Meditation Based Lifestyle Modification in Depression (MBLM-D)

July 25, 2022 updated by: Holger C. Bringmann, Diakonie Kliniken Zschadraß

Meditation Based Lifestyle Modification in Depression: a Randomized Controlled Trial

To evaluate effectiveness of a 8-week behavioral Mind-Body-Intervention based on Yoga and Meditation in depressive outpatients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

As a contribution to the field of Integral Medicine, Meditation Based Lifestyle Modification (MBLM) is a holistic therapy for patients with mental disorders. Influenced by Ayurveda and Yoga, it uses mantra meditation, ethical conduct and healthy life style to promote physical, mental and spiritual health. MBLM explains processes within the body and the mind and their relation to diet, exercise, biorhythms, social and personal conduct in an easy but profound way and on an experiential level. Besides providing tools for physical, mental and emotional self-regulation, MBLM lays ground for personal growth and transcendence of the mind. It is intended to be implemented in groups of patients as well as individual daily training, and because of its modular structure can be adjusted in intensity, duration and weighting of the components according to the specific needs and disorders to be addressed. This makes it also eligible for its potential use in prevention of mental disease and treatment of psychic comorbidities in patients with chronic somatic illness.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

81

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sachsen
      • Colditz, Sachsen, Germany, 04680
        • Diakoniekliniken Zschadraß

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects must meet the following criteria to be enrolled:

  1. Outpatients
  2. Written informed consent by patients who are competent to consent to study participation
  3. Diagnosis of current mild or moderate episode of depression diagnosed by a consultant psychiatrist
  4. Male or female ≥18 years of age
  5. BDI-II >= 10
  6. Patients must be physically able to perform simple Yoga postures and to sit silently for 20 minutes

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded for ANY ONE of the following reasons:

  1. Psychotic Symptoms
  2. Acute suicidal tendencies
  3. Compulsive disorders
  4. Cerebro-organic diseases with clinically relevant symptoms
  5. Severe multimorbidity
  6. Clinically relevant addictions (tobacco abuse or addiction is allowed)
  7. Current participation in another trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention

8 weeks Minimal treatment + MBLM 16 weeks Multimodal specific treatment + MBLM Consolidation

Definitions Minimal treatment: drug continuation under medical supervision Multimodal specific treatment: Drugs / Psychotherapy / Excercise therapy / Ergotherapy / Relaxation; excl. Yoga, Mantra, MBSR MBLM: 8-week course Meditation Based Lifestyle Modification MBLM-Consolidation: weekly Mantra-Meditation, monthly Life-Ethics

8 weekly modules, each 3.5 hours of Life ethics, Yoga exercises and Mantra Meditation
Active Comparator: Control I

8 weeks Minimal treatment 16 weeks Multimodal specific treatment

Definitions Minimal treatment: drug continuation under medical supervision Multimodal specific treatment: Drugs / Psychotherapy / Excercise therapy / Ergotherapy / Relaxation; excl. Yoga, Mantra, MBSR MBLM: 8-week course Meditation Based Lifestyle Modification MBLM-Consolidation: weekly Mantra-Meditation, monthly Life-Ethics

Drug continuation under medical supervision
Drugs / Psychotherapy / Excercise therapy / Ergotherapy / Relaxation; excl. Yoga, Mantra, MBSR
Active Comparator: Control 2

Definitions 24 weeks Multimodal specific treatment

Minimal treatment: drug continuation under medical supervision Multimodal specific treatment: Drugs / Psychotherapy / Excercise therapy / Ergotherapy / Relaxation; excl. Yoga, Mantra, MBSR MBLM: 8-week course Meditation Based Lifestyle Modification MBLM-Consolidation: weekly Mantra-Meditation, monthly Life-Ethics

