- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03663985
FALCOn (Facteur AnthropoLogique Cancer Orl) (FALCOn)
FALCOn (Facteur AnthropoLogique Cancer Orl) Evaluation Des Facteurs Anthropologiques, Socio-culturels et Psychologiques Des Praticiens Qui Conditionnent la Prise de décision Pour Les Patients Atteints de Cancer Des VADS
There are no studies on practitioner-related factors influencing decision-making in the field of carcinology of aerodigestive carcinomas. The objective of the study is to determine what are the anthropo-sociological factors in the surgeon, the oncologists and radiotherapists influencing decision making in ear, nose, and throat carcinology. Special attention will be paid to the practitioner's gender, age, geographical origin, place and institution of training, place of practice, volume of patients treated, access to or without reconstruction by microsurgery, his tendency or aversion to risk taking.
Main objectives : To determine the individual professional and non-professional characteristics influencing physicians' decision-making in oncology of aerodigestive carcinomas between choices:
- Surgery
- Radio and / or chemotherapy
- Support care
- Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and reassessment
- Secondary objectives : Identify if certain patient profiles may lead to heterogeneous treatment decisions i.e. Human Papillomavirus status, age, comorbidities, autonomy, etc.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Actually, there are no studies on practitioner-related factors influencing decision-making in the field of carcinology of aerodigestive carcinomas.
The objective of the study is to determine what are the anthropo-sociological factors in the surgeon, the oncologists and radiotherapists influencing decision making in ear, nose, and throat carcinology.
Special attention will be paid to the practitioner's gender, age, geographical origin, place and institution of training, place of practice, volume of patients treated, access to or without reconstruction by microsurgery, his tendency or aversion to risk taking.
This questionnaire will include the items age, sex, place and date of obtaining a medical degree, whether or not obtaining the specialization in cancer, profession of surgeon / oncologist / radiotherapist, place of practice with type of institution (University hospital, Private clinic, etc.) volume of patients treated per year, access or not to reconstructions by microsurgery. The answers to the questionnaire will be anonymous.
Practitioners' attitudes towards risk and uncertainty will be evaluated by 4 validated tools in behavioral science:
- Self-assessment of attitude towards risk in different areas (Likert scale)
- Monetary choice when earnings probabilities are known (attitude to risk)
- Monetary choice when earnings probabilities are not known (attitude towards uncertainty)
- Experience of Allais Seven clinical cases will serve as a basis for the creation of clinical vignettes.
A standard case will be part of these vignettes allowing a validation on the respect of the guidelines. The other 6 clinical cases will be cleavants and 36 vignettes will be created by crossing the 6 previous clinical cases with 6 different patient profiles on their social and demographic characteristics (age, comorbidity, sex, isolation)
The experimental plan will take the form of a Latin Square to propose (in addition to the standard case), 6 vignettes to each practitioner by ensuring that all the factors will be presented in a balanced and random way.
In a first phase, the online questionnaire including the vignettes will be evaluated within the sponsor center and by two ear, nose, and throat surgeons from two other centers who have agreed to participate in the project in order to verify its feasibility before global sending.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Occitanie
-
Toulouse, Occitanie, France, 31059
- Institut Claudius Regaud
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- ADULT
- OLDER_ADULT
- CHILD
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ear, nose and throat surgeons, oncologists specializing in oncology of aerodigestive carcinomas, radiation therapists specialized in oncology of aerodigestive carcinomas exercising in France
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Evaluation of the anthropological, socio-cultural and psychological factors of the practitioners which condition the decision making for the patients with aero-digestive carcinomas.
