- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03676855
Comparison Between Bladder Dissection Before and After Uterine Incision in Cesarean Section for Morbidly Adherent Placenta
September 16, 2018 updated by: Mohamed abd elfatah elsenity, Ain Shams University
Comparison between bladder dissection at the beginning of cesarean section For morbidly adherent placenta and between delaying dissection until planning for cesarean hysterectomy
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
60
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: hassan helmy, master
- Phone Number: 01023308711
- Email: saberaleek2222@yahoo.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: mohamed elsenity, MD
- Phone Number: 01226573332
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 02
- Recruiting
- Ain shams university maternity hospital
-
Principal Investigator:
- mohamed elsenity, MD
-
Contact:
- Amr Elshalakany, Prof
-
Sub-Investigator:
- hassan helmy, master
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Amr EL-Shalakany, prof
-
Sub-Investigator:
- tamer borg, prof
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years to 48 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women with BMI at or under 35 Kg/m2.
- Women having previous two cesarean section or more.
- Women with gestational age more than 32 weeks with viable fetus.
- Women with any degree of placenta previa .
- Patient with morbidly adherent placenta on cesarean scar only.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient who are haemodynamically unstable before skin incision.
- Patient with clinically evident intraamniotic infection.
- Patient with previous history of bladder injury .
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: bladder dissection before uterine incision
|
Comparison between bladder dissection at the beginning of cesarean section For morbidly adherent placenta and between delaying dissection until planning for cesarean hysterectomy
|
Experimental: bladder dissection after uterine incision
|
Comparison between bladder dissection at the beginning of cesarean section For morbidly adherent placenta and between delaying dissection until planning for cesarean hysterectomy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Operative time
Time Frame: icluding all cs over the period of one year
|
of whole cs
|
icluding all cs over the period of one year
|
Blood loss
Time Frame: icluding all cs over the period of one year
|
through counting soaked towels and weighting them before and after being soaked considering the difference in grams as the calculated blood loss and calculating blood in the suction reservoir and comparing pre and post operative Hb level also haemotacrit level and number of units of packed RBCs transfused
|
icluding all cs over the period of one year
|
- Incidence of urological
Time Frame: during cs and post operative delayed complication icluding all cs over the period of one year
|
- Incidence of urological injuries discovered intraoperative and procedure needed to repair or as a late complication as fistula formation.
|
during cs and post operative delayed complication icluding all cs over the period of one year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Neonatal APGAR score
Time Frame: after delivery of the baby during the 1st 15 minutes
|
Neonatal APGAR score
|
after delivery of the baby during the 1st 15 minutes
|
Time taken to create bladder flap
Time Frame: from the start of bladder dissection icluding all cs over the period of one year
|
from the start of bladder dissection
|
from the start of bladder dissection icluding all cs over the period of one year
|
3 months post operative filling cystometry
Time Frame: 3 months post operative
|
3 months post operative filling cystometry
|
3 months post operative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 31, 2018
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
February 1, 2019
Study Completion (Anticipated)
March 31, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 16, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
September 19, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 19, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 16, 2018
Last Verified
September 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- FWA000017585MD361/2017
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Yes
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Morbidly Adherent Placenta
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingMorbidly Adherent PlacentaEgypt
-
Sohag UniversityRecruiting
-
Ain Shams Maternity HospitalCompletedMorbidly Adherent PlacentaEgypt
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingHypoxia | Morbidly Adherent Placenta | Autophagy | Placenta
-
Aljazeera HospitalCairo University; National Research Centre, EgyptCompleted
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...WithdrawnPlacenta Accreta | Morbidly Adherent Placenta
-
University Hospital, AngersAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris; Institut National de la Santé Et de...UnknownPlacenta Accreta | Morbidly Adherent Placenta | Placenta Percreta | Placenta IncretaFrance
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingUrinary Tract Injuries During Caesarean Section for Morbidly Adherent Placenta: Prospective and Retrospective StudyEgypt
-
Kasr El Aini HospitalUnknownPlacenta Accreta in Placenta Previa Anterior
Clinical Trials on bladder dissection
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingPlacenta Accreta Spectrum | Cesarean HysterectomyEgypt
-
Mansoura UniversityRecruitingTotal Laparoscopic HysterectomyEgypt
-
Jagiellonian UniversityRecruiting
-
National Naval Medical CenterCompleted
-
Ethicon Endo-SurgeryChildren's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiTerminated
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompleted
-
Catholic University of the Sacred HeartCompletedUterine Cervical NeoplasmsItaly
-
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCompletedProstate Cancer | Radiotherapy Side EffectUnited Kingdom
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedNeurogenic Bladder | Detrusor Overactivity | Detrusor UnderactivityKorea, Republic of
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalUnknown