The Safety and Efficacy of Fibrinolysis in Patients With an Indwelling Pleural Catheter for Multi-loculated Malignant Pleural Effusion.

March 3, 2020 updated by: Yale University

The Safety and Efficacy of Fibrinolysis in Patients With an Indwelling Pleural Catheter for Multi-loculated Malignant Pleural Effusion: a Prospective Randomized Trial

The safety and efficacy of fibrinolysis in patients with an indwelling pleural catheter for multi-loculated malignant pleural effusion.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Detailed Description

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a condition where fluid accumulates in the chest (pleural space) due to the presence of cancer. The malignancy may is usually metastatic from the lung, breast, or elsewhere and the presence of a MPE usually causes significant morbidity, particularly shortness of breath. Once a MPE develops, the patient's disease cannot be cured, but symptoms of dyspnea can be palliated.

Malignant effusions usually recur after thoracentesis, a procedure to remove the fluid. Upon recurrence, patients usually undergo placement of an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC). This is a small tube that drains fluid from inside the chest into a bottle to be discarded. It is very effective at treating shortness of breath and is safe.

On occasion, these catheters stop functioning, leading to an increase in the effusion again. This may be due to small amounts of blood or debris such as fibrin that clog the catheter, or it may be related to the pleural fluid becoming too thick to drain. Medication, namely tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), can be placed inside the catheter to promote drainage. With simple clogging, the tPA acts like "Draino." For fluid that has become too thick and pleural effusions that won't drain due to loculations, the tPA helps dissolve debris in the pleural fluid to promote drainage. Without this drainage, patients remain impaired due to shortness of breath related to the fluid.

tPA is effective at draining the fluid when debris has clogged the catheter or the pleural space. However, the exact dosing is unknown. For "simple" clogging, small doses may be used. When extensive loculations are present, large doses may be required to help the patient. Two retrospective studies have looked at very small doses of tPA placed through the IPC with the goal of breaking up the clogs in the catheter itself. These studies used between 2 and 5 mg of tPA.1,2 At Yale-New Haven Hospital, 25 mg has typically been used due to historical preference. It is unknown whether high doses of tPA improve its therapeutic efficacy.

The investigators hypothesize that higher dose fibrinolysis with 25mg of tPA (compared with 2.5 mg) will provide more effective clearance of fluid loculations, resulting in improved radiographic appearance and less shortness of breath without an increased risk of complications, such as bleeding.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Malignant Pleural Effusion MPE (either cytology proven or recurrent exudative pleural effusion in the context of histologically proven cancer)
  • Presence of an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC)
  • Nondraining IPC (defined as <50 mL of drainage on the past three drainage attempts) not responding to routine saline flush to assure patency
  • Residual pleural fluid remaining on chest x-ray (CXR) or ultrasound
  • Dyspnea deemed attributable to the effusion (i.e. symptomatic loculations), as assessed by the treating chest physician and using the modified Borg scale
  • Presence of written informed consent from the patient or surrogate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18
  • Expected survival less than 14 days
  • Known allergy or intolerance to tissue plasminogen activator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: tPA standard dosage
Tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA) dose of 10 to 25 mg.
Tissue plasminogen activator 25mg dosage
Other Names:
  • tissue plasminogen activator
Experimental: tPA low dosage
tPA dose of 2.5mg
Tissue plasminogen activator 2.5mg
Other Names:
  • tissue plasminogen activator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in patient chest X-ray
Time Frame: up to 40 days
Defined as change in percentage of hemithorax occupied by the pleural opacity on chest X-ray from the baseline chest X-ray to the X-ray at the end of the study protocol.
up to 40 days
Improvement on the modified Borg dyspnea scale after tPA
Time Frame: up to 40 days
Change in modified Borg dyspnea scale obtained at clinic visit where tPA is administered compared to modified Borg dyspnea scale obtained after post-tPA drainage.
up to 40 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to recurrent loculation
Time Frame: up to 90 days
In patients where tPA restores effective drainage, the time to and rate of patients who experience recurrent ineffective drainage due to loculation
up to 90 days
Rate of pleurodesis
Time Frame: up to 90 days
The rate of patients who are able to have the indwelling pleural catheter removed.
up to 90 days
Improvements in dyspnea using the modified Borg scale
Time Frame: up to 40 days
Change in modified Borg dyspnea scale obtained at initial clinic visit compared to scale at the end of the study protocol.
up to 40 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subgroup analysis of patients with trapped lung
Time Frame: up to 40 days
We will also perform subgroup analysis by patients with trapped lung, stratification by primary tumor type, and stratification by the LENT score (a validated prognostic score for predicting mortality in patients with MPE).
up to 40 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark Godfrey, MD, Yale University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pleural Effusion

Clinical Trials on tPA standard dosage

3
Subscribe