Time Frame: 2018, September to December
|
An analysis using a classification method will define a typology of therapeutic choices given their aggression and potential risk. These typologies of prescriptions will then be confronted with the characteristics of physicians in terms of propensity for risk taking and their socio-demographic characteristics using a chi2 test (univariate) and a logistic regression (or polynomial if a binary typology cannot be released (multivariate). Variability of choice and influence of physician characteristics on these choices will also be analyzed based on patient characteristics Expected results :
|
2018, September to December
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Determination of clinical recommendations choices of the health practitioners for different clinical cases of aerodigestive carcinomas
Time Frame: 2018, September to December
|
7 clinical cases will serve as a basis for the creation of clinical vignettes: A standard case (T2N1M0 pelvi-lingual carcinoma, good general condition patient) will be part of these vignettes allowing a validation on the respect of the guidelines.The other 6 clinical cases will be cleavants. The experimental plan will take the form of a Latin Square to propose (in addition to the standard case), 6 vignettes to each practitioner by ensuring that all the factors will be presented in a balanced and random way. Practitioners will be asked to give their clinical recommendations for each clinical case presented. |
2018, September to December
|
Self assessment of willingness to take risk (by health practitioners themselves)
Time Frame: 2018, September to December
|
All the health practitioners will be asked to self-evaluate their propensity to take risk using a 11-point Likert scale ranging from "not at all willing to take risks" to "fully prepared to take risks" in 4 different domains including their daily life, their personal finances, their patient's health and their own health.
The Likert scale used in this test is a 0-10 scale where 0 means "not at all willing to take risks" and 10 means "fully prepared to take risks"
|
2018, September to December
|
Evaluation of health practitioners' risk attitude
Time Frame: 2018, September to December
|
Individual attitudes toward risk will be obtained through certainty equivalent elicitation of a lottery.
Using a scrollbar, respondents will be asked to provide the amount of money that makes them indifferent between gaining it for sure or playing the lottery giving them 500 euros with half a chance and nothing otherwise.
The expected gain of this lottery is 250 euros, so when the elicited certainty equivalent is inferior (equal/superior) to 250 euros, the respondent is considered as risk averse (neutral/seeking).
|
2018, September to December
|
Evaluation of health practitioners' uncertainty attitude
Time Frame: 2018, September to December
|
Individual attitudes towards uncertainty will be obtained through certainty equivalent elicitation of a lottery where the probability of gain is unknown.
Using the same scrollbar, respondents will be asked to provide the amount of money that makes them indifferent between gaining it for sure or playing the lottery giving them 500 euros with an unknown probability and nothing with an unknown probability.
|
2018, September to December
|
Evaluation of health practitioners' rationality attitude
Time Frame: 2018, September to December
|
Individual rationality attitudes will be obtained through an Allais test. The expected utility theory is an axiomatic model of decision under uncertainty and is often considered as a normative model of rationality. Allais and Kahneman and Tversky proposed a set of two binary choices that allow to test the independence axiom of the expected utility theory under risk and therefore the adequacy of an individual to the model. The Allais task will be assessed with this 2 questions: Choice 1: Which option do you prefer?
|
2018, September to December
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Agnès DUPRET-BORIES, PhD, Institut Claudius Regaud
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Krahenmann-Muller S, Virgini VS, Blum MR, da Costa BR, Collet TH, Martin Y, Cornuz J, Zimmerli L, Gaspoz JM, Bauer DC, Kerr EA, Aujesky D, Rodondi N. Patient and physician gender concordance in preventive care in university primary care settings. Prev Med. 2014 Oct;67:242-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 10.
- Andersen MR, Urban N. Physician gender and screening: do patient differences account for differences in mammography use? Women Health. 1997;26(1):29-39. doi: 10.1300/J013v26n01_03.
- Franks P, Clancy CM. Physician gender bias in clinical decisionmaking: screening for cancer in primary care. Med Care. 1993 Mar;31(3):213-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00003.
- Frank E, Harvey LK. Prevention advice rates of women and men physicians. Arch Fam Med. 1996 Apr;5(4):215-9. doi: 10.1001/archfami.5.4.215.
- Arrington AK, Jarosek SL, Virnig BA, Habermann EB, Tuttle TM. Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Oct;16(10):2697-704. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0641-z. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
- Tsugawa Y, Jena AB, Figueroa JF, Orav EJ, Blumenthal DM, Jha AK. Comparison of Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates for Medicare Patients Treated by Male vs Female Physicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):206-213. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7875.
- Mehrotra A, Reid RO, Adams JL, Friedberg MW, McGlynn EA, Hussey PS. Physicians with the least experience have higher cost profiles than do physicians with the most experience. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov;31(11):2453-63. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0252.
