Stoma Hernia Intraperitoneal Full-Thickness Skin (SHIFT)

April 29, 2019 updated by: Umeå University

Full-thickness Skin vs. Synthetic Mesh in the Repair of Parastomal Hernia

This is a prospective randomized study to compare surgical methods for the repair of parastomal hernia.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Parastomal hernia is a common complication to a stoma which can cause considerable suffering for the patient. The conventional methods of repair available today have disappointing results with high recurrence rates and serious complications. Some of the complications can be related to the introduction of foreign material into the abdominal wall. The investigators hypothesis is that the use of autologous full-thickness skin graft as reinforcement material can offer an alternative with fewer complications and recurrences.

Patients with symptomatic parastomal hernia will be included in a prospective randomized multicenter study comparing reinforcement with conventional synthetic mesh (with the best available technique today), to full thickness skin grafts placed in an intraperitoneal position. The intervention will be blinded to the participants, nursing staff and the follow-up staff. The participants will be followed up at 3, 12 and 36 months monitoring complications, recurrences, quality of life, strength of the abdomino-lumbar girdle and calculations will be done on the health economics.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Norrbotten
      • Luleå, Norrbotten, Sweden, 95442
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Sunderby Hospital
    • Västerbotten
      • Umeå, Västerbotten, Sweden, 90185
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital of Umeå

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Colo-, ileo- or urostomy
  • Parastomal hernia diagnosed with intrastomal ultrasound and/or CT
  • Symptoms from the parastomal hernia requiring surgical intervention
  • Informed consent
  • >18 years of age
  • Sufficient knowledge in the Swedish language so that questionnaires can be answered

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment unabling compliance to post-operative prescriptions and/or answering questionnaires
  • Insufficient amount of good quality skin suitable for transplantation
  • Expected high donor-site morbidity
  • Fistula/e adjacent to stoma
  • Mb Crohn

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Full-thickness skin graft
Repair of parastomal hernia with full-thickness skin graft, placed intraperitoneally, as reinforcement.
Surgical repair of symptomatic parastomal hernia.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Synthethic mesh
Repair of parastomal hernia with best available conventional method, using synthetic mesh material as reinforcement
Surgical repair of symptomatic parastomal hernia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of complications at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 month post-operative clinical follow-up
Complications will be assessed over a 3 year period of regular follow-up by an objective surgeon who is unaware of which surgical method which was used. Eventual complications may include infection, bleeding, seroma and fistula formation.
3 month post-operative clinical follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence
Time Frame: 3, 12 and 36 months
Parastomal hernia recurrence measured clinically, with stomal ultrasound and/or computerized tomography.
3, 12 and 36 months
Pain - VHPQ
Time Frame: 3, 12 and 36 months.
All subjects will complete Ventral Hernia Pain Questionaire (VHPQ) to assess and compare pre- and postoperative pain.
3, 12 and 36 months.
QoL - EORTC CR29
Time Frame: 3, 12 and 36 months.
All subject will complete European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire module for colorectal cancer (EORTC CR29) as a complement to EORTC C30, to assess and compare pre- and postoperative quality of life.
3, 12 and 36 months.
QoL - EORTC C30
Time Frame: 3, 12 and 36 months.
All subject will complete European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer core quality of life questionnaire (EORTC CR30) to assess and compare pre- and postoperative quality of life.
3, 12 and 36 months.
Abdominal strength
Time Frame: 12 and 36 months.
Strength of the abdomino-lumbar girdle measured in Biodex-4.
12 and 36 months.
Health economics
Time Frame: 12 and 36 months.
Cost-effectiveness of the separate procedures. The total cost of each method will be calculated from the hospital economic systems including duration of surgery, cost of operating time and equipment as well as duration and cost of anesthesia.
12 and 36 months.
Rate of complications at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 month post-operative clinical follow-up
Complications will be assessed over a 3 year period of regular follow-up by an objective surgeon who is unaware of which surgical method which was used. Eventual complications may include infection, bleeding, seroma and fistula formation.
12 month post-operative clinical follow-up
Rate of complications at 36 months
Time Frame: 36 month post-operative clinical follow-up
Complications will be assessed over a 3 year period of regular follow-up by an objective surgeon who is unaware of which surgical method which was used. Eventual complications may include infection, bleeding, seroma and fistula formation.
36 month post-operative clinical follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karin Strigård, PhD, Umeå University, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 23, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017-251-31M

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parastomal Hernia

Clinical Trials on Repair of parastomal hernia

Subscribe