Drugs / Psychotherapy / Excercise therapy / Ergotherapy / Relaxation; excl. Yoga, Mantra, MBSR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Beck Depression Index BDI-II
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks. Follow-up 24 weeks
Change of depressive Symptoms
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks. Follow-up 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
The FMI (14 item version; FMI-14) is a widely used instrument that assesses trait mindfulness that has been validated in a number of studies. This short form of the originally 30-items questionnaire provides robust and psychometrically stable (alpha = .86) properties. It is semantically independent from a Buddhist or meditation context (Walach, Buchheld, Buttenmüller, Kleinknecht, & Schmidt, 2006).
Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
The MAAS (K. W. Brown & Ryan, 2003) is a 15-item scale designed to assess a core characteristic of dispositional mindfulness, namely, open or receptive awareness of and attention to what is taking place in the present. The scale shows strong psychometric properties and has been validated with college, community, and cancer patient samples. Correlational, quasi-experimental, and laboratory studies have shown that the MAAS taps a unique quality of consciousness that is related to, and predictive of, a variety of self-regulation and well-being constructs.
Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
The Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983) is the most widely used psychological instrument for measuring the perception of stress. It is a measure of the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful. Items were designed to tap how unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded respondents find their lives. The scale also includes a number of direct queries about current levels of experienced stress.
Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
Brief Symptom Checklist (BSI-18)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
The BSI-18 (Franke et al., 2017) contains the three six-item scales somatization, depression, and anxiety as well as the Global Severity Index (GSI), including all 18 items. The BSI-18 is the latest and shortest of the multidimensional versions of the commonly used Symptom-Checklist 90-R.
Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
Aachen Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (Aachener Selbstwirksamkeitsfragebogen, [ASF])
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
The ASF assesses generalized self-efficacy as well as specific factors such as achievement, social interaction and body- related self esteem. Its internal consistency (Chronbach's α) is 0.90 for the general scale, and 0.74-0.84 for its subscales. The test-retest reliability for the ASF is rtt 0.66 over a period of eight weeks (Flatten, Wälte, & Perlitz, 2008).
Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
SpREUK-P-SF17
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
This instrument (Bussing, Reiser, Michalsen, & Baumann, 2012) was designed to measure the engagement frequencies of a large spectrum of organized and private religious, spiritual, existential and philosophical practices. It avoids the intermix of cognitive / emotional attitudes and convictions on the one hand with the engagement in forms of practice (action, behaviour) on the other. To account for the fact of institutional religiosity declines not only in Europe, and the alternative use of various existing esoteric and religious resources, the instrument differentiates both the frequency of conventional forms of spirituality/religiosity, and also more reflecting or philosophical practice and nature/environment- oriented practices.
Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
Triguna Scale (TGS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
TGS is an instrument to rate a variety of psychosocial traits (e.g. cognition, motivation, social behavior etc.) according to tri-guna model of Yoga philosophy (M. Puta, 2016; Maika Puta & Sedlmeier, 2014). The reliability of the majority of the 27 scales corresponds to reliability values of established personality inventories: Cronbach's α of 24 subscales is above .7. The internal consistencies of the other three subscales don't meet this standard, but their values are still above .6. Measures determining the validity of the inventory are very good. The exploratory factor analysis of the second study shows that all scales consist of three factors, each of which can be related to one of the gunas.
Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
Transgression-Related Interpersonal Motivations Inventory (TRIM)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
The TRIM is a self-report instrument that assesses the motivations assumed to underlie forgiving: Avoidance and Revenge. Responses to 12 statements referring to a transgression recipient's current thoughts and feelings about the transgressor are scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Recently, a six-item subscale to reflect benevolent motivations toward the transgressor has been under development (contact the first author for details). The TRIM subscales not only correlate with a variety of relationship, offense, and social-cognitive variables, they have also demonstrated strong relationships to a single-item measure of forgiveness. The inventory takes approximately 5 minutes to complete (McCullough et al., 1998).
Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