- Meier P, Duvernoy CS. Influence of gender of physicians and patients on guideline-recommended treatment of chronic heart failure in a cross-sectional study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009 Jun;11(6):631; author reply 631-2. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfp056. Epub 2009 Apr 27. No abstract available.
- Berthold HK, Gouni-Berthold I, Bestehorn KP, Bohm M, Krone W. Physician gender is associated with the quality of type 2 diabetes care. J Intern Med. 2008 Oct;264(4):340-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01967.x. Epub 2008 Apr 4.
- Reid RO, Friedberg MW, Adams JL, McGlynn EA, Mehrotra A. Associations between physician characteristics and quality of care. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Sep 13;170(16):1442-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.307.
- Schieber AC, Delpierre C, Lepage B, Afrite A, Pascal J, Cases C, Lombrail P, Lang T, Kelly-Irving M; INTERMEDE group. Do gender differences affect the doctor-patient interaction during consultations in general practice? Results from the INTERMEDE study. Fam Pract. 2014 Dec;31(6):706-13. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu057. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
- Allais, M. (1953). L'extension des théories de l'équilibre économique général et du rendement social au cas du risque. Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society, 269-290.
- Chabrillac E, Lamy S, Grosclaude P, Cros F, Vairel B, Sarini J, Vergez S, Nebout A, Bories P, Dupret-Bories A. The impact of physician's characteristics on decision-making inhead and neck oncology: Results of a national survey. Oral Oncol. 2022 Jun;129:105895. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105895. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 17HLSHS01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Cancer
-
Robert FerrisAmgenCompletedHead and Neck Cancer | Cancer of Head and Neck | Head Cancer | Neck Cancer | Neoplasms, Head and Neck | Cancer of the Head and Neck | Cancer of Neck | Upper Aerodigestive Tract Neoplasms | Neck Neoplasms | Cancer of the Head | Cancer of the Neck | UADT Neoplasms | Cancer of Head | Head Neoplasms | Head, Neck Neoplasms | Neoplasms, Head and other conditionsUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityRecruitingHead and Neck Cancer | Head and Neck Neoplasms | Cancer of Head and Neck | Neoplasms, Head and Neck | Cancer of the Head and NeckEgypt
-
Mayo ClinicRecruitingCancer Head Neck | Cancer Neck | Cancer, HeadUnited States
-
IRCCS Policlinico S. MatteoNestlé Health Science Spain; Akern SrlCompletedHead-neck CancerItaly
-
University of California, San FranciscoCompleted
-
Chinook Therapeutics, Inc. (formerly Aduro)TerminatedRecurrent Head and Neck Cancer | Metastatic Head and Neck CancerUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedHead And Neck CancerUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedRecurrent Head and Neck Cancer | Metastatic Head and Neck CancerUnited States
-
Centre Oscar LambretUnknownEpidermoid Head and Neck CancerFrance
-
Radboud University Medical CenterUnknown
Clinical Trials on Groupe FALCOn
-
L'hôpital Nord-Ouest - Villefranche Villefranche...Unknown
-
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalCompleted
-
Waid City Hospital, ZurichNot yet recruiting
-
Sha'ar Menashe Mental Health CenterGalil Center for Telemedicine and Medical InformaticsUnknownRemote Consultation | Community PsychiatryIsrael
-
Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mór Teaching HospitalCompletedMultiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive | Multiple Sclerosis, Primary ProgressiveHungary
-
Fundació d'investigació Sanitària de les Illes...Hospital Son EspasesRecruitingFirst CarpoMetacarpal Osteoartrithis | Basal Thumb OsteoartrithisSpain
-
Obslap Research LLCCompletedStroke | Cerebral Palsy | ADHD | Traumatic Brain Injury | Dyslexia | Attention Deficit Disorder | Asperger's SyndromeUnited States
-
Institut Paoli-CalmettesUnknownEvaluation of a Question Prompt List for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (QPL-MDS) (QPL-MDS)Myelodysplastic SyndromesFrance
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruitingAsthma in Children | WheezingFrance
-
Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de MontréalCompletedPain | Anesthesia | HypnosisCanada