- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03649061
COBRA-Slim With or Without Fast Access to TNF Blockade for Remission Induction in Early RA (CareRA2020)
Effectiveness of a Combination of Methotrexate and a Step Down Glucocorticoid Regimen (COBRA-Slim) for Remission Induction in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), With or Without Fast Access to 24 Weeks of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Blockade in Insufficient Responders, a Randomized, Multicenter, Pragmatic Trial
In the Care in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CareRA) trial (NCT01172639) about 70% of early RA patients are in remission at the 2 year evaluation point independent of the combination scheme used.
Interesting to see is that the 30% of insufficient responders can be identified in an early stage of the treatment course.
The purpose of the present study is to investigate if, for patients with an insufficient response to a COBRA-Slim regimen, accelerated access to a short course of anti-TNF therapy already early after treatment initiation (from w8 until w32) could improve outcomes compared to a more traditional treat to target sequence.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Brussel, Belgium, 1000
- CHU Saint Pierre
-
Brussel, Belgium, 1000
- Cliniques Universitaire Saint Luc (UCL)
-
Brussel, Belgium, 1070
- Hôpital Erasme-ULB
-
Brussels, Belgium, 1090
- UZ Brussel
-
Liège, Belgium, 4000
- Chu Liege
-
-
Antwerpen
-
Bonheiden, Antwerpen, Belgium, 2820
- Imelda Ziekenhuis Bonheiden
-
Herentals, Antwerpen, Belgium, 2200
- AZ Herentals
-
Merksem, Antwerpen, Belgium, 2170
- ZNA Jan Palfijn
-
-
Henegouwen
-
Gilly, Henegouwen, Belgium, 6060
- GHdC Saint Joseph
-
-
Limburg
-
Genk, Limburg, Belgium, 3600
- Reuma centrum Genk
-
Genk, Limburg, Belgium, 3600
- Reuma Clinic Genk
-
Hasselt, Limburg, Belgium, 3500
- Reuma Instituut Hasselt
-
-
Namur
-
Yvoir, Namur, Belgium, 5530
- CHU UCL Namur asbl Site Godinne
-
-
Oost Vlaanderen
-
Aalst, Oost Vlaanderen, Belgium, 9300
- OLV Ziekenhuis Aalst
-
-
Vlaams Brabant
-
Leuven, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium, 3000
- UZ Leuven
-
Leuven, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium, 3000
- Regionaal Ziekenhuis Heilig Hart Leuven
-
Vilvoorde, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium, 1800
- AZ Jan Portaels
-
-
West Vlaanderen
-
Brugge, West Vlaanderen, Belgium, 8310
- AZ St Lucas Brugge
-
-
West-Vlaanderen
-
Brugge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium, 8000
- AZ Sint Jan Brugge
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years and older
- Diagnosis of RA as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/ European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 criteria for early RA
- Early RA defined by a diagnosis made ≤ 1 year ago.
- Use a reliable method of contraception for women of childbearing potential to be evaluated as in daily clinical practice
- Able and willing to give written informed consent and to participate in the study
- Understanding and able to write Dutch or French
Exclusion Criteria:
Previous treatment with:
- Methotrexate (MTX) or leflunomide
- cyclophosphamide, azathioprine or cyclosporine
- sulphasalazine (SSZ) for more than 3 weeks
- hydroxychloroquine for more than 6 weeks
- oral Glucocorticoids (GC) for more than 4 weeks within 4 months before screening
- oral GC at a daily dosage of more than 10 mg prednisone equivalent within 4 weeks before baseline
- oral GC at a daily dosage equal to or less than 10 mg prednisone equivalent within 2 weeks before baseline
- intra-articular GC within 4 weeks before BL
- an investigational drug for the treatment/prevention of RA
- History of chronic heart failure
- History of severe infections or chronic infection
- History of malignant neoplasm within 5 years
- Contra indications for GC
- Contra indications for TNF blocking agents
- Contra indications for MTX or leflunomide
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Underlying cardiac, pulmonary, metabolic, renal or gastrointestinal conditions, chronic or latent infectious diseases or immune deficiency which in the opinion of the investigator places the patient at an unacceptable risk for participation in the study
- Pregnancy, breastfeeding or no use of a reliable method of contraception for woman of childbearing potential (as in daily clinical practice)
- Alcohol or drug abuse
- Active tuberculosis (TB)
- Latent TB unless adequate prophylactic treatment is given according to local guidelines
- No access to the Belgian Health Insurance system-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: standard COBRA-Slim induction
Leflunomide 10mg PO daily added to the COBRA-Slim scheme (Methotrexate 15 mg PO weekly, Step down scheme of GC: 30-20-12,5-10-7,5-5 mg prednisone PO daily, each for 7 days except for the lowest dose of 5 mg, this will be maintained until w28 and then tapered to 2.5 mg daily for two weeks before stopping completely.)
