Performance of 2WIN Photoscreener With Corneal Reflex Compared to School Bus Retinoscopy by AAPOS Guidelines (2WINbus)

January 29, 2024 updated by: Alaska Blind Child Discovery

Refractive and Strabismic Amblyopia Risk Factors Detected by Infrared Photoscreener and School Bus Skiascopy

Pediatric eye patients receive infrared photoscreener screening and skiascopy as a part of routine examination to compare ability to detect amblyopia risk factors.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients: Pediatric eye and adult strabismus patients undergoing routine examinations in a private ophthalmology practice.

Interventions: Infrared photoscreener / remote autorefractor such as 2 Winner (2WIN) ("Adaptica" - Padova, Italy) without and with infrared corneal reflex occluder. Child-friendly skiascopy before and after cycloplegic refraction.

Outcome: Amblyopia Risk Factors from comprehensive eye exam including refraction and strabismus.

Risk factors defined by American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) 2003 and 2013 guidelines.

**Please note that 2 Winner has nothing to do with actual device, but was required by the Clinical Trials Web entry.**

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

471

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alaska
      • Anchorage, Alaska, United States, 99508
        • Alaska Children's EYE & Strabismus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 week to 90 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

male and female children and adults with strabismus developmental delay is NOT excluded

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient undergoing eye examination

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
school bus skiascopy
Refractive error estimated by child-friendly skiascopy rack holding lenses from +1.00 D to +10.00 D and -5.00 D. Skiascopy is a common, old-fashioned form of retinoscopy.
Photoscreener (2WIN)
Accommodation, refraction and ocular alignment are estimated by infrared photoscreener using the photoscreener device. Photoscreener screening makes use of light crescent quantification from off-axis flash-to-lens in a camera.
conventional infrared off-axis photoscreener

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Amblyopia Risk Factor (refractive error and/or strabismus)
Time Frame: 2 hours or less: Screening and Gold Standard Exam performed the same day, usually within the same hour.
Whether pre-defined, age-related risk factor is present. AAPOS has published standard levels of these refractive errors or binocular misalignment that render a child at risk of developing sight-threatening amblyopia.
2 hours or less: Screening and Gold Standard Exam performed the same day, usually within the same hour.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert W Arnold, MD, Alaska Blind Child Discovery

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 2, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

de-identified database on-line available

IPD Sharing Time Frame

late 2018

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

public website

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Study Data/Documents

  1. Individual Participant Data Set
    Information comments: Public de-identified ongoing

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractive Errors

Clinical Trials on 2WIN photoscreener

3
Subscribe