PRISM for Depression and Anxiety in Young Adults With Cancer (PRISM)

April 20, 2026 updated by: Samantha Bento, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Treatment Development Study of the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) Intervention for Depression and Anxiety in Young Adults With Cancer

This research study is being done to test the feasibility of an existing supportive program (PRISM) to address psychological symptoms (i.e., depressive and anxiety symptoms) that young adult participants diagnosed with cancer or desmoid tumor may experience.

The name of the intervention used in this research study is:

-Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) Program

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This research study is being done to test the initial feasibility and acceptability of a six-session, skills-based resilience coaching intervention, Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM; Rosenberg et al., 2018; Rosenberg et al., 2021), that targets four resilience resources (stress management, goal setting, cognitive reframing, and meaning-making) for young adult patients (18-30 years old) with cancer or desmoid tumor who are treated with curative intent and who report moderate depressive and/or anxiety symptoms.

The research study procedures include screening for eligibility, completing one diagnostic assessment of depressive and anxiety symptoms, pre-intervention and post-intervention questionnaires, completion of the six-session PRISM intervention, and a semi-structured exit interview about the experience with the PRISM intervention.

Participation in this research study is expected to last approximately 2 to 3 months.

It is expected that up to 15 young adults with cancer (i.e., participants) and up to a total of 15 support persons (i.e., friends or family members who participants will have an option to invite for the final session of the intervention) will take part in this research study.

The Hans and Mavis Lopater Foundation is funding this research study by providing philanthropic support.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Brighton, Massachusetts, United States, 02135
        • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Participants:

  1. 18-39 years of age
  2. Speak and comprehend English sufficiently to be able to complete study procedures and participate in the program in English*
  3. Have been diagnosed with cancer or desmoid tumor at least 6 or more weeks ago
  4. Currently receiving treatment or has completed treatment for cancer or desmoid tumor no more than 6 months ago
  5. Score 10-24 (with question #9 not endorsed, or 0) on the PHQ-9 (Kroenke et al., 1999) or/and score 10-21 on the GAD-7 (Spitzer et al., 2006) during the initial screening assessment.

Participant Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults unable to consent, individuals who are not yet adults (age <18), pregnant women, and prisoners.
  2. Individuals who score less than 10 on both PHQ-9 and GAD-7.
  3. Individuals who are diagnosed with cancer less than 6 weeks at the time of screening (we will be able to approach them again after 6 weeks since diagnosis has passed), or those who completed treatment more than 6 months ago will also be ineligible for this study; they will be offered resources for support, if desired.

5) Individuals who report any suicidality (ideation, plan, and/or intent) on PHQ-9 screen (i.e., endorse anything more than 0 for question #9) at the time of the eligibility screening will also be excluded from the current study, and the appropriate safety measures and/or referral to a mental health provider will be made (see section 14.1 for more details on the procedure).

Inclusion Criteria for Support Person:

-≥ 18 years of age

-A friend or family member invited by the study participant to join the 6th PRISM session

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PRISM Program

Participants will be enrolled and will complete study procedures as follows:

  • Baseline visit with questionnaires.
  • 6 weekly or bi-weekly remote or in-clinic, psychotherapy sessions with psychologist.
  • Final questionnaires and post-study exit interview
Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM; Rosenberg et al., 2018; Rosenberg et al., 2021) is is an evidence-based skills-based resilience intervention. In the current study, PRISM sessions with be facilitated by a trained mental health provider to equip participants with skills for coping with anxiety, low mood, and adjustment to cancer diagnosis and to target four resilience resources (i.e., stress management, goal setting, cognitive reframing, and meaning-making). Sessions will be conducted by phone or Zoom, a HIPAA-compliant telemedicine platform. The optional mPRISM phone application includes 6 modules to practice PRISM skills and is available for iOS/Android.
Other Names:
  • PRISM Program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of PRISM Intervention Completion
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Feasibility is defined as 70% of PRISM sessions are completed by participants who start the study.
Up to 12 weeks
Rate of Study Assessment Completion
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Study feasibility is defined as 70% of all study assessments are completed by participants who complete PRISM sessions.
Up to 12 weeks
Participant Satisfaction
Time Frame: At final intervention session, up to 6 weeks
Acceptability of the PRISM intervention will be determined by responses on semi-structured exit interviews using descriptive statistics and scores on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire- (CSQ-8), an 8-item measuring a participant's opinions and assessment of the intervention. Total scores range from 8 to 32 with a higher number indicating greater satisfaction.
At final intervention session, up to 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mPRISM Phone Application Usage
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
The feasibility of the mPRISM phone application as a tool to practice PRISM skills, as evidenced by the participant usage metrics.
Up to 12 weeks
Questionnaires
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
The feasibility of using the assessment questionnaires in the current study (e.g., length, administration)
Up to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Samantha Bento, PhD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • Study Director: Greta J Khanna, PhD, MA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: [contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Contact the Belfer Office for Dana-Farber Innovations (BODFI) at innovation@dfci.harvard.edu

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Promoting Resilience in Stress Management Program

Subscribe