- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03678441
Electronic Neurocognitive Tools in Screening for Mental Capability in Patients Undergoing Liver Surgery
A Feasibility Study of Electronic Neurocognitive Screening Tools in Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Evaluate feasibility of the electronic batteries, measured by the completion rate and time to completion of the batteries.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Comparison of the completion rate and time to completion between the written and electronic batteries.
II. Comparison of the scoring distribution between the screening tools.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. Assess if a history of mental or cognitive illness or ongoing treatment with neuropsychiatric medications impact the ability to complete written and/or electronic neurocognitive screening.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.
GROUP I: Patients receive the BrainCheck cognitive assessment over 15 minutes followed by the paper and pen cognitive assessment within 2 months prior to surgery and within 2 months after surgery.
GROUP II: Patients receive the paper and pen cognitive assessment followed by the BrainCheck cognitive assessment over 15 minutes 2 months prior to surgery and within 2 months after surgery.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- M D Anderson Cancer Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All English-speaking patients undergoing hepatectomy at main campus University of Texas (UT)-MD Anderson Cancer Center who are cognitively able to provide informed consent in the opinion of the attending physician.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group I (BrainCheck and paper and pen cognitive assessment)
Patients receive the BrainCheck cognitive assessment over 15 minutes followed by the paper and pen assessment 2 months prior to surgery and within 2 months after surgery.
|
Receive BrainCheck cognitive assessment
Other Names:
Receive pen and paper cognitive assessment
|
|
Active Comparator: Group II (pen and paper and BrainCheck cognitive assessment)
Patients receive the paper and pen assessment followed by the BrainCheck cognitive assessment over 15 minutes 2 months prior to surgery and within 2 months after surgery.
|
Receive BrainCheck cognitive assessment
Other Names:
Receive pen and paper cognitive assessment
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Completion rate of the BrainCheck battery
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Will be calculated along with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Completion rate of the pen and paper assessment
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Will be calculated along with a 95% CI.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Average time to complete the BrainCheck battery
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Will be calculated along with a 95% CI.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Average time to complete the pen and paper assessment
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Will be calculated along with a 95% CI.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Difference in completion rate between the BrainCheck battery and paper and pen assessment
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Will be calculated along with 95% CIs.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Difference in time to completion between the BrainCheck battery and the pen and paper assessment
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Will be calculated along with 95% CIs.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Difference in score between the BrainCheck battery and the pen and paper assessments
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Will be calculated along with 95% CIs.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy of the electronic battery compared to the validated St. Louis University Mental Status Examination (SLUMS)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Will be calculated along with 95% CIs.
|
Up to 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Timothy Newhook, MD, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2018-0093 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
- NCI-2018-01895 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.