|
Leflunomide 10mg PO daily added to the COBRA-Slim scheme
|
|
Experimental: COBRA-Slim Bio-induction
Etanercept 50mg subcutaneous (SC) weekly added for 24 weeks to COBRA-Slim scheme (Methotrexate 15 mg PO weekly, Step down scheme of GC: 30-20-12,5-10-7,5-5 mg prednisone PO daily, each for 7 days except for the lowest dose of 5 mg, this will be maintained until w28 and then tapered to 2.5 mg daily for two weeks before stopping completely.)
|
Etanercept 50mg subcutaneous (SC) weekly added for 24 weeks to COBRA-Slim scheme
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under Curve (AUC) of Disease Activity Score Based on a 28 Jointcount and C-reactive Protein (DAS28CRP)
Time Frame: baseline, w4, w8, w16, w24, w32, w40, w52, w64, w78, w92 and w104
|
Analysis was based on an intention to treat population, which focused on all patients randomized into the study, irrespective if they actually received the randomized treatment. Fifty-five patients were allocated to Standard COBRA-Slim and 55 to COBRA-Slim Bio-induction. This measure is an indication of the total disease-activity over time or long-term effectiveness, a higher area under the curve indicates a higher disease activity over time and so a lower effectiveness over the time frame of the trial. The scale range for the duration of the trial (104 weeks) is 0.0 to 977.6
|
baseline, w4, w8, w16, w24, w32, w40, w52, w64, w78, w92 and w104
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Insufficient Responders Achieving Remission (DAS28CRP<2.6) 28 Weeks After Randomization (Short Term Efficacy) to Either COBRA-Slim Bio-Induction or Standard COBRA-Slim Induction
Time Frame: From randomization till 28 weeks after randomization.
|
Short-time efficacy of disease activity based on a swollen and tender joint count of 28 joints and C-reactive proteine (scale range 0.0 to 9.4; remission: value below 2.6; low disease activity: from 2.6 till 3.2 (included); moderate disease activity: above 3.2 till 5.1; high disease activity: above 5.1).
|
From randomization till 28 weeks after randomization.
|
|
Proportion of Patients in Remission Defined as DAS28CRP<2.6
Time Frame: at week 104
|
Short-time efficacy of disease activity based on a swollen and tender joint count of 28 joints and C-reactive proteine (scale range 0.0 to 9.4; remission: value below 2.6; low disease activity: from 2.6 till 3.2 (included); moderate disease activity: above 3.2 till 5.1; high disease activity: above 5.1).
|
at week 104
|
|
Proportion of Patients Achieving a EULAR Response
Time Frame: at 28 weeks after randomization
|
proportion of patients achieving a EULAR response, based on actual disease activity on a tender/swollen joint count and C-reactive proteine (DAS28-CRP) 28 weeks after randomization and improvement in DAS28-CRP from baseline. The EULAR response criteria classify patients as good, moderate or non-responders, using the individual amount of change in the DAS28-CRP and the DAS28-CRP value (low, moderate, or high) reached according to the following tabel: DAS28-CRP at endpoint improvement in DAS28-CRP from baseline <=1,2 >0,6 and <= 1,2 <=0,6 <= 3,2 good moderate none >3,2 and <= 5,1 moderate moderate none >5,1 moderate none none Additionally all patients with a good response were also included in the number of participants with at least a moderate response. |
at 28 weeks after randomization
|
|
Proportion of Patients Achieving a EULAR Response
Time Frame: at week 104
|
proportion of patients achieving a EULAR response, based on actual disease activity on a tender/swollen joint count and C-reactive proteine (DAS28-CRP) at week 104 and improvement in DAS28-CRP from baseline. The EULAR response criteria classify patients as good, moderate or non-responders, using the individual amount of change in the DAS28-CRP and the DAS28-CRP value (low, moderate, or high) reached according to the following tabel: DAS28-CRP at endpoint improvement in DAS28-CRP from baseline <=1,2 >0,6 and <= 1,2 <=0,6 <= 3,2 good moderate none >3,2 and <= 5,1 moderate moderate none >5,1 moderate none none Additionally all patients with a good response were also included in the number of participants with at least a moderate response. |
at week 104
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Response
Time Frame: at 28 weeks after randomization
|
HAQ measures physical function as reported by the patient, total score range from 0-3 of which higher scores represent worse physical function.
