Promoting Resilience Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Sickle Cell Disease

April 30, 2026 updated by: Abby Rosenberg, Boston Children's Hospital
Adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) face challenges managing their illness and maintaining their well-being. This study proposes to test the feasibility and acceptability of a resilience-promoting intervention through a Collaborative Care Model. The primary goal is to determine with the resilience intervention (PRISM) is feasible and acceptable for adolescents and young adults with SCD. Exploratory outcomes include whether this intervention improves depression, anxiety, and pain interference.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) with blood disorders are at risk for poor physical, psychological, and social outcomes. Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is a life-limiting condition, defined as a group of inherited red blood cell disorders disproportionally affecting non-Hispanic Black, African American, and Hispanic/Latino groups. AYAs with SCD experience racial bias, disease-related stigma, and under-treated symptoms, all of which translate to additional challenges managing their illness and maintaining their well-being. This study proposes to address the gaps of mental health support for youth with SCD through delivery of a resilience-promoting intervention (PRISM) using a Collaborative Care Model (CoCM). The primary objective of this study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a collaborative care model to sustainably deliver the PRISM intervention for AYAs with SCD. Leveraging successful strategies implemented for patients with cancer, we will pilot-test this approach with N=25 AYAs in the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Boston Children's hospital (DFCI/BCH) SCD clinic. The primary outcome of interest is feasibility, defined as >50% enrollment. Secondary outcomes include patient reported outcomes of feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction. Exploratory outcomes include assessment of depression, anxiety, and pain interference. We hypothesize this will be feasible and acceptable in this patient population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Recruiting
        • Boston Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged ≥ 8 and ≤ 25 years of age at baseline
  • Diagnosed with Sickle Cell Disease (HbSS, HbSC, HbS-Beta Thalassemia, and other related hemoglobinopathies)
  • Receiving Medical Care at the DFCI/BCH Blood Disorders Center.
  • Scored > 9 on Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ-9) or Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)
  • Able to speak English or Spanish language (for PRISM sessions)
  • Able to read English or Spanish language (for completion of surveys)
  • Cognitively able to participate in PRISM sessions and complete written questionnaires and surveys, as judged by the site investigator
  • Willing and able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

* does not meet above criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CoCM+PRISM
Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) includes a care manager, a defined population of patents/registry for tracking inclusion and progress, validated patient-reported outcome measures, and weekly inter-professional team meetings. This arm includes the use of an inter professional team to triage, plan and deliver care. the PRISM intervention, a brief, skills-based program targeting 4 resilience resources, will be delivered 1:1 as part of this treatment arm.
The interprofessional team will meet weekly to review survey scores, endorsed psychological and physical health needs, as well as other concerns. They will conduct assessments as a group that may include referrals for additional support.
PRISM targets 4 resilience resources: stress management, goal-setting, cognitive reframing and meaning-making. It is delivered one-on-one by trained coaches in English or Spanish via HIPAA compliant video-conference or in-person. Sessions are delivered every 1-2 weeks based on patient preference. To facilitate practice between sessions, all participants 13 or older have access to the digital PRISM app.
Other Names:
  • PRISM

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Enrollment rate (feasibility)
Time Frame: 3-months
feasibility assessed by >50% enrollment rate
3-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability
Time Frame: 3-months post-enrollment
program usefulness and willingness to recommend it (assessed via qualitative interviews)
3-months post-enrollment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 3-months
depressive symptoms, range 0-27 with higher scores indicating higher symptoms
3-months
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)
Time Frame: 3-months
anxiety symptoms, range 0-21 with higher scores indicating higher symptoms
3-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 23, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

all deidentified IPD that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6-months after manuscript is published

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

contact PI

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sickle Cell Disease

Clinical Trials on Collaborative Care Model

Subscribe