Thoracic Epidural Analgesia or Four-Quadrant Transversus Abdominus Plane Block in Reducing Pain in Patients Undergoing Liver Surgery

February 12, 2024 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Randomized, Unblinded, Phase III Trial of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Versus Four-Quadrant Transversus Abdominus Plane Block in Oncologic Open-Incision Liver Surgery

This phase III trial studies how well thoracic epidural analgesia or four-quadrant transversus abdominus plane block works in reducing pain in patients undergoing liver surgery. It is not yet known whether thoracic epidural analgesia or four-quadrant transversus abdominus plane block may help people to recover more completely and more quickly after surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To compare length of hospital stay between patients treated with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) versus (vs.) pre-incision ultrasound-guided, four-quadrant transversus abdominus plane (TAP) block after open liver resection within an enhanced recovery program.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare the area under the curve of early (0-48 hour) post-operative pain scores and number of patients who experience severe postoperative pain between the TEA and TAP groups.

II. To compare anesthetic-related complication rates and need to change modalities between TEA and TAP groups.

III. To compare surgery-related complications (including 30-day readmission and 90-day mortality rates) between TEA and TAP groups.

IV. To compare return to baseline symptom burden, functional and cognitive status between TEA and TAP groups.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized into 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients undergo placement of thoracic epidural catheter before surgery. Patients receive hydromorphone hydrochloride and bupivacaine via thoracic epidural catheter every 10 minutes or 3 hours as needed. Patients may receive fentanyl and bupivacaine or plain bupivacaine via thoracic epidural catheter.

ARM II: Patients undergo placement of ultrasound-guided, four-quadrant transversus abdominus plane block. Patients receive plain bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine via TAP block.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

96

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Timothy E. Newhook

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing open liver resection without bowel resection/anastomosis for malignancy at MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Patients must sign a study-specific consent form
  • Platelets >= 100,000/ml (within 30 days of surgery)
  • International normalized ratio (INR) =< 1.5 (within 30 days of surgery)
  • Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) =< 40 (within 30 days of surgery)
  • Patients must have no fever or evidence of infection or other coexisting medical condition that would preclude epidural placement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of severe uncontrolled systemic disease or other comorbidity that precludes liver surgery
  • History of chronic narcotic use, defined as 30 days or more of preoperative daily narcotic use, measured from the date of surgery
  • Anaphylaxis to local anesthetics or narcotics
  • Previous or current neurologic disease affecting the lower hemithorax or below
  • Major open abdominal/thoracic surgery in the previous 30 days under general anesthesia
  • Technical contraindications to epidural placement: previous thoracic spinal surgery or local skin or soft tissue infection at proposed site for epidural insertion
  • Use of therapeutic anticoagulation within 5 days of surgery (not including venous thromboembolism prophylaxis)
  • Known bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
  • Psychiatric (untreated or poorly controlled schizophrenia, major depression, or bipolar disorder), or communication (language) barrier that would preclude accurate assessment of postoperative pain and/or ability to answer questionnaires (need to be able to read, comprehend, and answer questions)
  • Inability to comply with study and/or follow-up procedures
  • Patient refusal to participate in randomization
  • Pregnant women are excluded from this study; women of childbearing potential (defined as those who have not undergone defined as those who have not undergone a hysterectomy or who have not been postmenopausal for at least 12 consecutive months) must agree to practice adequate contraception and to refrain from breast-feeding, as specified in the informed consent
  • Patients with obvious unresectable disease prior to signing informed consent
  • Patients with previous ventral hernia repair, cosmetic abdominoplasty or anterior abdominal wall reconstruction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (TAE)
Patients undergo placement of thoracic epidural catheter before surgery. Patients receive hydromorphone hydrochloride and bupivacaine via thoracic epidural catheter every 10 minutes or 3 hours as needed. Patients may receive fentanyl and bupivacaine or plain bupivacaine via thoracic epidural catheter.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Questionnaires
Given via thoracic epidural catheter or TAP block
Other Names:
  • AH 250
Given via thoracic epidural catheter
Other Names:
  • Abstral
  • Duragesic
Given via thoracic epidural catheter
Other Names:
  • Dilaudid
  • Exalgo
  • Hydromorphone
  • Dilaudid HP
  • Dimorphone
  • Hydrostat
  • Hymorphan
  • Laudicon
  • Novolauden
Undergo placement of thoracic epidural catheter
Other Names:
  • IMPLANTED
Undergo placement of ultrasound-guided, four-quadrant transversus abdominus plane block
Other Names:
  • IMPLANTED
Experimental: Arm II (TAP)
Patients undergo placement of ultrasound-guided, four-quadrant transversus abdominus plane block. Patients receive plain bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine via TAP block.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Questionnaires
Given via thoracic epidural catheter or TAP block
Other Names:
  • AH 250
Undergo placement of thoracic epidural catheter
Other Names:
  • IMPLANTED
Undergo placement of ultrasound-guided, four-quadrant transversus abdominus plane block
Other Names:
  • IMPLANTED
Given via TAP block
Other Names:
  • Exparel
  • Bupivacaine Liposome Injectable Suspension