|
at 28 weeks after randomization
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Response
Time Frame: at week 104
|
HAQ measures physical function as reported by the patient, total score range from 0-3 of which higher scores represent worse physical function.
|
at week 104
|
|
Radiographic Progression
Time Frame: at week 52
|
Radiographic progression at week 52 is scored according to the Sharp-Van der Heijde score (SvdH). The SvdH method scores the presence of erosions in 16 joints of hands and wrists (graded from 0 to 5), and in 6 joints of the feet (graded from 0 to 10), and the presence of joint space narrowing in 15 joints of the hands and wrists (graded from 0 to 4) and in 6 joints of the feet (graded from 0 to 4). The maximal range is 280 units for erosion and 168 units for joint space narrowing, summing up to 448 units for the total score. The progression is calculated by subtracting the total score at week 52 minus the total score at baseline (ranging from 0 to 448) Higher values in each (sub) scale represents a worse outcome. |
at week 52
|
|
Radiographic Progression
Time Frame: at week 104
|
Radiographic progression at week 104 is scored according to the Sharp-Van der Heijde score (SvdH). The SvdH method scores the presence of erosions in 16 joints of hands and wrists (graded from 0 to 5), and in 6 joints of the feet (graded from 0 to 10), and the presence of joint space narrowing in 15 joints of the hands and wrists (graded from 0 to 4) and in 6 joints of the feet (graded from 0 to 4). The maximal range is 280 units for erosion and 168 units for joint space narrowing, summing up to 448 units for the total score. The progression is calculated by subtracting the total score at week 104 minus the total score at baseline (ranging from 0 to 448) Higher values in each (sub) scale represents a worse outcome. |
at week 104
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Patrick Verschueren, MD, PhD, UZ Leuven
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Verschueren P, Esselens G, Westhovens R. Predictors of remission, normalized physical function, and changes in the working situation during follow-up of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2009 May-Jun;38(3):166-72. doi: 10.1080/03009740802484846.
- Verschueren P, De Cock D, Corluy L, Joos R, Langenaken C, Taelman V, Raeman F, Ravelingien I, Vandevyvere K, Lenaerts J, Geens E, Geusens P, Vanhoof J, Durnez A, Remans J, Vander Cruyssen B, Van Essche E, Sileghem A, De Brabanter G, Joly J, Meyfroidt S, Van der Elst K, Westhovens R. Methotrexate in combination with other DMARDs is not superior to methotrexate alone for remission induction with moderate-to-high-dose glucocorticoid bridging in early rheumatoid arthritis after 16 weeks of treatment: the CareRA trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jan;74(1):27-34. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205489. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
- Verschueren P, De Cock D, Corluy L, Joos R, Langenaken C, Taelman V, Raeman F, Ravelingien I, Vandevyvere K, Lenaerts J, Geens E, Geusens P, Vanhoof J, Durnez A, Remans J, Vander Cruyssen B, Van Essche E, Sileghem A, De Brabanter G, Joly J, Van der Elst K, Meyfroidt S, Westhovens R; CareRA study group. Patients lacking classical poor prognostic markers might also benefit from a step-down glucocorticoid bridging scheme in early rheumatoid arthritis: week 16 results from the randomized multicenter CareRA trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Apr 9;17(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0611-8.
- Verschueren P, De Cock D, Corluy L, Joos R, Langenaken C, Taelman V, Raeman F, Ravelingien I, Vandevyvere K, Lenaerts J, Geens E, Geusens P, Vanhoof J, Durnez A, Remans J, Vander Cruyssen B, Van Essche E, Sileghem A, De Brabanter G, Joly J, Meyfroidt S, Van der Elst K, Westhovens R. Effectiveness of methotrexate with step-down glucocorticoid remission induction (COBRA Slim) versus other intensive treatment strategies for early rheumatoid arthritis in a treat-to-target approach: 1-year results of CareRA, a randomised pragmatic open-label superiority trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Mar;76(3):511-520. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209212. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
- Van der Elst K, De Cock D, Vecoven E, Arat S, Meyfroidt S, Joly J, Moons P, Verschueren P, Westhovens R, CareRA Study Group. Are illness perception and coping style associated with the delay between symptom onset and the first general practitioner consultation in early rheumatoid arthritis management? An exploratory study within the CareRA trial. Scand J Rheumatol. 2016;45(3):171-8. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2015.1074278. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
- Verschueren P, Westhovens R. The use of glucocorticoids in early rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Aug 1;57(8):1316-1317. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex271. No abstract available.