Brief global measure of client satisfaction (ZUF-8)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
ZUF-8 is a global, one-dimensional patient satisfaction measurement tool. It is the German-language adaptation of the American CSQ-8 by Attkisson & Zwick (1982). Over eight items, the general satisfaction with aspects of the clinic or the received treatment is recorded. ZUF-8 is particularly suitable for economical screening of patient satisfaction (Schmidt, Lamprecht, & Wittmann, 1989).
Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
The PTQ (Ehring et al., 2011) is a 15-item questionnaire assessing the tendency to engage in repetitive negative thinking independent of a disorder-specific content. Items are rated on a scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). The PTQ consists of three subscales: Core features of repetitive negative thinking (sample item: 'The same thoughts keep going through my mind again and again'.), perceived unproductiveness of repetitive negative thinking (sample item: 'I keep asking myself questions without finding an answer'.), and repetitive negative thinking capturing mental capacity (sample item: 'My thoughts prevent me from focusing on other things'.). Confirmatory factor analysis provides support for a 3-factor solution.
Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
Duke University Religion Index (DUREL)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL) is a five-item measure of religious involvement, and was developed for use in large cross-sectional and longitudinal observational studies. The instrument assesses the three major dimensions of religiosity that were identified during a consensus meeting sponsored by the National Institute on Aging. Those three dimensions are organizational religious activity, non-organizational religious activity, and intrinsic religiosity (or subjective religiosity). The DUREL measures each of these dimensions by a separate "subscale", and correlations with health outcomes should be analyzed by subscale in separate models.
Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
Aspects of Spirituality (ASP)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
The ASP questionnaire was developed to measure a wide variety of vital aspects of spirituality beyond conventional conceptual boundaries in secular societies. Both expert representatives of various spiritual orientations and also atheists were asked which aspects of spirituality are relevant to them (Büssing, 2006). Identified motifs we condensed to 40 items of the Aspects of Spirituality (ASP 1.0) questionnaire (7 factors; Cronbach ́s alpha = .94) (Büssing et al., 2007) which differentiates and quantifies cognitive, emotional, intentional and action-oriented matters of theism/belief, (esoteric) transcendence, existentialism, humanism etc. The reliable and valid instrument is suited to be used in health care research (Büssing et al. 2007).
Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
Spirituality as a Resource to Rely on in Chronic Illness (SpREUK-15)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
The SpREUK was developed to investigate whether or not patients with chronic diseases living in secular societies rely on spirituality as a resource to cope with illness. The SpREUK questionnaire relies on essential motifs found in counseling interviews with chronic disease patients (i.e., having trust/faith; search for a transcendent source to rely on; reflection of life and subsequent change of life and behavior). The instrument is suited to be used in health care research (A Büssing, Ostermann, & Matthiessen, 2005).
Baseline, 8 weeks; Follow-up 24 weeks
Assessment of training and exercise hours
Time Frame: Daily for 8 weeks in intervention group
Patients receive weekly working sheets to document daily, cumulative duration of practice.
Daily for 8 weeks in intervention group
Heart Rate Variability
Time Frame: 24h continuous measurement at Baseline, and at 8 weeks
Faros eMotion 180 derived 3-lead ECG Heart Rate Variability (RR-Intervals in ms)
24h continuous measurement at Baseline, and at 8 weeks
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks continuously in 1-minute intervals
FitBit Charge 2 derived Heart Rate (beats per minute)
8 weeks continuously in 1-minute intervals
Sleep duration
Time Frame: 8 weeks continuously
FitBit Charge 2 derived sleep duration in minutes
8 weeks continuously
Activity: Steps per day
Time Frame: 8 weeks continuously
FitBit Charge 2 derived steps per day
8 weeks continuously
Qualitative Interview
Time Frame: After 8 or 24 weeks

A single qualitative interview with selected patients (around 10 patients in each group) will be held after at least 8 weeks of treatment to assess qualitative data:

Interviews will involve the following domains of exploration

  1. How has the treatment you have received during the last weeks has affected your depression?
  2. How did you experience the treatment?
  3. What does spirituality mean to you and how has that changed during the treatment?

Interviews are an optional part of the study in terms of a mixed model approach to receive quantitative and qualitative data as well. Participants willing to be interviewed have to sign an additional consent for the collection and processing of personal interview data.

After 8 or 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 27, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MBLM-D

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Meditation Based Lifestyle Modification

3
Subscribe