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total length of inpatient stay
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Will be recorded and compared between groups. Will be summarized using descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation, median and range. Will be compared with 2-sample t- tests, Mann Whitney U tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests as indicated.
Up to 5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early post-operative pain control
Time Frame: Within 48 hours post surgery
The area under the curve for each patient will be computed using the trapezoidal method using the pain score by time curve as has been done in prior studies of this type at MD Anderson. Will be compared between groups. In addition, the number of patients experiencing severe pain (>= 7/10) during the inpatient recovery period will be compared between study groups. Will be summarized using descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation, median and range. Will be compared with 2-sample t- tests, Mann Whitney U tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests as indicated.
Within 48 hours post surgery
Complication rates secondary to the analgesic regimen
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Pain control modality complications will be prospectively recorded including epidural hematoma, epidural catheter migration/malfunction, injection/exit site cellulitis, epidural abscess, cerebrospinal fluid leak, prolonged ileus (defined as inability to tolerate regular diet by post operation day 5), imbalance and gait instability, altered mental status and delirium, and need to change pain control modality due to inadequate pain control. The rate of these complications will be compared between study groups. Will be tabulated with frequency and percentages. Will be compared using chi-square test with Fisher's correction as indicated.
Up to 5 years
Surgical complication rates
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Postoperative surgical complications will be prospectively recorded and graded using the Accordian grading scale. Liver surgery specific complications including bile fistula, bleeding requiring transfusion and liver failure will be recorded. 30-day readmission and 90-day mortality will be recorded. The rates of these complications will be compared between study groups. Will be tabulated with frequency and percentages. Will be compared using chi-square test with Fisher's correction as indicated.
Up to 5 years
Measures of functional recovery
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Quality of recovery will be assessed using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for gastrointestinal cancer (MDASI-GI) at regimented intervals including preoperative baseline and postoperative inpatient and outpatient recovery, Return to baseline symptoms including return to baseline life interference summary score at 6 weeks postoperatively, measured using the MDASI-GI, will be compared between groups. Likewise, pre- and post-operative physical and cognitive performance recovery will be compared between groups. Will be summarized using descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation, median and range. Will be compared with 2-sample t- tests, Mann Whitney U tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests as indicated.
Up to 5 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to readiness for RIOT (return to intended oncologic therapy)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Will be tabulated with frequency and percentages. Will be compared using chi-square test with Fisher's correction as indicated. To assess the relationship between study variables and time to event outcomes (such as RIOT), Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests will be used.
Up to 5 years
Narcotic utilization
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Will be summarized using descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation, median and range. Will be compared with 2-sample t- tests, Mann Whitney U tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests as indicated.
Up to 5 years
Compliance with ordering and delivery of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program elements
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Will be tabulated with frequency and percentages. Will be compared using chi-square test with Fisher's correction as indicated.
Up to 5 years
Cost of perioperative care
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Will be summarized using descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation, median and range. Will be compared with 2-sample t- tests, Mann Whitney U tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests as indicated.
Up to 5 years
Biologic inflammatory markers
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Will be summarized using descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation, median and range. Will be compared with 2-sample t- tests, Mann Whitney U tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests as indicated.
Up to 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Timothy E. Newhook, MD, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver and Intrahepatic Bile Duct Disorder

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire

3
Subscribe