Impact of Reduced Cannabis Use on Functional Outcomes

March 4, 2021 updated by: Duke University
Nearly 20 million Americans report use of cannabis in the past month, and heavy cannabis use has increased by nearly 60% in the U.S. since 2007. Heavy cannabis use is associated with lower educational attainment, reduced physical activity, and increased rates of addiction, unemployment, and neuropsychological deficits. Studies by the lab and others suggest that cannabis use is also associated with increased mental health symptoms and suicidal and nonsuicidal self-injury. In addition, cannabis is the illicit drug most strongly associated with drugged driving and traffic accidents, including fatal accidents. There is evidence that sustained abstinence from cannabis can lead to improvements in the functional outcomes of former users. However, he degree to which reductions in cannabis use might be associated with positive changes in functional outcomes is currently unknown. The overall objective of the present research is to use ecological momentary assessment (EMA), a real-time, naturalistic data collection method, to study the impact of reduced cannabis use on functional outcomes in heavy cannabis users. Contingency management (CM) will be used to promote reductions in frequency and quantity of cannabis use. CM is an intensive behavioral therapy that is highly effective at producing short-term reductions in illicit drug use. The investigators novel approach includes mobile technology to make CM more portable and feasible. The present research will use this technology in conjunction with state-of-the-art EMA methods to study the impact of reduced cannabis use on key functional outcomes. The investigators central hypothesis is that reductions in frequency and quantity of cannabis use will lead to positive changes in cannabis users' mental health, physical activity, working memory, health-related quality of life, and driving behavior.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Nearly 20 million Americans report use of cannabis in the past month, and heavy cannabis use has increased by nearly 60% in the U.S. since 2007. Heavy cannabis use is associated with lower educational attainment, reduced physical activity, and increased rates of addiction, unemployment, and neuropsychological deficits. Studies by the lab and others suggest that cannabis use is also associated with increased mental health symptoms and suicidal and nonsuicidal self-injury. In addition, cannabis is the illicit drug most strongly associated with drugged driving and traffic accidents, including fatal accidents. While there is evidence that sustained abstinence can lead to improvements in the functional outcomes of former users, the degree to which reductions in cannabis use alone (i.e., in the absence of sustained abstinence) might be associated with positive changes in functional outcomes is currently unknown. This is a critical gap in the literature, as many clinical interventions for cannabis and other drugs are associated with decreases in frequency and quantity of use, but fail to achieve an effect on overall abstinence rates. The overall objective of the present research is to use ecological momentary assessment (EMA), a real-time, naturalistic data collection method, to prospectively study the impact of reduced cannabis use on functional outcomes in heavy cannabis users. EMA addresses several limitations of traditional assessment techniques by enhancing ecological validity, minimizing memory bias, and enabling examination of the impact of context on participants' behavior. Contingency management (CM) will be used to promote reductions in frequency and quantity of cannabis use. CM is an intensive behavioral therapy that is highly effective at producing short-term reductions in illicit drug use. Moreover, the investigators have recently developed a novel approach that leverages mobile technology and recent developments in cannabis testing to make CM for cannabis more portable and feasible. The investigators have pilot-tested this approach with heavy cannabis users and found that it is an acceptable and feasible method to reduce their cannabis use. The present research will use this technology in conjunction with state-of-the-art EMA methods to study the impact of reduced cannabis use on key functional outcomes. The investigators central hypothesis is that reductions in frequency and quantity of cannabis use will lead to positive changes in cannabis users' mental health, physical activity, working memory, health-related quality of life, and driving behavior. The rationale for this research is that it will provide the first and only real-time data concerning the potential impact of reductions in cannabis use on functional outcomes. As such, the findings from the present research will directly inform ongoing efforts to include reductions in illicit drug use as a valid, clinically-meaningful outcome measure in clinical trials of pharmacotherapies for the treatment of substance use disorders.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27706
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • cannabis use on ≥40 of past 90 days
  • ability to speak and write fluent English
  • 18-70 years of age
  • willingness to attempt to temporarily reduce cannabis use

Exclusion Criteria:

  • expect to have an unstable medication regimen during the study
  • are currently receiving non-study CUD treatment
  • meet criteria for serious mental illness (e.g., bipolar disorder, schizophrenia)
  • become imprisoned
  • become hospitalized for psychiatric reasons
  • become pregnant
  • report imminent risk for suicide or homicide
  • meet criteria for a substance use disorder other than CUD or tobacco

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Reduced Use Condition
This arm includes six weeks of mobile contingency management treatment administered via a smart-phone based application (mobile CM), in which participants are provided monetary reinforcement for reducing cannabis use.
Participants are provided monetary reinforcement for providing oral fluid test results that suggest they have reduced cannabis use.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Complete the Baseline Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline
Adherence is defined as completing the baseline assessment
Baseline
Number of Participants Who Complete the 8-week Follow-up Assessment
Time Frame: 8- week follow up
Adherence is defined as completing the 8-week follow-up assessment
8- week follow up
Number of Participants Who Complete 1 or More Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA) Per Day (Total ≥56) for the Duration of the 8-week EMA Protocol
Time Frame: 8 week follow up
Adherence is defined as completing 1 or more EMA assessments per day (total ≥56) for the duration of the 8-week EMA protocol
8 week follow up
Number of Participants Who Score Above Threshold on Treatment Acceptability Measure
Time Frame: 8-week posttreatment visit
Acceptability of treatment will be measured by a questionnaire designed for use in this study. A single item measured acceptability of treatment, with a Likert scale (1-10) response in which 1=extremely unacceptable and 10=extremely acceptable. Threshold for acceptability is a score of 6 or greater.
8-week posttreatment visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Have ≥ 50% Reduction in Frequency of Cannabis Use
Time Frame: Ad lib monitoring period (up to 2 weeks), 8-week posttreatment visit
To evaluate if this milestone has been met, the investigators will calculate the percentage reduction in bioverified abstinent days by comparing the ad lib monitoring period to the mobile CM period.
Ad lib monitoring period (up to 2 weeks), 8-week posttreatment visit
Average Number of Days Since Last Cannabis Use
Time Frame: 8-week posttreatment visit
Investigators will use count-adjusted (i.e., negative binomial or Poisson) MLM to model the equivalent number of joints/gram smoked on a given day as a function of days since last use.
8-week posttreatment visit
Number of Participants Who Have ≥ 50% Reduction in Quantity of Cannabis Use
Time Frame: Ad lib monitoring period (up to 2 weeks), 8-week posttreatment visit
To evaluate if this milestone has been met, the investigators will calculate the percentage reduction in overall cannabis quantity by comparing the ad lib monitoring period to the mobile CM period.
Ad lib monitoring period (up to 2 weeks), 8-week posttreatment visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 23, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 23, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00100100

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to share individual participant data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cannabis

Clinical Trials on Mobile Contingency Management, active

Subscribe