

Here we plan to investigate the effect of tFUS on the BOLD signal in human primary motor (M1). M1 has been chosen for two fundamental reasons. 1) The use of muscle contraction to generate a BOLD signal in M1 allows for investigation tFUS on the peripheral electromyogram (EMG) and 2) spatially specific BOLD responses in the cortex can be generated depending upon the musculature used, thus allowing for precise spatial mapping of effect. The first point is of significant interest because if a detectable effect is demonstrated on peripheral musculature it provides important initial evidence that tFUS operates on cortical motor neurons and descending motor tracts similar to electric and electromagnetic stimulation thus hinting at the cellular populations and mechanisms affected by and responsible for tFUS neuromodulatory effect. The second point confirms with high precision the spatially selective effect of tFUS and if we can establish energy/effect functions from this data, this can also lead to scaling of tFUS energies to elicit specific effects such as inhibition or excitation.

Together, this knowledge will further promote tFUS for cortical stimulation and progress tFUS for subcortical stimulation in humans. This last advancement is the great potential of tFUS. Imagine a small device that can simply be attached to the head for precise stimulation anywhere in the brain in lieu of surgery. This is the ultimate goal of this research, however, before this can be considered, the detailed data from this research proposal is necessary.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 to 65 years of age Provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of a current significant medical illness or psychiatric or central or peripheral neurologic disorder History of loss of consciousness of more than ten minutes in the past year or loss of consciousness in a lifetime that required rehabilitation services Personal or family history of seizure Any history of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) Taking any medications that may decrease the threshold for seizure Pregnancy Affirmative answers to one or more questions of the provided attached safety questionnaires. These are not absolute contraindications to this study but the risk/benefit ratio will be carefully balanced by the PI Failure to follow laboratory or study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: SINGLE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary motor cortex BOLD signal
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Primary motor cortex BOLD signal
30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 11, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 11, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1508M77355

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound in MRI

Clinical Trials on Focused Ultrasound

Subscribe