- De Cock D, Van der Elst K, Meyfroidt S, Verschueren P, Westhovens R. The optimal combination therapy for the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;16(11):1615-25. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1056735. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
- Meyfroidt S, Van der Elst K, De Cock D, Joly J, Westhovens R, Hulscher M, Verschueren P. Patient experiences with intensive combination-treatment strategies with glucocorticoids for early rheumatoid arthritis. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Mar;98(3):384-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.011. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
- Meyfroidt S, van Hulst L, De Cock D, Van der Elst K, Joly J, Westhovens R, Hulscher M, Verschueren P. Factors influencing the prescription of intensive combination treatment strategies for early rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2014;43(4):265-72. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2013.863382. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
- Westhovens R, Verschueren P. Rheumatoid arthritis: defining remission in patients with RA in clinical practice. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012 Aug;8(8):445-7. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.111. Epub 2012 Jul 3. No abstract available.
- Verschueren P, Westhovens R. Optimal care for early RA patients: the challenge of translating scientific data into clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Jul;50(7):1194-200. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker131. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
- Durez P, Malghem J, Nzeusseu Toukap A, Depresseux G, Lauwerys BR, Westhovens R, Luyten FP, Corluy L, Houssiau FA, Verschueren P. Treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized magnetic resonance imaging study comparing the effects of methotrexate alone, methotrexate in combination with infliximab, and methotrexate in combination with intravenous pulse methylprednisolone. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec;56(12):3919-27. doi: 10.1002/art.23055.
- Boers M, Verhoeven AC, Markusse HM, van de Laar MA, Westhovens R, van Denderen JC, van Zeben D, Dijkmans BA, Peeters AJ, Jacobs P, van den Brink HR, Schouten HJ, van der Heijde DM, Boonen A, van der Linden S. Randomised comparison of combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate and sulphasalazine with sulphasalazine alone in early rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 1997 Aug 2;350(9074):309-18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01300-7.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Joint Diseases
- Rheumatic Diseases
- Connective Tissue Diseases
- Autoimmune Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Arthritis
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Immunologic Factors
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Gastrointestinal Agents
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antirheumatic Agents
- Sensory System Agents
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
- Analgesics
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
- Etanercept
- Leflunomide
Other Study ID Numbers
- KCE-16002
- 2017-004054-41 (EudraCT Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Arthritis, Rheumatoid
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCWithdrawnActive Rheumatoid Arthritis; Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Centocor, Inc.CompletedRheumatoid Arthritis, Juvenile
-
Yuanyuan ZhangRecruitingRheumatoid Arthritis (RA) | Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease | Difficult-to-Treat Rheumatoid ArthritisChina
-
AmgenTerminated
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)CompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid ArthritisUnited States
-
AmgenImmunex CorporationCompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Richard Burt, MDTerminated
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisSociete Francaise de RhumatologieRecruiting
-
University Hospital, ToulouseCompletedRheumatoId ArthritisFrance
-
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcEuropean CommissionCompletedRheumatoId ArthritisNetherlands, Germany, Portugal, Italy, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia
Clinical Trials on Leflunomide 10 milligram (MG)
-
Boehringer IngelheimCompleted
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedAlzheimer's DiseaseFrance, Spain, Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Sweden
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompleted
-
Mercy Bon Secours Saint Vincent Medical CenterRecruitingCannabinoid Hyperemesis SyndromeUnited States
-
Shanghai Children's HospitalCompletedAlport Syndrome, X-LinkedChina
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedAsthma | Healthy VolunteersUnited States
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompleted
-
EMD SeronoCompletedLupus Erythematosus, SystemicKorea, Republic of, Philippines, Spain, United States, Czechia, Germany, United Kingdom, South Africa, Poland, Argentina, Italy, Chile, Bulgaria, Japan, Brazil, Mexico, Peru, Russian Federation
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompleted
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandTerminated