Impact of Reduced Cannabis Use on Functional Outcomes (R33 Phase) (FOCUS)

November 4, 2024 updated by: Duke University
Nearly 20 million Americans report use of cannabis in the past month, and heavy cannabis use has increased by nearly 60% in the U.S. since 2007. Heavy cannabis use is associated with lower educational attainment, reduced physical activity, increased rates of addiction and unemployment, and neuropsychological deficits. Studies suggest that cannabis use is also associated with increased mental health symptoms, drugged driving, and traffic accidents. While there is evidence that sustained abstinence can lead to improvements in the functional outcomes of former users, the degree to which reductions alone (i.e., not sustained abstinence) in cannabis use might be associated with positive changes in functional outcomes is unknown. This is a critical gap in the literature, as many interventions for cannabis and other drugs are associated with decreases in frequency and quantity of use, but fail to achieve an effect on overall abstinence rates. The objective of the present research is to use ecological momentary assessment (EMA), a real-time, naturalistic data collection method, to prospectively study the impact of reduced cannabis use on functional outcomes in heavy cannabis users. Contingency management (CM) will be used to promote reductions in frequency and quantity of cannabis use. CM is an intensive behavioral therapy that is highly effective at producing short-term reductions in illicit drug use. We have recently developed a novel approach that leverages mobile technology and recent developments in cannabis testing. We have pilot-tested this approach with heavy cannabis users and found that it is an acceptable and feasible method. The present research will use this technology in conjunction with EMA methods to study the impact of reduced cannabis use on key functional outcomes. Our central hypothesis is that reductions in frequency and quantity of cannabis use will lead to positive changes in cannabis users' mental health, self-efficacy, physical activity, working memory, health-related quality of life, and driving behavior. The rationale for this research is that it will provide the first and only real-time data concerning the potential impact of reductions in cannabis use on functional outcomes. As such, the findings from the present research will directly inform ongoing efforts to include reductions in illicit drug use as a valid, clinically-meaningful outcome measure in clinical trials of pharmacotherapies for the treatment of substance use disorders.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27706
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Report 40 or more days of cannabis use (other than ingested cannabis, i.e., edibles) in past 90 days
  • Can speak and write fluent conversational English
  • Are between 18 and 80 years of age
  • Are willing to attempt to reduce frequency of cannabis use
  • Complete at least 10 of the 14 nightly diaries during the ad lib phase of the study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Are expected to have an unstable medication regimen during the study
  • Are currently receiving non-study treatment for cannabis use disorder
  • Are pregnant or become pregnant
  • Meet criteria for a serious mental illness (e.g., bipolar disorder, schizophrenia)
  • Meet criteria for a substance use disorder other than nicotine or cannabis use disorders
  • Are currently imprisoned or in psychiatric hospitalization or become imprisoned or in psychiatric hospitalization
  • Report imminent risk for suicide or homicide
  • Meet criteria for bio-verified sustained abstinence (i.e., all of their saliva tests are negative during the 6-week experimental phase of the study)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Reduced Use Condition
Participants in the reduced use condition will be provided mobile contingency management, in which they are paid to provide marijuana saliva readings that suggest they have been abstinent from marijuana use.
Mobile contingency management is a mobile-phone based behavioral therapy that provides positive reinforcement (i.e., money) for abstinence that is highly effective at reducing substance use.
Other Names:
  • mCM
No Intervention: Control Condition
Participants in the control condition will be asked to provide marijuana saliva readings, but they are not paid for abstinent readings. Instead, their payments are yoked to the average amount of payment made by two participants in the reduced use condition.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Mental Health Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Mental health symptoms will be measured by the 90-item Symptom Checklist (SCL-90). This measure has a scoring range of 0 to 360, with lower scores indicating lower distress related to mental health.
Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Change in Self-reported Self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Self-efficacy will be measured by the Marijuana Reduction Strategies Self-Efficacy Scale. This measure has a scoring range of 0 to 84, with higher scores indicating increased self-efficacy.
Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Change in Physical Activity as Measured by the Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Physical activity will be measured using the Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 99, with higher scores indicating increased physical activity.
Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Change in Physical Activity as Measured by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Physical activity will be measured using a continuous score on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. The score is calculated by multiplying metabolic equivalents times minutes per day times days per week; scores range from 0 to 13,440. Higher scores indicate increased physical activity.
Time Frame: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Health-related Quality of Life, WHOQOL-BREF
Time Frame: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Health-related quality of life will be measured with the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief (WHOQOL-BREF). The measure has a scoring range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life.
Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Change in Visual Working Memory
Time Frame: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Visual working memory will be measured by the Visual Working Memory (VWM) Index of Wechsler Memory Scale, which is comprised of the Symbol Span and Spatial Addition subtests, whose scores are added together to create a VWM score. Although this scale has no minimum or maximum score, higher scores indicate better visual working memory.
Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Change in Auditory Working Memory
Time Frame: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Auditory working memory will be measured by the Auditory Working Memory (AWM) Index of Wechsler Memory Scale, which is comprised of the Digit Span and Letter-Number Sequencing subtests, whose scores are added together to create a AWM score. Although this scale has no minimum or maximum score, higher scores indicate better auditory working memory.
Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Change in Impulsivity as Measured by Delay Discounting (i.e., Iowa Gambling Task)
Time Frame: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Impulsivity will be measured with a delay discounting task called the Iowa Gambling Task. Scores range from -100 to 100. Higher scores indicate more advantageous choices (i.e., lower impulsivity).
Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Change in Impulsivity as Measured by the Balloon Analogue Risk Task
Time Frame: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Impulsivity will be measured with the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. Scores range from 0 to 128, and higher scores indicate higher impulsivity.
Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Change in Impulsivity as Measured by Self-report
Time Frame: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Self-reported impulsivity will be measured with the Urgency, Premeditation (lack of), Perserverance (lack of), Sensation Seeking, Positive Urgency, Impulsive Behavior Scale (UPPS-P). The measure has a score range of 59 to 236. Higher scores indicate higher impulsivity.
Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Change in Number of Days of Drugged Driving
Time Frame: Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)
Number of days of drugged driving in the past month will be self-reported by participants using a Timeline Follow-Back Interview.
Baseline and post-treatment (approximately eight weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 19, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 22, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 22, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PRO00100100_1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to share individual participant data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cannabis

Clinical Trials on Mobile contingency management

Subscribe